Advanced Search Results

People's Union for Civil Liberties and Anr. Vs. Union of India (UOi) a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 10, 19, 19(1), 19(2) and 226; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 23, 27, 30 and 136; Radiation Protection Rules, 1971; Atomic Energy (Working of Mines, Minerals and Handling of Prescribed Substances) Rules; Atomic Energy (Safe Disposal and Radioactive Wastes) Rules, 1987; Atomic Energy (Factories) Rules, 1996; Atomic Energy (Control of Irradiation of Food) Rules, 1996; Evidence Act - Sections 123 and 162; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166

Reported in : AIR2004SC1442; (2004)2CALLT39(SC); JT2004(1)SC152; 2004(1)SCALE91; (2004)2SCC476; 2004(2)LC836(SC); [2004] 1 SCR 232

programme, qualifications and licensing policies for personnel by the project/ plants; Enforcing rules and regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 for radiation safety in the country and such other functions as specified therein.5. With the said counter affidavit, … of minerals) as the Central Government considers necessary or expedient for the exercise of the foregoing powers.' 15. Section 16 provides for control over radioactive substances. Section 17 provides for the rule making power of the Central Government

The Central Intelligence Officer Vs. the Commissioner of Inquiry (Mara ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 5(2) to 5(5), 6, 8, 8B, 8C and 12; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 40(2); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 3; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18; Kerala Commission of Inquiry Rules, 1958 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15 and 16; Commissions of Inquiry (Central) Rules, 1972; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4 - Order 11, Rule 1 - Order 16, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 77(3), 372 and 395; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 102, 103 and 482

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2944; 2005(2)KLT927

the Rules framed under the above said Act. He also invited our attention to Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.32. Now we shall consider how far the privilege claimed by the State as well as the Central Intelligence … in connection with the Marad Incidents' and also Ext.P2 order of the Commission of Inquiry (Marad Incidents) dated 16.2.2004 by which the Commission of Inquiry had rejected the privilege claimed by the petitioner-appellant under Sections 123 arid

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

been filed on the grounds that the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) constituted under Section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 is empowered to review from the safety angle before the commissioning of the Atomic Energy Project and it … not to foreclose an adjudication on merits of substantial rights of citizens under personal, property or other laws. 16. Though the Courts entertaining PIL enjoy a degree of flexibility unknown to the trial of traditional court litigation

G. Sundarrajan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to have a comprehensive legislation dealing with Atomic Energy, consequently, Act 29 of 1948 was repealed and the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962) (in short the Act) was enacted which came into force on 29.01.1962. The Act has … people of India and for other peaceful purposes. The Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 27 of the Act, constituted the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) vide notification dated 15.11.1983 to carry out … 15.11.1983 to carry out certain regulatory and safety functions envisaged under Sections 16, 17 and 23 of the Act. The AERB have powers to lay

Electronics Corporation of India Limited Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

to inspection of the writ petitioner-factory is covered in terms and in accordance with Section 23 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and hence the respondents -State and its officials in its Factories department have no right of inspection. Before … is Section 14 which conferred complete control over production and use of atomic energy upon the Central Government. Section 16 empowered the Central Government to prohibit any manufacture, possession, use, transfer by sale or otherwise, export and import

G.Sundarrajan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to have a comprehensive legislation dealing with Atomic Energy, consequently, Act 29 of 1948 was repealed and the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962) (in short the Act) was enacted which came into force on 29.01.1962. The Act has … people of India and for other peaceful purposes. The Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 27 of the Act, constituted the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) vide notification dated 15.11.1983 to carry out … 15.11.1983 to carry out certain regulatory and safety functions envisaged under Sections 16, 17 and 23 of the Act. The AERB have powers to lay

Raytheon Company Vs. the Controller of Patents and Designs and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Section 20(1) and 20(6); ;Patent Act, 1970 - Sections 65, 80, 116 and 116(1); ;Patent Rules - Rule 21

Reported in : AIR1974Cal336

patent could not be granted. The said opinion was expressed under the provisions of Section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act 1962. The relevant portions of the section, inter alia, provide as follows:--'Sec. 20. Special provisions as to inventions -- … decision, order or direction of the Controller under any of the following provisions, that is to say,Section 15, Section 16, Section 17, Section 18, Section 19, Section 20, Section 25, Section 27, Section 28, Section 51, Section 54,

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 2(29), 2(32), 2(67), 2(72), 2(73), 2(77), 39(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 173, 174, 175, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 12 to 19 and 51; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42 and 51; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; The Works of Licensees Rules, 2006; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ703

effect subject to Section 173 of the Act, which relates to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989. The provisions are also stated to be in addition to and not in … the owners of the property are entitled for compensation as per the procedure for payment of compensation under Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and therefore, it is not as if the petitioner has no remedy

M.R. Govindan and Another Vs. The District Collector, Kancheepuram

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

sensitive in the context of the national security and also the security of humanity like uranium - the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 only provides under Section 5 for prohibition or regulation of mining activity in such mineral. Under Section 10 … 1957 also recognizes the right /power of the State Government in respect of the minerals vide Section 10, 16(1)(b), 17A and vide Rule 27(1)(m), 59 and 60 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. The Petitioner, subsequent to

Yash Thomas Mannully Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Academic Energy Regulatory Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board') which is constituted under W.P.C.No.27960/2011 :2: the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. It is contended that the Board being the sole regulator and enforcement agency for the use of atomic … day of August 2015 JUDGMENT Shaffique, J This public interest litigation is filed challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 3(1), 4(2) and proviso, 4(4), 5, 6, 9(2), 15(2),16(5), 18(b), 19, 20, 32(10), 35 and 38(1) of the