Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: atomic energy act 1962 section 2 · Page 1 of about 137 results (0.023 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 13 1996

Dr. Buddhi Kota Subbarao Vs. K.Parasaran and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-13-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18, 19 and 26(2); Indian Penel Code, 1860 - Sections 120B, 193, 195 and 196

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)133; AIR1996SC2687; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)134; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)271; 1996CriLJ3983; 1996(3)Crimes143(SC); JT1996(7)SC265; 1996(5)SCALE797; (1996)5SCC530; [1996]Supp4SCR5

the then Attorney General of India, Mr. K. Parasaran (respondent No. 1 herein) under Section 26(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and authorisation from the Chief Vigilance Officer of the Department of Atomic Energy Mr. S.K. Bhandarkar (respondent No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2004

People's Union for Civil Liberties and Anr. Vs. Union of India (UOi) a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-06-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 10, 19, 19(1), 19(2) and 226; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 23, 27, 30 and 136; Radiation Protection Rules, 1971; Atomic Energy (Working of Mines, Minerals and Handling of Prescribed Substances) Rules; Atomic Energy (Safe Disposal and Radioactive Wastes) Rules, 1987; Atomic Energy (Factories) Rules, 1996; Atomic Energy (Control of Irradiation of Food) Rules, 1996; Evidence Act - Sections 123 and 162; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166

Reported in : AIR2004SC1442; (2004)2CALLT39(SC); JT2004(1)SC152; 2004(1)SCALE91; (2004)2SCC476; 2004(2)LC836(SC); [2004] 1 SCR 232

programme, qualifications and licensing policies for personnel by the project/ plants; Enforcing rules and regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 for radiation safety in the country and such other functions as specified therein.5. With the said counter affidavit, … their counter affidavit, the respondents herein inter alia contended that the said Board was constituted in terms of Section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act entrusting the task to develop Safety Codes, Guides and Standards for siting, … alia contended that the said Board was constituted in terms of Section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act entrusting the task to develop Safety Codes,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2013

Novartis Ag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2013

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3(d)(b), 2(1)(d), 133, 24(A), 25(1), 2(8)(10), 14, 5, 10; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Section 20(1); Patents and Designs Act, 1911

in respect of an invention relating to atomic energy falling within sub-section (1) of section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).Section 5. Inventions where only methods or processes of manufacture patentable.- In the case of inventions-a) … the “priority date”. On July 18, 1997, Switzerland was not one of the “Convention Countries” as defined under section 2 (1)(d) read with section 133 of the Act and it was notified as a convention country as per

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 12 2004

Andhra Bank Vs. B. Satyanarayana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-12-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Bank (Officers') Service Regulations, 1982 - Regulation 17 and 17(1); Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 - Sections 8, 12(1), 12(2) and 19; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 13, 14 and 18; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC4007; JT2004(2)SC312; (2004)IILLJ5SC; 2004(2)SCALE446; (2004)2SCC657; 2004(2)SLJ227(SC); (2004)2UPLBEC2109

and Ors. : AIR2004SC1442 , this Court while rejecting a similar contention as regard Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 held:'The question as to whether a statute is ultra vires Constitution of India having conferred unguided, uncanalised or … all relevant times were holding the posts of Regional Manager. They along with the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein were considered for promotion to the post of Assistant General Manager upon following the procedures laid down

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2012

Lok Nayak Hospital Paramedical and Technical Employees Union Near MaIn ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-30-2012

Subject : Education

as per the Notification issued by the respondents. 9.   Heard. 10.  Clause (h) of sub Section (1) of Section 2 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 defines X-ray to be radiation within the Act.  Sub Section (e) of … the Safety Code laid down by the Atomic  Energy Regulatory Board (AERB, in short) in terms of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, and is also violative of the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission, which were accepted and Gazette notified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1998

Mukand Ltd. and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-23-1998

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 3; Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 - Sections 2(5), 24 and 64(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Raj173

24 and 64 (1)(f) read with Schedule-Ill of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act. 1953 and Section 3(d) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. Section 64(1)(f) of theAcl of 1953 enables the Gram Panchayat to charge octroi duty if the goods are brought … within the Panchayat Circle for consumption or use therein. The Panchayal Circle is defined in Sub-section (5) of Section 2 of the Act, which means the local area over which the Panchayat exercises jurisdiction. Section 3(d) of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2005

The Central Intelligence Officer Vs. the Commissioner of Inquiry (Mara ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 5(2) to 5(5), 6, 8, 8B, 8C and 12; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 40(2); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 3; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18; Kerala Commission of Inquiry Rules, 1958 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15 and 16; Commissions of Inquiry (Central) Rules, 1972; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4 - Order 11, Rule 1 - Order 16, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 77(3), 372 and 395; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 102, 103 and 482

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2944; 2005(2)KLT927

the Rules framed under the above said Act. He also invited our attention to Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.32. Now we shall consider how far the privilege claimed by the State as well as the Central Intelligence … K. Padmanabhan Nair, J.1. W.A. No. 518 of 2004 is filed by the Joint Deputy Director, Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau, Trivandrum challenging an interim order passed by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2005

Citizens for a Just Society, Through Its Vice President, K. Pullaiah V ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-28-2005

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 13, 18 and 27; Official Secrets Act, 1923

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR20; 2005(5)BomCR316

The apex Court was satisfied that the order issued by the Central Government under Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and its claim of privilege do not suffer from any legal infirmity warranting interference with the High Court … petition is regarding the apprehension expressed arising from the post- Tsunami concern. According to the petitioners, on December 26, 2004, Tsunami devastated the east and west coasts of southern India and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2002

West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. C.E.S.C. Ltd. Etc. E ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2002

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 4, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 22(1), 26, 27, 29, 29(2), 29(3), 29(4), 29(5), 29(6), 30, 37, 50 and 52; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3(2); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 44, 44(3), 46, 49, 57, 57A, 57B, 58, 58(2), 59 and 76(2); Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission (Appointment of Chairperson and Members Functions, Budget and Annual Report) Rules, 1999 - Rule 4; West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2000 - Regulations 18, 24, 30, 31, 32 and 42; Contempt of Courts Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Companies Act, 1956; RDB Act - Sections 34; Finance Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 46B; Si

Reported in : AIR2002SC3588; [2003(1)JCR194(SC)]; JT2002(7)SC578; 2002(7)SCALE217; (2002)8SCC715; MANU/SC/0859/2002

overriding effect over this Act to only two other enactments, namely, the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. While Section 52 gives overriding effect to the provisions of the 1998 Act, notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith, in … tariff for the sale of electricity by the Calcutta Electricity Supply Company Ltd. (the Company) for the year 2000-2001 and 2001-2002. Being aggrieved by the said determination of tariff, the Company preferred an appeal before the High

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2008

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 2(29), 2(32), 2(67), 2(72), 2(73), 2(77), 39(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 173, 174, 175, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 12 to 19 and 51; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42 and 51; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; The Works of Licensees Rules, 2006; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ703

effect subject to Section 173 of the Act, which relates to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989. The provisions are also stated to be in addition to and not in … counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, with regard to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial