Advanced Search Results

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

settled.90. In AIR1999SC3833: (1999) 8 SCC375UOI vs. Sadha Singh, the respondent was convicted under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 for the offence of murder. The court observed that the Army Act was a special Act which provided … a statutory provision as against a provision in another enactment, in AIR1998SC866: (1998) 2 Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 82 SCC663Indian Bank vs. Usha & Anr., it was observed that there must be two contradictory provisions on the

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … but he was never produced. The trial was adjourned sine die which was in violation of Army Rule 82(3) and Army Act 117(3). The order adjourning the Court sine die was passed by the General Officer Commanding,

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … and healthcare. These pillars formed a multi-faceted approach, showcasing a holistic strategy for the global empowerment of women.” 82. Consequently, the constitutional mandate and the national as well as international policy of the Government of India is

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

powers of MG ASC, HQ Southern Command. 10. We notice the relevant provisions of the Acts and Regulations:-The Army Act 1950 '71. Punishments awardable by courts-martial.- Punishments may be inflicted in respect of offences committed by persons subject to … he was tried by General Court Martial on certain charges and was dismissed from service on 13.6.1988 under Section 71 of the Army At. He submitted papers for payment of pension stating that he had qualifying service. … Pension Regulation are not ultra vires of the provisions of Section 81 82 47 and 27 of the Navy Act and that where the Court

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Major A. HussaIn (ic-14827)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 63 and 191; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22(1), 23, 24, 25, 47, 81, 82, 95, 96, 105, 149, 177, 180 and 184

Reported in : AIR1998SC577; JT1997(9)SC676; 1996LabIC581; (1996)ILLJ781SC; 1995(6)SCALE214; (1998)1SCC537; 1998(1)LC165(SC); (1998)1UPLBEC330

him including the confirmation of sentence passed upon him by the court-martial.2. A General Court-Martial (GCM) under the Army Act, 1950 (for short 'the Act') was convened to try the respondent holding the rank of Major in the Army … that where many cases are fixed and adjournments granted. Under Army Rule 82, when a court is once assembled and the accused has been arraigned, … rank of Major in the Army on the following charge:'Charge-Sheet'The accused IC-14827F Major Arshad Hussain, 225 Ground Liaison Section Type 'C' attached to AOC center, an Officer holding a permanent commission in the Regular Army, is charged

Lt Col Hardeep Sandhu Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

R. Jayaprasad Vs Union of India and Ors., wherein the Hon‟ble High Court of Delhi observed as under:- “Army Act, 1950- Section 27- Defence Services- Premature Retirement- Refusal on ground of foreign service liability- Fallacious, unsustainable and quashed- Assignment given

income Tax Officer Vs. Ashok Suri.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)58TTJ(Del)162

1981-82 Income Tax Act 1961 s.68 - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual

Dhanesh Gupta and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationCivil

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(2A) and 142(2D)

Reported in : (2004)192CTR(Del)612; [2005]272ITR482(Delhi)

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual

Lt. Col. B.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 26, 27 and 33

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT181

in the case of the petitioner. The learned Counsel referred to Sections 26, 27 and 33 of the Army Act, 1950. 11. Section 26 provides for remedy of aggrieved persons other than .officers. The provisions give right to such … attention of the officers is invited to : (a) Government of India, Ministry of defense letter No. 15(3)/ 82/1711-A/D(AG) dated 31Dec., 83 as amended and letters No. F.14(3)/88/D(AG) dated 30 Dec. 91 and 10 Jan., 92 regarding

R. Viswan and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(4), 21 and 63; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 19 to 21

Reported in : AIR1983SC658; 1983(2)Crimes392(SC); (1983)IILLJ157SC; 1983(1)SCALE497; (1983)3SCC401; [1983]3SCR60

relating to the interpretation of Article 33 of the Constitution. The question is whether Section 21 of the Army Act 1950 read with Chapter IV of the Army Rules 1954 is within the scope and ambit of Article 33