Advanced Search Results
Ram Murti Wadhwa Vs. Union of India Etc.
Delhi
May-24-1976
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 101; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 95(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
ILR1976Delhi691
concerned. (62) For these reasons we would dismiss the appeal but make no order as to costs. (i) Army Act (1950) - Sections 101, 102 & 191--Court of Inquiry--who could order-whether the Commandant or the Colonel in charge (Admn.)--accused … officer' during the court-martial. The relevant rule in this behalf is rule 95. '95.Defending officer and friend of accused. (1) At any general or district … (the rules) framed by the Government of India, Ministry of defense, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 191 of the Act. The procedure of trial by a general court-martial in broad outlines is this. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-25-2010
Criminal
2 provides that the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, … This power is available to Parliament under Entries 77, 78, 79 and 95 of List I and to the State Legislature under Entry 65 of … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMajor G.S. Sodhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Supreme Court of India
Nov-30-1990
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 109, 154 to 156, 164(1), 191, 192 and 193; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22 to 25, 28 to 32, 62, 65, 77(1), 95 to 101 and 191 to 193; Evidence Act, 1872; Army Regulations, 1987
AIR1991SC1617; 1991CriLJ1947; [1992(65)FLR484]; JT1991(5)SC55; (1991)2SCC382
relevant provisions of the Army Act and the Rules. The Army Act came into force in the year 1950. Chapters VI and VII deal with the offences and punishment's respectively and the corresponding sections are from 34 … submissions it becomes necessary to state few more facts and then refer to the relevant provisions of the Army Act and Rules.5. The petitioner became a Commissioned Officer of the Army on 30th April, 1972. On 30th April, … 70 deals with confirmation and Rule 71 with promulgation. As per Rule 95 the accused is permitted to be defended by an officer called defending … and VII deal with the offences and punishment's respectively and the corresponding sections are from 34 to 89. Chapter X provides for convening of court-martial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
Matched in: Citation 95(2002)DLT770
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-11-2025
Education
[2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241
by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241 : 2025 INSC 954Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. v. The Union of India & Ors. (Writ Petition (C) No. 772 of 2023) 11
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Major A. HussaIn (ic-14827)
Supreme Court of India
Dec-08-1997
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 63 and 191; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22(1), 23, 24, 25, 47, 81, 82, 95, 96, 105, 149, 177, 180 and 184
AIR1998SC577; JT1997(9)SC676; 1996LabIC581; (1996)ILLJ781SC; 1995(6)SCALE214; (1998)1SCC537; 1998(1)LC165(SC); (1998)1UPLBEC330
him including the confirmation of sentence passed upon him by the court-martial.2. A General Court-Martial (GCM) under the Army Act, 1950 (for short 'the Act') was convened to try the respondent holding the rank of Major in the Army … is to be provided to the respondent in terms of Army Rule 95, The services of none of the named officers could be provided to … rank of Major in the Army on the following charge:'Charge-Sheet'The accused IC-14827F Major Arshad Hussain, 225 Ground Liaison Section Type 'C' attached to AOC center, an Officer holding a permanent commission in the Regular Army, is charged
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarminder Kumar (Cap.) Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Sep-08-1998
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 122 - Rule 14(2)
1998VIAD(Delhi)368; 75(1998)DLT597
writ petition the show-cause notice dated 28.2.1984 issued under Army Rule 14 read with Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950.2. The case of the petitioner is that having come to the conclusion that the proceeding with court martial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMajor General Inder Jit Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-20-1997
Service
Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 13, 24, 28(2), 30, 31, 33(7), 38, 67, 95, 180 and 184; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 63, 71, 72, 73, 109, 117; Army Law
JT1997(4)SC8; 1997(3)SCALE111; (1997)9SCC1
Pradesh challenging the inquiry proceedings held against him and his trial by a General Court Martial under the Army Act, 1950. This writ petition has been dismissed by the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Madhya … The tentative charges which were framed on or about 28.10.1989 were twelve in number. Each Charge was under Section 52 of the Army Act and in the alternative, under Section 63 of the Army Act. Section 52(b)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubedar Kashmira Singh Vs. Government of India, Rep. by Its Secretary, ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-18-1997
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 55, 63, 90, 93 and 95; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 137; Service Law
1997(2)ALD(Cri)42; 1997(2)ALT311
the action tantamounted to double jeopardy, violative of Article 20 of the Constitution and Section 121 of the Army Act, 1950, for short 'the Act', and Rule 53 of the Rules; summary of evidence was recorded contrary to the … issued to the petitioner under Section 63 on 9-3-1990. It reads:CHARGE-SHEETThe accused, Shri Kashmira Singh, formerly number JC 95036 F Subedar (TA) Kashmira Singh, 2 Training Regiment, Artillery Centre Hyderabad, now attached to 2 Training Regiment, Artillery
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKulwant Singh (Nk.) S/O Sardar Sadhu Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India ...
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-24-1991
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 33, 226, 227 and 227(4); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 37, 38, 109, 130, 131; Army Rules, 1954 - Sections 39(2), 41, 44, 45, 48 and 95(2); Military Law; Evidence Act - Sections 154
1991(0)MPLJ985
for alleged offences said to have been committed by them Under Sections 37(c), 38(1) and 63 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').4. In the Sikh Regiment Centre at Ramgarh on 10-6-1984 soldiers waged a … of the petitioners in Court Martial proceedings for alleged offences said to have been committed by them Under Sections 37(c), 38(1) and 63 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').4. In the Sikh
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »