Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: army act 1950 section 96 · Page 1 of about 132 results (0.034 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 06 2006

Major Anurag Pathak Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-06-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 57 and 71; Army Rules - Rule 149; Evidence Act - Sections 45; Defence Service Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR228

against him and charges were framed on 18/7/1998 for the offences under Sections 52(f) and 57(a) of the Army Act, 1950. The General Court Martial convicted the petitioner for the first and the fifth charge i.e. under Sections 52(f) … 1998 a Court Martial was ordered against him and charges were framed on 18/7/1998 for the offences under Sections 52(f) and 57(a) of the Army Act, 1950. The General Court Martial convicted the petitioner for the first … with intent to defraud put his right thumb impression against serial No. 96, in respect of Shri Fransis s/o. Johanan in form BRDB-19 General Reserve

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2010

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Criminal

2 provides that the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, … particular Tribunal is challenged) by overlooking the jurisdiction of the concerned Tribunal. 96. The directions issued by us in respect of making the decisions of … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … R. Venkata Rao v. Secretary of State 0043/1936 , the Privy Council dealing with the scope of Section 96-B of the Government of India Act, 1919 took the view that redressal was not obtainable by Courts for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 04 1951

R. Chatterjee Vs. Sub Area Commander H.Q. Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-04-1951

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Army Act, 1911 - Sections 2 and 2(2); Constitution of India - Articles 33, 35 and 372

Reported in : AIR1951Mad777; (1951)1MLJ258

Act of 1911. In parenthesis it may be stated that Act No. XLVI [46] of 1950 designated the Army Act, 1950 which came into force on 22-6-1950, though it has no direct appln. to the present case, can also … & not the terms of contract as alleged by the petnr. is evident from a perusal of various sections of the Army Act. It has also to be noted that the so-called contract as contained in annexure … unless sanctioned by statute has any legal effect.'In para. 74 at p. 96, Military Forces of the Crown by C. M. Clode, vol. II, it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2004

Veer Bhan (Sepoy) Vs. the Chief of the Army Staff and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-01-2004

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 115, 161 and 162; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 2A, 33, 33(7), 34, 70, 115(2), 132 and 147; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT667

dated 11th July, 1994 whereby the petitioner was found guilty of the charge under Section 52(b) of the Army Act, 1950 and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of four months and dismissal from service.2. The petitioner joined the Indian … provided with a copy of the summary of evidence or an abstract of the evidence, not less than 96 hours or on active service 24 hours before his trial. These have to be provided free of charge.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2011

Ex. Sep. Shambhu Singh Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

be appropriate to reproduce the charge sheet, by which the appellant was tried by the SCM. It reads: ARMY ACT 1950 SECTION 39(b) WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE OVERSTAYING LEAVE GRANTED TO HIM in that he, at field on 16 Oct 97

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2002

Daya Shankar Tiwari Vs. Chief of the Army Staff, New Delhi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-05-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3) and 106; Army Rules - Rule 17

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2142; (2002)2UPLBEC1634

such, he was declared deserter with effect from 2.5.1996. A Court of Inquiry was heldunder Section 106 of Army Act, 1950 and being a peace deserter, the petitioner was dismissed from service w.e.f. 21.10.1999 in terms of Army Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1998

Haryana Engineering and Foundry Works Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 1

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ172

the amount in Court on 10-4-96. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1997

Sumitra Sahai Vs. Arya Orphanage

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-02-1997

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 1997VAD(Delhi)593; 68(1997)DLT793; 1997(43)DRJ227

permitted to be raised in replication. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2001

Durga Nath Sharma and anr. Vs. Shyam Shanker Goela

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-2001

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96; Indian Contract Act - Sections 23; Delhi Development Act; Delhi Co-operative Societies Rules - Rule 34-A; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act - Sections 27(1)

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT545; 2002(61)DRJ848

conveyance--Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial