Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Dinesh Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 14, 17, 46, 64, 70, 70(1), 70(2), 70(3), 70(4), 70(5), 74, 117, 117(2) and 141; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 165; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 99, 99(1) and 133 to 161; Army Rules - Rule 66(1)

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE396

the Chief of the Army Staff confirming the proceedings of the court martial under Section 164 of the Army Act, 1950 was illegal since no reason had been given in support of the order by the Chief of the … this juncture that in the same Rules, Chapter IX deals with the procedure for Security Force Courts. Rule 99, which is included in Chapter IX, is of importance for the decision in these appeals. Before its amendment

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

2 provides that the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, … and all other consequential details will have to be clearly spelt out. 99. The suggestions that we have made in respect of appointments to Tribunals … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

Ex. Sep. Shambhu Singh Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

be appropriate to reproduce the charge sheet, by which the appellant was tried by the SCM. It reads: ARMY ACT 1950 SECTION 39(b) WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE OVERSTAYING LEAVE GRANTED TO HIM in that he, at field on 16 Oct 97 … and School Lucknow from 31 May 98 (FN) until voluntarily rejoined at Military Hospital Jabalpur on 05 Feb 99 (AN). To substantiate its contention with regard to overstayal of leave by the appellant and absenting himself without

R.K. Talukdar (ic-35161f Lt. Co.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Jurisdiction) Rules, 1978, (hereafter referred to as the Rules) as well as Sections 125 and 126 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereafter referred to as the Act) contending that at all relevant times, he had been in active service … Battalion NCC, he was attached to 222 Advance Base Ordinance Depot, C/o 99 APO vide order No. 5008/8/A dated 23.8.2004 for the period 19.7.2004 to … learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate(s) No. 1, Guwahati, in GR Case No. 5424/04 drawing cognizance of the offences under Section 448/376/506 IPC against the petitioner as well as the order dated 28.6.2005 issuing a non-bailable warrant of arrest

ic-42417 F. Major T.K. Chatterjee Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Mizoram Liquor Total Prohibition Act, 1995 - Sections 7, 8, 8(1), 24, 45, 50, 51 and 54(3); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 100, 100(4) and 100(5); Evidence Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107 and 108; Constitution of India - Articles 33 and 226; Mizoram Liquor Total Prohibition Rules

7.6. The respondent authority invoked jurisdiction for trial of the petitioner as provided in Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950. The provisions contained therein provide for punishment of any person subject to this Act who at any place … ACT, IN CONSEQUENCE OF WHICH ABETMENT SUCH OFFENCE WAS COMMITTED,is that he,at field on or about 12 Aug 99, conspired with No. 3990593P Nk Pushpender Singh of his unit to illegally transport liquor from Masimpur to Aizawl

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

read with Section 13 (2) of the PC Act without following the procedure under Section 126 of the Army Act, 1950. The Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court discussed the provisions of the Army Act and other

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … list. Accordingly, despite their performance, the meritorious women candidates are not being selected only due to their gender. 99. Consequently, this Court is of the view that in the present case, indirect discrimination is real and is

Gulab Chandra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

of on 12.3.01 allowing him to file a petition before a competent authority under Section 164 of the Army Act, 1950 and directing the competent authority to dispose of the petition within 2 months from the date of receipt … and communicated on 5.6.99 to the petitioner which reads as follows:In that he, at field, on 31st March 99, abetted Number 143715 Rifleman Safai Raj Kumar of the same Unit to carry 30 Kgs of Ganja in

V.P. Airy Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3(21)

Reported in : ILR1993Delhi255

the post of Director General Assam Rifles is not a deputation post. (16) Under Section 4 of the Army Act, 1950 the Central Government is empowered to issue Notification and apply, with or without modifications, all of any of … case was put before Cabinet Committee and posting was done after obtaining approval of Cabinet Committee. Further Regulation 99 provides that subject to the approval of the Ministry of defense the Chief of Army Staff is empowered

Ex. Rect. Lachhman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 39, 80 and 120(3); ;Army Rule, 1954 - Rules 22, 22(1), 115, 115(2), 115(2A), 129 and 180

Reported in : 2003(1)SLJ237(Delhi)

the charge. Next that though the petitioner was served with a charge sheet under Section 39(a) of the Army Act, 1950, but was not given any opportunity to take help of a legal practitioner as the trial was of … that he, at Nasik Road absented himself without leave from Unit Lines at 0330 hr on 13 Jun 99 until he rejoined voluntarily at 1600 hr on 27 Jun 99 at Arty Centre, Nasik Road Camp.(Total period