Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: army act 1950 section 98 · Page 1 of about 110 results (0.047 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 25 2010

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Criminal

2 provides that the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, … been answered in paragraphs 77, 79, 80,81, 82, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 100 and 101, which are being extracted below:77. To express our opinion … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2007

Mehar Singh Manhas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-18-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(2)ShimLC212

sent to perform his duties with 53 Infantry Brigade. The petitioner was charged under Section 41(1) of the Army Act, 1950 for the alleged misconduct as reproduced below:He at field, on 1 June, 98, when ordered by IC-41475Y Maj

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1998

Lt. Col. B.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-20-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 26, 27 and 33

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT181

in the case of the petitioner. The learned Counsel referred to Sections 26, 27 and 33 of the Army Act, 1950. 11. Section 26 provides for remedy of aggrieved persons other than .officers. The provisions give right to such … As per the policy in vogue,officer may be allowed to proceed on voluntary retirement witheffect from 31st Dec., 98. (2) Since the officer desires to settle down in Delhi, he may be allowed to draw his pension

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 29 2007

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Bir Bahadur Chhetri

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-29-2007

Subject : Service

given rise to the present appeal, is the writ petitioner's dismissal from service, under Section 20 of the Army Act, 1950, on the ground that the writ petitioner, a member of the Assam Rifles, which is a paramilitary force, … petitioner from service. The order of dismissal, so passed, read as follows:Headquarters Nagaland Range (North) Assam Rifles C/O 98 APON 211/1/98/929 04 Mar. 98 No. 102999Y Hav/GD Bir Bahadur Chhetri 10 Assam Rifles.C/099 APOOrders by IC-23358L Brig

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2006

Nripen Sarma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Subject : Service

Commanding Officer that he would be tried by the Summary Court Martial (SCM) for the offence committed under Army Act, 1950 (Section 46A). Copies of the summary of evidence and additional summary of evidence along with the charge sheet were … patient in the family ward of 165 Military Hospital. Sd/- (Ved Rattan) Colonel Commanding OfficerPlace: FieldDated: 29 January 985. After the aforesaid developments the Summary Court Martial was held and according to the petitioner the respondents No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2008

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Sps Vains (Retd.) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-09-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Pension Rules; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 106(2008)CLT794(SC); JT2008(10)SC399; 2008(12)SCALE360; 2009(1)SLJ287(SC); 2008AIRSCW6425; 2008(6)Supreme582

revision of pay scales with effect from 1.1.1996 - Appeal dismissed. [para 16, 26, 30, 31 ] - ARMY ACT, 1950. Section 22 & Special Army Instruction 2/S/98, Clause 12(c): [Altamas Kabir & Markandey Katju, JJ] Pension -Disparity between holders

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2011

Union of India Through Its Secretary, and ors. Vs. Rabinder Singh.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-29-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 177; Army Act, 1950 - Section 191

to make a report under Rule 177 of the Army Rules, 1954 framed under Section 191 of the Army Act, 1950. On conclusion of the inquiry a disciplinary action was directed against the respondent. (ii) Thereafter, the summary of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2018

Union of India Vs. Col Ran Singh Dudee

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-03-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

career, he received some commendations and appreciations. However, the respondent was summarily tried under Section 83 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by Commander, 29 Artillery Brigade for the offence of ‘absenting himself without

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2025

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-2025

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … their performance, the meritorious women candidates are not being selected only due to their gender. [Paras 93, 95, 98] Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14, 15,16 - Constitution and Government Policy towards Women - Discussed. [Paras

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2011

Ex. Sep. Shambhu Singh Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the said leave until voluntarily rejoined at Adm Bn AMC Centre and School Lucknow on 27 May 98 (AN). ARMY ACT 1950 SECTION 39(a) ABSENTING HIMSELF WITHOUT LEAVE in that he, atLucknow absented himself without leave … be appropriate to reproduce the charge sheet, by which the appellant was tried by the SCM. It reads: ARMY ACT 1950 SECTION 39(b) WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE OVERSTAYING LEAVE GRANTED TO HIM in that he, at field on 16 Oct 97

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial