Advanced Search Results

Ex. Rfn. Hoshiar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Pay and Allowance Regulation Rules, 1955 - Rule 51; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 178 and 179; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 34, 38, 39, 80, 91 and 92; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 173, 186, 187 and 189; Army Regulations - Regulations 178 to 187 and 196 to 200; Defence Services Regulations - Regulations 51 and 123; Civil Services Regulations

Reported in : (2006)144PLR97

are extracted below the facility of reference:Regulation 51: FORFEITURE OF PAY AND ALLOWANCES51. A person, subject to the Army Act, 1950 will forfeit his pay and allowances (including expatriation allowance) for every day (as defined in Section 92 of

R. Santosh Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 498A; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 80, 91, 92, 93 and 94; Army Regulations - Regulation 51

Reported in : 115(2004)DLT279

Army Act, 1950, will forfeit his pay and allowances (including expatriation allowance) for every day (as defined in Section 92 of that Act) of:-xx xx xx(e) Imprisonment awarded by a criminal court, or imprisonment or field punishment awarded … Note 2 thereto as appears in the Manual of Indian Military Law read with Section 93 of the Army Act, 1950. According to the respondents the claim of the petitioner for payment of pay and allowances could be conveniently

Glaxo India Ltd., a Pharmaceutical Company Vs. Mr. C. Gupta and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92-A; Industrial Employment Standing Order Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 153; M.P. Industrial Relations Act

Reported in : 1999(2)ALLMR482; 1999(3)BomCR401; (1999)2BOMLR758; [1999(82)FLR389]; (1999)IILLJ718Bom; 1999(2)MhLj410

does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950 or theNavy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or … employee was part of managerial staff and therefore he would not be a workman as per definition under section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Needless to say, according to the employee, he is a workman … Motor Vehicles Act. No fault liability was introduced by way of section 92-A in the old Act, and the incident had happened prior to the

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

the Union of India shall allocate not less than 50% of the vacancies to women candidates. [Paras 88-90, 92, 114]Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16 - Army Act, 1950 - s.12 - Whether Present Recruitment … by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

2 provides that the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, … considered, and they have been answered in paragraphs 77, 79, 80,81, 82, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 100 and 101, which are being extracted below:77. … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

question raised with regard to exercise of the power of the Central Government under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950 with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954, the Apex Court in : [2001]2SCR1127 Union of India and … statutory provision.10. It was lastly urged that so far as several comparable statutory provisions which inter alia, include, Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Section 197 of the

In the Matter Of: Ex. Rfn. Mohinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Other ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

reproduce the provisions of Rule 51 also, which reads as under: - “51. A person, subject to the Army Act, 1950, will forfeit his pay and allowances (including expatriation allowance) for every day (as defined in Section 92 of

Major General R.S. Balyan Vs. the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Gove ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Regulations

Reported in : 2006(10)SCALE589; (2007)1SCC513; 2007(3)SLJ257(SC)

irregularity had come to its knowledge through representation having been made by affected Army Officers -Appeal dismissed - ARMY ACT, 1950.[C.A. No. 46/1950]. Section 192 & Army Regulations, 1962, Para 68: [Arijit Pasayat & Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ] … 5 is to be determined in terms of Para 2 of the Govt. of India O.M. No. 21(4)/ 92/D(inspection) dated 04.05.1993 as amended vide O.M. No. 21(4)/92/D(inspection) dated 22.12.1993 and not on the basis of the interpretation

Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 164

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)116; 1997(42)DRJ182

fact was aggrieved by the aforesaid punishment. The petitioner filed a statutory complaint under Section 164 of the Army Act, 1950. The said complaint was considered by the order dated 17.8.94. The order passed in the statutory complaint reads … passed in the statutory complaint reads as under:- 'The Central Government after considering the petition dated 31 Aug 92 submitted by Shri B.P. Ojha, Advocate on behalf of No.6378767H ex Hav/Cl Ramesh Kumar of Reserve Supply Depot,

Union of India and Others Vs. Major General Madan Lal Yadav (Retd.)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 3, 101 and 123; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 190 and 209; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190 to 210, 225 to 235 and 238 to 250; Constitution of India - Article 32 and 33; Army Act (Amendment) Act, 1992; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34, 35, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 and 67; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 83, 86(4), 90 and 92; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 149; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1996SC1340; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)270; 1996(3)SCALE72; (1996)4SCC127; [1996]3SCR785

August 29, 1986.2. On August 30, 1986, action was initiated against the respondent under Section 123 of the Army Act, 1950 (for short, the 'Act'). He was kept under open arrest from that date onwards and retired from service … of Section 81, Section 83 or Section 117. That not being a power expressly conferred on it under Section 92 can only be sought under Section 90(2), and resort to that section can be had only if trial