Advanced Search Results

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

settled.90. In AIR1999SC3833: (1999) 8 SCC375UOI vs. Sadha Singh, the respondent was convicted under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 for the offence of murder. The court observed that the Army Act was a special Act which provided … nature of the evil it seeks to avert. (Ref: Reed Dickerson in “The Interpretation and Application of Statutes”) 86. Mr. Madhukar drew my attention to the pronouncement of the Apex Court reported at (1981) 1 SCC315Life Insurance

Mahipal Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 116 and 120; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 465

Reported in : 55(1994)DLT176

that the first charge sheet was issued to the petitioner under the provisions of Section 69 of the Army Act,1950, (hereinafter called 'the Act'), which was subsequently amended to Section 63 in the second, third and fourth charge … Motive For Procuring Sanction For Enrollment of A PERSON in that he,at Jabalpur on or around 13 Jan 86, while working as a clerk in the Zonal Recruiting Office accepted a sum of Rs.500.00 (Rupees five hundred

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

question raised with regard to exercise of the power of the Central Government under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950 with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954, the Apex Court in : [2001]2SCR1127 Union of India and … conferred by legislative exercise on various authorities.In this behalf, an examination of the provisions of Section 92 and 86 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section195 and 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which envisage

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … the same grounds and respondents had taken the same stand.89. We shall now note the facts in LPA 86/94 filed by Ex. Capt. J.S. Yadav.90. The appellant was commissioned in the Indian Army on 12.1.1969 and had

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that “a militant or terrorist or insurgent, is an ‘Enemy’ within the aforesaid definition [Section 3(x) of the Army Act, 1950]. and it is the bounden duty of all Army Personnel to act against a militant or a terrorist … arisen where the Government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with provisions of the Constitution.” 86. There is therefore a clear distinction between an armed rebellion that threatens the security of the country or

R.K. Anand Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1958 - Sections 191; Army Rules, 1950 - Rule 16A; Army (Amendment) Rules, 1979; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 191

Reported in : 1991(21)DRJ185

get the benefit of retirement age of 58 and retire on 31 December, 1992.(2) Section 191 of the Army Act, 1950 (for brevity 'the Act') empowers the Central Government, among other things, to make rules for the removal, retirement, … 'WILLINGNESSCERTIFICATE It is certified that the position explained in Army Hq letter No. 04476 MS9B dated 9 Sep. 86 has been clearly understood by me and it if confirmed that the same is acceptable to me. Signature

Col. M.C. Gautam Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 86 and 192 - Order 10 - Order 83; Army Regulation - Regn. 1025; Constitution of India - Article 226; Ministry of defense Regulation, 1025

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi49

study leave, there are three paras of Special Army Order 10/ S/ 86 which are relevant, they are paras 47, 48 and 83. The said … involved in all these writ petitions is whether the officers who have been allotted married accommodation by the Army Headquarters can be asked to shift to another accommodation when they proceed on study leave.2. In order to … be regarded as administrative instructions which are applied by the Army HQs. thereforee, as far as possible, the action of the Army HQs. has to be in accordance with these administrative instructions. The decision of the Committee … married accommodation as long as there were on the study leave - Section 13: [Altamas Kabir & Cyriac Joseph,JJ] Custody of child - Welfare of

Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(“subordinate officer”) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949; Section 47 (“his subordinate in rank”) of the Army Act, 1950; Section 17 (“by an officer subordinate to that Government” and “by an officer subordinate to the State Government”) and … to him”) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013; Section 86 (“any officer subordinate to the Board”) of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014; Section 5 (“any other officer

Union of India and Others Vs. Major General Madan Lal Yadav (Retd.)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 3, 101 and 123; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 190 and 209; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190 to 210, 225 to 235 and 238 to 250; Constitution of India - Article 32 and 33; Army Act (Amendment) Act, 1992; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34, 35, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 and 67; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 83, 86(4), 90 and 92; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 149; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1996SC1340; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)270; 1996(3)SCALE72; (1996)4SCC127; [1996]3SCR785

August 29, 1986.2. On August 30, 1986, action was initiated against the respondent under Section 123 of the Army Act, 1950 (for short, the 'Act'). He was kept under open arrest from that date onwards and retired from service … connotes the entire proceedings before the Tribunal from the time that the petition is transferred to it under Section 86 of the Act until the pronouncement of the award. While the word 'trial' standing by itself is susceptible

Pravat Saha @ Pravat Kumar Saha Vs. Union of India Service Through the ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

imprisonment (RI) by his Commanding Officer under a proper ‘offence report charged under Section 39 (a) of the Army Act, 1950. Therefore, it was, according to him, illegal to punish him again by discharging him from service for the … each of the two occasions. The ‘discharge was governed under an Army HQ policy letter dated 28 Feb 86 for missing training more than 30 consecutive days (Annexure R-4) 5. Having considered the submissions made by both