Advanced Search Results

People's Union for Civil Liberties and Anr. Vs. Union of India (UOi) a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 10, 19, 19(1), 19(2) and 226; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 23, 27, 30 and 136; Radiation Protection Rules, 1971; Atomic Energy (Working of Mines, Minerals and Handling of Prescribed Substances) Rules; Atomic Energy (Safe Disposal and Radioactive Wastes) Rules, 1987; Atomic Energy (Factories) Rules, 1996; Atomic Energy (Control of Irradiation of Food) Rules, 1996; Evidence Act - Sections 123 and 162; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166

Reported in : AIR2004SC1442; (2004)2CALLT39(SC); JT2004(1)SC152; 2004(1)SCALE91; (2004)2SCC476; 2004(2)LC836(SC); [2004] 1 SCR 232

programme, qualifications and licensing policies for personnel by the project/ plants; Enforcing rules and regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 for radiation safety in the country and such other functions as specified therein.5. With the said counter affidavit, … their counter affidavit, the respondents herein inter alia contended that the said Board was constituted in terms of Section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act entrusting the task to develop Safety Codes, Guides and Standards for siting, … S.B. Sinha, J.INTRODUCTION:1. Right of information is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The State under Clause (2) of Article 19 of

Lok Nayak Hospital Paramedical and Technical Employees Union Near MaIn ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

to be appointed, as per the Notification issued by the respondents. 9.   Heard. 10.  Clause (h) of sub Section (1) of Section 2 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 defines X-ray to be radiation within the Act.  Sub … the Safety Code laid down by the Atomic  Energy Regulatory Board (AERB, in short) in terms of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, and is also violative of the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission, which were accepted and Gazette notified

Novartis Ag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3(d)(b), 2(1)(d), 133, 24(A), 25(1), 2(8)(10), 14, 5, 10; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Section 20(1); Patents and Designs Act, 1911

in respect of an invention relating to atomic energy falling within sub-section (1) of section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).Section 5. Inventions where only methods or processes of manufacture patentable.- In the case of inventions-a)

Andhra Bank Vs. B. Satyanarayana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Bank (Officers') Service Regulations, 1982 - Regulation 17 and 17(1); Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 - Sections 8, 12(1), 12(2) and 19; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 13, 14 and 18; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC4007; JT2004(2)SC312; (2004)IILLJ5SC; 2004(2)SCALE446; (2004)2SCC657; 2004(2)SLJ227(SC); (2004)2UPLBEC2109

and Ors. : AIR2004SC1442 , this Court while rejecting a similar contention as regard Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 held:'The question as to whether a statute is ultra vires Constitution of India having conferred unguided, uncanalised or … order dated 31.3.1998 passed by a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Appeal No. 1152 of 1988 whereby and whereunder an appeal preferred by the appellant herein against a judgment and order dated

Indian Industrial Mineral Producers Welfare Association Vs. Government ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4 and 5; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(3) and 66A; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 5; Atomic Energy (Working of the Mines, Minerals and Handling of the Prescribed Substances) Rules, 1984 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD471; 2005(3)ALT61

Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short 'MMRD Act') and the Rules made thereunder, apart from the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and the Rules framed thereunder.2. It is stated that India has large reserves of beach sand minerals in … minerals separation of prescribed substances. So, the grant of lease under the impugned G.O. contravenes the provisions of Section 4 of MMRD Act. Therefore, the mining lease granted in favour of 4th respondent is illegal. It is … contrary to the provisions of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short 'MMRD Act') and the Rules made thereunder, apart from the

The Central Intelligence Officer Vs. the Commissioner of Inquiry (Mara ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 5(2) to 5(5), 6, 8, 8B, 8C and 12; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 40(2); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 3; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18; Kerala Commission of Inquiry Rules, 1958 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15 and 16; Commissions of Inquiry (Central) Rules, 1972; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4 - Order 11, Rule 1 - Order 16, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 77(3), 372 and 395; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 102, 103 and 482

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2944; 2005(2)KLT927

the Rules framed under the above said Act. He also invited our attention to Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.32. Now we shall consider how far the privilege claimed by the State as well as the Central Intelligence … in connection with the Marad Incidents' and also Ext.P2 order of the Commission of Inquiry (Marad Incidents) dated 16.2.2004 by which the Commission of Inquiry had rejected the privilege claimed by the petitioner-appellant under Sections 123 arid

Raytheon Company Vs. the Controller of Patents and Designs and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Section 20(1) and 20(6); ;Patent Act, 1970 - Sections 65, 80, 116 and 116(1); ;Patent Rules - Rule 21

Reported in : AIR1974Cal336

patent could not be granted. The said opinion was expressed under the provisions of Section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act 1962. The relevant portions of the section, inter alia, provide as follows:--'Sec. 20. Special provisions as to inventions -- … Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This is an appeal to the High Court under the Patents Act, 1970. The order challenged in this appeal is regarding the application for Patent No. 133687 filed on November 19,

Dr. Buddhi Kota Subbarao Vs. K.Parasaran and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18, 19 and 26(2); Indian Penel Code, 1860 - Sections 120B, 193, 195 and 196

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)133; AIR1996SC2687; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)134; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)271; 1996CriLJ3983; 1996(3)Crimes143(SC); JT1996(7)SC265; 1996(5)SCALE797; (1996)5SCC530; [1996]Supp4SCR5

the then Attorney General of India, Mr. K. Parasaran (respondent No. 1 herein) under Section 26(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and authorisation from the Chief Vigilance Officer of the Department of Atomic Energy Mr. S.K. Bhandarkar (respondent No.

Mukand Ltd. and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 3; Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 - Sections 2(5), 24 and 64(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Raj173

24 and 64 (1)(f) read with Schedule-Ill of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act. 1953 and Section 3(d) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. Section 64(1)(f) of theAcl of 1953 enables the Gram Panchayat to charge octroi duty if the goods are brought

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

been filed on the grounds that the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) constituted under Section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 is empowered to review from the safety angle before the commissioning of the Atomic Energy Project and it … COMMON ORDER P. JYOTHIMANI,J. The issue involved in all these cases relates to the commissioning of Units 1 and 2 of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project (for brevity, "KNPP"). Even though the prayers in these writ petitions