Advanced Search Results
Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-07-1999
ContractConstitution
Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B
2000(1)ALD689
Navy or Air Force when commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure … and to correct any other error or collect any amount that may have been omitted to be charged. Section 79 of the Act contemplates that the railway administration may, on the request made by the consignee or endorsee,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … Weir. Capt. A.K. Rana has now following to state.I was posted to 7 Jat Battalion since 23 March, 79 Presently I am Delhi. I was posted to 527 Int. and F.S. Coy From my B.7 Jat and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOus Kutilingal Achudan Nair and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-20-1975
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 33; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 3, 9 and 21; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 19(11) and 79; Defence of India Act - Sections 4; Industrial Disputes Act
AIR1976SC1179; 1976LabIC780; (1976)2SCC780; [1976]2SCR769; 1976(8)LC43(SC)
Army Act, 1950, has also been made applicable to them. By another notification dated 23.2.1972, issued under Rule 79, of the Army Rules, civilian employees of the training establishments and Military Hospitals have been taken out of … not fall under any of the categories enumerated in Sub-clauses (a) to (i) of Section 2 of the Army Act, 1950, and that the impugned notifications are ultra vires the Army Act and are struck by Articles 19(1)(c) and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam
Supreme Court of India
Oct-03-2008
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(14), 2B, 25B and 25F; Factories Act - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957
2009(1)AWC334(SC); 2008(5)CTC365; [2008(119)FLR398]; [2009(1)JCR86(SC)]; 2008(4)KLT444(SC); (2009)ILLJ602SC; (2009)1MLJ176(SC); (2009)153PLR348; RLW2009(1)SC626; 2008(13)SC
any such person -(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the … this connection referred us Shankar Balaji Waje v. State of Maharashtra : (1962)ILLJ119SC in which the scope of Section 79 of the Factories Act was under consideration to plead that as this provision was analogous to Section 25B
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty
Supreme Court of India
Feb-25-2022
Land Acquisition
(“subordinate officer”) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949; Section 47 (“his subordinate in rank”) of the Army Act, 1950; Section 17 (“by an officer subordinate to that Government” and “by an officer subordinate to the State Government”) and … and Section 13 (“authority subordinate to the Central Government”) of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963; Section 79 (“any officer subordinate to the Board”) of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966; Section 42 (“any person subordinate to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.
Delhi
Aug-12-2014
MRTP
settled.90. In AIR1999SC3833: (1999) 8 SCC375UOI vs. Sadha Singh, the respondent was convicted under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 for the offence of murder. The court observed that the Army Act was a special Act which provided … that the general one is later in time.(Ref : Sanwarmal Karjiwal v. Vishwa Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., AIR1990SC1563‖ 79. In the case in hand the IT Act is prior and the JJ Act is a later enactment.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMiss. Romini Susan Kurian Vs. State of A.P. and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-12-1992
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitation Fees) Act, 1983 - Sections 3 and 15; Andhra Pradesh Professional Institutions (Regulation of Admission into Under-graduate Professional Courses through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 1989 - Rule 9(4); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 192; Army Order - Orders 59 and 79
AIR1992AP380
of A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitation Fees) Act, 1983 and Section 192 of Army Act, 1950 - petitioner appeared for common entrance test for admission to Medical College - father of petitioner Army man
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India (UOi)
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-1997
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 245, 246, 248, 254, 257A, 352, 355 and 356; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 1(2), 130, 131, 144 and 197; Arms Act, 1959; Army Act, 1950; Assam Disturbed Areas Act; Armed Forces (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Armed Forces (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6;
AIR1998SC465; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)220; JT1997(9)SC431; 1997(7)SCALE741; (1998)2SCC109; [1997]Supp5SCR469; AIR 1998 SC 431
substance in the complaint, suitable action has been taken against the person concerned under the provisions of the Army Act. The learned Attorney General has placed before us instructions in the form of a list of 'Do's and … as contravention of these instructions is punishable under Sections 41, 42(e), 63 and 64(f) of the Army Act, 1950.61. In State of Uttar Pradesh v. Chandra Mohan Nigam and Ors. : (1978)ILLJ6SC , this Court, while considering … to plead a statutory defence in criminal proceedings under Sections 76 and 79 of the Indian Penal Code. The protection given under Section 6 cannot, … Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura. The expression 'disturbed area' has been defined in Section 2(b) to mean an area which is for the time being declared
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Paramjit Singh Kohli Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-31-1997
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 63, 71, 79 and 84; ;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 23, 26 and 26(2)
(1997)1CALLT395(HC)
the types of sentences and the procedure in awarding such sentences upon persons subject to the Army Act, Section 79 however, even though forming a part of chapter VII of the Act appears to be an exception to … Wellington which ultimately culminated into the issuance of a charge-sheet against the petitioner under Section 63 of the Army Act for committing an act prejudicial to good order and military discipline. It shall be advantageous to reproduce the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTourism Corporation of Gujarat Ltd. Vs. Kalu Valji Jethwa
Gujarat
Nov-23-2007
Labour and Industrial
Companies Act, 1956; Working Journalists and other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1955; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(9), 2(14), 17B, 25C, 25F and 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1), 51, 51(1), 51(2), 52, 53 and 55; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Employees State Insurance Act, 1949; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Apprentices Act, 1961; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Constitution of India - Article 311
[2008(117)FLR408]; (2008)1GLR12; (2008)ILLJ985Guj; 2009(2)SLJ37(NULL); 2008(2)AIRKarR227(FB)(Guj)
any such person -[i] who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or[ii] who is employed in the police … employer contended that the concerned employees were not workmen under Section 2(1) of the Factories Act and, therefore, Section 79 of the Act providing for leave did not apply to them. 18.1 The Apex Court held that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »