Advanced Search Results
Capt. Satendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-07-2002
Service
Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 13A
2002(2)AWC1293; [2002(93)FLR555]
this impugned order, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition before this Court.4. Rule 13A of the Army Rules. 1954, states as follows :'13-A Termination of service of an officer by the Central Government on his failure to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.C. Chandel Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
Nov-05-2001
Service
Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 13, 13A, 15 and 15A; Army Act - Sections 13-A and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16
96(2002)DLT174
1981 SC 947, wherein the services of the officers were terminated in terms of Rule 15A of the Army Rules, 1954. Rule 15A is also on the same parameter and identical to Rule 13A so far as the requirement of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCapt. Sunil Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Jan-09-2009
Service
Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 13A
156(2009)DLT386
Short Service Commission. The action of the respondents in releasing the petitioner by invoking Rule 13A of the Army Rules, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the said Rules) is alleged to be not sustainable. The relevant Rule reads as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. CaptaIn Jagpal Singh
Supreme Court of India
Jul-29-1997
Service
Army Rules - Rule 13A
JT1997(7)SC66; 1997(5)SCALE261; (1997)11SCC512; 1997(2)LC467(SC)
the circumstances, parties are directed to bear their own costs. Service - compulsory retirement - Rule 13A of Army Rules, 1954 - setting aside of Order of compulsory retirement challenged - compulsory retirement made on account of failure of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Capt. Satendra Kumar
Supreme Court of India
Jul-18-2006
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 13A; Defence Service Regulations
JT2006(7)SC202; 2006(7)SCALE200; (2006)9SCC570; 2007(1)SLJ258(SC)
was commissioned on 9.6.1984 as an Officer in the Indian Army. In terms of Rule 13-A of the Army Rules, 1954 (in short the 'Rules') read with para 79 of the Defence Service Regulations (in short the 'Regulations') all … set aside. The appeal is allowed. No costs. Civil - Army - Promotional examination - Erroneous Representation - Rule 13A of the Army Rules, 1954 and Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950 - Original rule required the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovernment of India, Rep. by Secretary, Ministry of Defence and ors. V ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-21-1994
Service
Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 13A, 13A(1) and 13A(3)
1994(3)ALT213
Rath, J.1. The question raised in this appeal is as to the interpretation of Rule 13-A of the Army Rules of 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). The respondents in the Writ Petition are the appellants. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaipal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Aug-16-2007
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69 and 70; Border Security Force Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 11 to 15, 15A, 16, 16A, 16B, 17 and 22
146(2008)DLT337; 2009(1)SLJ440(Delhi)
the Order of Termination/Dismissal passed by their Commandant vide Orders dated 6.8.1997 passed under Rule 13(3)(iii)(v) of the Army Rules, 1954 (Rules for short). It has further been prayed that the Respondents be directed to reinstate the Petitioners into … to Chapter-IIII of the Rules dealing with the Dismissal, Discharge etc. Rules 11 to 13 deal with Discharge; Rule 13A to 15 with Termination; Rule 15A with Release on Medical Grounds; Rule 16 with Release; Rule 16A and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›