Advanced Search Results

Pratap Singh Vs. Chief of Army Staff and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act 1950 - Section 8; Army Rules - Rule 13(3)

note that vide SRO No.161 dated 11.6.1979, in exercise of the power conferred by Section 8 of the Army Act 1950 the Central Government prescribed the officers listed in the SRO with the powers under the Army Act with

Colonel Aniltej Singh Dhaliwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 2 ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(2), 71, 153 and 163; Army Rules; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A

Reported in : 2002(64)DRJ854

appropriate orders on the question of sentence in exercise of the powers vested under Section 163 of the Army Act, 1950, after modifying the Court's previous order dated 10.5.1999. This application was vehemently opposed by the Petitioner herein in … deemed to be in service but as a result of setting aside of the conviction of cashiering and 8 months RI, there is no legal conviction against the Petitioner and he is still very much subject to

Shakuntala Devi Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the death was attributable to military service as he has a statutory power under Section 8 of the Army Act, 1950, despite that the request was rejected. The case of petitioner is that petitioners son who died on casual

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

2 provides that the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, … qualifications for appointment of Chairperson and other members. Section 7 deals with appointment of Chairperson and other members. Section 8 deals with term of the office. Section 9 deals with resignation and removal; Section 10 deals with salaries,

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal Vs. Usha ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 350 and 549(1); Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 8(3-A) and 11-A; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 122

Reported in : AIR1986SC1655; 1986CriLJ1248; 1986(3)Crimes11(SC); 1986(1)SCALE931; 1986Supp(1)SCC190; [1986]3SCR113

offenders who are charged with having committed offences which fall under the purview of Section 52 of the Army Act, 1950, Section 549(1) of Cr.P.C. provides that Central Government may make Rules consistent with Cr.P.C. and the Army Act. In … on account of this decision that the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 1952 was amended by incorporating Sections 8(3A) and 11, reading as under:Section 8(3A) : In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the provisions

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241 : 2025 INSC 954Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. v. The Union of India & Ors. (Writ Petition

Sukhdev Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965 - Rule 2; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4(1), 63, 73, 81(4), 113, 114 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 33 and 352

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR951]; 2000(7)SCALE259; (2000)8SCC492; [2000]Supp4SCR292; (2001)1UPLBEC664

Court considered the nature of the service in the G.R.E.F. and the applicability of certain provisions of the Army Act, 1950 for the purpose of taking disciplinary action against the Officers of the G.R.E.F. In that judgment this Court … the G.R.E.F. on 8-11-1966 and was discharged sometime before 24-11-1972. He joined the Punjab Agriculture University as a Section Officer and on 7-9-1973, in the Municipal Committee, Ludhiana. In the year 1976 the services of the employees

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that “a militant or terrorist or insurgent, is an ‘Enemy’ within the aforesaid definition [Section 3(x) of the Army Act, 1950]. and it is the bounden duty of all Army Personnel to act against a militant or a terrorist … the Human Rights Commission. In a Study on the right to the truth, it was stated in paragraph 8 that though the right had its origins in enforced disappearances, it has gradually extended to include extra-judicial executions.

D.N.Bhargava Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under sub-sections91) and (4) of Section 4 to issue SRO No.329 applying some of the provisions of the Army Act, 1950 to GREF and directing by what of the provisions of the Army Act, 1950 to GREF and directing … is no more res integra having been settled by the Supreme Court in the case reported as (2000) 8 SCC492Sukhdev Singh Gill v. State of Punjab & Ors. which reads as under:“14. In fact, there is a

M.Z.H. Khan Vs. Chief of Army Staff, New Delhi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3(4), 26, 27, 56, 56(A), 63, 71, 116, 122, 130, 164(2), 169, 169(1), 169(3) and 169(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 33, 33(7), 34, 34(1), 34(2), 36, 106 to 133, 184 and 203; Constitution of India - Article 22(I)

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2794; (2001)3UPLBEC2202

three months in civil jail,(b) to be dismissed from service.4. Petitioner filed statutory petition under Section 164(2) of Army Act, 1950, which was kept pending and not decided hence the petitioner filed a Writ Petition No. 37038 of 1998. … Article 22(1) of Constitution of India and the law as laid down by this Court in 1993 AWC 883.(iv) Petitioner was not given a copy of court of inquiry which is clear violation of Rule 180 of