Advanced Search Results
N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … From my B.7 Jat and reported to the Unit on 10 December, 75 and stayed until 23 March, 78. On 12 Jan. 75 I had taken over from Capt. R.S. Rathaur as Int. Officer in charge of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSyed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-07-1999
ContractConstitution
Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B
2000(1)ALD689
Navy or Air Force when commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure … recover the cost of such unloading and any charge for the detention of any wagon on this account.11. Section 78 of the Act empowers the Railway administration to measure and weight. It contemplates that notwithstanding anything contained in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.P. Prasad Vs. Lt. Commander and ors.
Kolkata
Nov-10-1998
Criminal
Indian Navy Act, 1957 - Section 78; ;Army Act, 1950; ;Air Force Act, 1950; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 200 to 204, 323, 342, 397, 401, 448, 475 and 482; ;Constitution of India - Article 227
1999CriLJ243
to be tried by Court-martial :-(1) The Central Government may make rules, consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957, and the Air Force Act, 1950, and any other law, relating to the Armed … getting transfer of the case in terms of Section 475 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 78 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class (II) at Port Blair,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kerala
Sep-02-1992
Criminal
Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549
1993CriLJ3070
be tried by Court-martial :- (1) The Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and, the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of … Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and the Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGurman Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Nov-09-1983
Criminal
1984CriLJ718
assembly of the court of enquiry is in the nature of review which is not authorised by the Army Act, 1950 or the rules framed thereunder and as such the convening of the Court of Inquiry for the second … compensation of the loss was preferred by the Supply Depot ASC Panagarh in accordance with the provisions of Section 78B of the Indian Railways (Amendment) Act of 1961 which was registered by the railways and the same … the Supply Depot ASC Panagarh in accordance with the provisions of Section 78B of the Indian Railways (Amendment) Act of 1961 which was registered by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and Another Vs. Major K.K. Taneja
Delhi
Nov-14-1990
LimitationService
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 41, Rule 27; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69, 153, 154, 160(1) and 164
ILR1991Delhi215
Major. While working in that capacity, he was charged for an offence under Sec corporation 69 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the allegation that on 7th May, 1976, at about 23.00 hrs., … authority under the Army Act. 2. Along with this appeal, the appellants filed an application (CM 158/88) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condition of delay of 19 days in filing the appeal. The appellants … features of the respondents case as disclosed in his petition (CWP 1253/ 78). The respondent herein was appointed as a regular commissioned officer in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaroj Taneja Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Oct-22-1998
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14
1998VIAD(Delhi)829; 77(1999)DLT233
of this Court was upheld by the Supreme Court. Later on, a notice under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950 read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 was issued. On the 30th of October, 1991 this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.
Delhi
Aug-12-2014
MRTP
settled.90. In AIR1999SC3833: (1999) 8 SCC375UOI vs. Sadha Singh, the respondent was convicted under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 for the offence of murder. The court observed that the Army Act was a special Act which provided … overlap, if any, between the two enactments vis-a-vis each other to be resolved. Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 64 78. This issue can be examined on the fundamental and accepted tests of legislative interpretation which also have been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India (UOi)
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-1997
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 245, 246, 248, 254, 257A, 352, 355 and 356; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 1(2), 130, 131, 144 and 197; Arms Act, 1959; Army Act, 1950; Assam Disturbed Areas Act; Armed Forces (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Armed Forces (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6;
AIR1998SC465; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)220; JT1997(9)SC431; 1997(7)SCALE741; (1998)2SCC109; [1997]Supp5SCR469; AIR 1998 SC 431
substance in the complaint, suitable action has been taken against the person concerned under the provisions of the Army Act. The learned Attorney General has placed before us instructions in the form of a list of 'Do's and … as contravention of these instructions is punishable under Sections 41, 42(e), 63 and 64(f) of the Army Act, 1950.61. In State of Uttar Pradesh v. Chandra Mohan Nigam and Ors. : (1978)ILLJ6SC , this Court, while considering … Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura. The expression 'disturbed area' has been defined in Section 2(b) to mean an area which is for the time being declared
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-11-2025
Education
[2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241
by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … will be att being at par with male offrs, for a period of 52 weeks for SSCOs & 78 weeks for Reg Offrs with Engrs/Sigs/AAD unit in fd. (e) Approved Att Period. Approved att period for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »