Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: atomic energy act 1962 section 3 · Page 1 of about 124 results (0.057 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 12 2004

Andhra Bank Vs. B. Satyanarayana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-12-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Bank (Officers') Service Regulations, 1982 - Regulation 17 and 17(1); Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 - Sections 8, 12(1), 12(2) and 19; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 13, 14 and 18; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC4007; JT2004(2)SC312; (2004)IILLJ5SC; 2004(2)SCALE446; (2004)2SCC657; 2004(2)SLJ227(SC); (2004)2UPLBEC2109

and Ors. : AIR2004SC1442 , this Court while rejecting a similar contention as regard Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 held:'The question as to whether a statute is ultra vires Constitution of India having conferred unguided, uncanalised or … S.B. Sinha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.3.1998 passed by a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Appeal No. 1152 of 1988

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2013

Novartis Ag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2013

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3(d)(b), 2(1)(d), 133, 24(A), 25(1), 2(8)(10), 14, 5, 10; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Section 20(1); Patents and Designs Act, 1911

in respect of an invention relating to atomic energy falling within sub-section (1) of section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).Section 5. Inventions where only methods or processes of manufacture patentable.- In the case of inventions-a) … provided in the Zimmermann patent specifications; and further that the patentability of the alleged invention was disallowed by section 3(d) of the Act; and also that July 18, 1997, the Swiss priority date, was wrongly claimed as the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2004

Indian Industrial Mineral Producers Welfare Association Vs. Government ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-26-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4 and 5; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(3) and 66A; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 5; Atomic Energy (Working of the Mines, Minerals and Handling of the Prescribed Substances) Rules, 1984 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD471; 2005(3)ALT61

Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short 'MMRD Act') and the Rules made thereunder, apart from the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and the Rules framed thereunder.2. It is stated that India has large reserves of beach sand minerals in … any person unless such person--(a) is an Indian national, or a company as defined in Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Companies Act, 1956; and(b) satisfies such conditions as may be prescribed :Provided that in respect of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 28 2005

Citizens for a Just Society, Through Its Vice President, K. Pullaiah V ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-28-2005

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 13, 18 and 27; Official Secrets Act, 1923

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR20; 2005(5)BomCR316

The apex Court was satisfied that the order issued by the Central Government under Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and its claim of privilege do not suffer from any legal infirmity warranting interference with the High Court … the geological fault- line running at the middle of Thane Creek which separates Mumbai from New Mumbai cities. 3. A further public concern is from the fact that a huge nuclear establishment is located on the west

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1998

Mukand Ltd. and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-23-1998

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 3; Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 - Sections 2(5), 24 and 64(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Raj173

24 and 64 (1)(f) read with Schedule-Ill of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act. 1953 and Section 3(d) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. Section 64(1)(f) of theAcl of 1953 enables the Gram Panchayat to charge octroi duty if the goods are brought

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2012

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-31-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

been filed on the grounds that the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) constituted under Section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 is empowered to review from the safety angle before the commissioning of the Atomic Energy Project and it … percent of the paid up share capital is held by the Central Government;" 38.3. By the same amendment, Section 3(a) of the Act was brought in which empowers not only the Central Government to produce, develop, use and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2004

People's Union for Civil Liberties and Anr. Vs. Union of India (UOi) a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-06-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 10, 19, 19(1), 19(2) and 226; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 23, 27, 30 and 136; Radiation Protection Rules, 1971; Atomic Energy (Working of Mines, Minerals and Handling of Prescribed Substances) Rules; Atomic Energy (Safe Disposal and Radioactive Wastes) Rules, 1987; Atomic Energy (Factories) Rules, 1996; Atomic Energy (Control of Irradiation of Food) Rules, 1996; Evidence Act - Sections 123 and 162; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166

Reported in : AIR2004SC1442; (2004)2CALLT39(SC); JT2004(1)SC152; 2004(1)SCALE91; (2004)2SCC476; 2004(2)LC836(SC); [2004] 1 SCR 232

programme, qualifications and licensing policies for personnel by the project/ plants; Enforcing rules and regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 for radiation safety in the country and such other functions as specified therein.5. With the said counter affidavit, … material which spontaneously emits radiation in excess of the levels prescribed by notification by the Central Government.' 14. Section 3 provides for the general powers of the Central Government which include:(a) to produce, develop, use and dispose of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1996

Dr. Buddhi Kota Subbarao Vs. K.Parasaran and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-13-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18, 19 and 26(2); Indian Penel Code, 1860 - Sections 120B, 193, 195 and 196

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)133; AIR1996SC2687; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)134; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)271; 1996CriLJ3983; 1996(3)Crimes143(SC); JT1996(7)SC265; 1996(5)SCALE797; (1996)5SCC530; [1996]Supp4SCR5

the then Attorney General of India, Mr. K. Parasaran (respondent No. 1 herein) under Section 26(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and authorisation from the Chief Vigilance Officer of the Department of Atomic Energy Mr. S.K. Bhandarkar (respondent No. … committing Magistrate to stand his trial in the court of Sessions. Charges for offences including the offences under Section 3/6 Official Secrets Act and Sections 18/19 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 were framed against him. Against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2005

The Central Intelligence Officer Vs. the Commissioner of Inquiry (Mara ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 5(2) to 5(5), 6, 8, 8B, 8C and 12; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 40(2); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 3; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18; Kerala Commission of Inquiry Rules, 1958 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15 and 16; Commissions of Inquiry (Central) Rules, 1972; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4 - Order 11, Rule 1 - Order 16, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 77(3), 372 and 395; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 102, 103 and 482

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2944; 2005(2)KLT927

the Rules framed under the above said Act. He also invited our attention to Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.32. Now we shall consider how far the privilege claimed by the State as well as the Central Intelligence … a judicial inquiry into the incidents.5. The Government of Kerala constituted a one man Inquiry Commission as per Section 3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952. Sri. Thomas P. Joseph, who was then working as the District

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2008

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2008

Subject : ArbitrationElectricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

it is inconsistent with any other provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986) or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962) or the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989).11. Mr. K.K. Venugopal submitted that a joint … electrical energy. The appellant-company has its generation station at Hazira, Surat. On 30th May, 1996 the appellant-company entered into a power purchase agreement (hereinafter in … the learned Single Judge of the Gujarat High Court dated 15.6.2006 which was passed on a petition under Section 11(5) and (6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter in short 'the 1996 Act'). By that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial