Advanced Search Results

Union of India and ors. Vs. Harjeet Singh Sandhu Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 34 to 68, 45, 69, 70, 71, 74, 101, 109, 117, 121, 122, 123, 125, 127, 153, 158, 160, 164, 165 and 191; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14 and 71; Constitution of India - Artilce 33, 310 and 311

Reported in : AIR2001SC1772; JT2001(4)SC597; 2001LabIC1707; 2001(3)SCALE336; (2001)5SCC593; [2001]2SCR1127; 2001(2)SCT1018(SC); 2002(1)SLJ1(SC); (2001)2UPLBEC1397

result whereof Bhagwan Das died. A General Court martial (GCM, for short) was convened under Section 109 of Army Act, 1950 which tried the respondent and the other officers. On 26.12.1978 the GCM awarded the sentence of forfeiture of … in Chapter IV of the Act entitled 'Conditions of Service'. Chapter VI deals with offences. Sections 34 to 68, finding place in Chapter VI are very widely worded and embrace within their realm practically every type of

Union of India and ors. Vs. R.K. Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 34 to 68, 71 and 72; Army Orders - Orders 70 and 84; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22, 23, 24 and 149; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32, 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2001SC3053; [2001(91)FLR1006]; JT2001(9)SC76; 2001LabIC4007; 2001(7)SCALE70; (2001)9SCC592; 2001(4)SCT828(SC); 2002(1)SLJ323(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC111

coming to the conclusion that the punishment of dismissal was violative of provisions of Section 72 of the Army Act, 1950. Section 72 merely provides that the Court Martial may, on convicting a person, award either the punishment which is … on convicting a person subject to this Act of any of the offences specified in Secs. 34 to 68 inclusive, award either the particular punishment with which the offence is state in the said sections to be

Brig. R.P. Singh Vsm Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32 and 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52, 57, 60, 63, 71, 153, 154, 156, 158, 160, 164, 164(1), 164(2), 166, 191, 191(2), 192, 193 and 193A; defense Service Regulation - Regulation 472; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 2, 22, 59, 68, 68(1), 68(2), 68(3), 68(4), 70, 147 and 160

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT792; 2004(77)DRJ480

to pass an order directing revision of sentence of the General Court Martial under Section 160 of the Army Act, 1950 read with Rule 68 of the Army Rules, 1954.(ii)The statutory authority is bound to take into consideration, a

Ranjit Singh Chaurasia Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 38 to 68, 71, 72 and 73

Reported in : AIR1976All405

and dismissed the writ petition. Against the judgment of the learned Single Judge, this appeal has been filed.2. Sections 34 to 68 of the Army Act, 1950, set out the offences punishable under this Act and the … imprisonment as well as dismissal from service The appellant availed of the remedies available to him under the Army Act, 1950, but failed to get any redress. He thereupon filed a writ petition in this Court. The only point

Dr. Subhendu Sen (Vsm) Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 39, 52, 71, 74, 153, 154, 155(2), 157, 158, 160(1), 164(1) and (2) - Rules 68(3) and 105; Constitution of India - Articles 33 and 226

Reported in : 1998(1)ALD773

evidence while reconsidering the finding and the sentence.14. It is further contended by the respondents that Army Rule 68 lays down that when a proceeding is sent back for revision, the Court will adhere to the revision … first three charges were framed under Section 52(b) and the 4th charge was under Section 39(a) of the Army Act, 1950.4. The General Court-Martialproceedings commenced on 22-11-1993 and concluded on 11-3-1994. During the proceedings 32 persons were examined as

Union of India and Others Vs. J.S. Brar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69, 154, 160 and 164(2); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 68 and 70

Reported in : AIR1993SC773; JT1992(6)SC266; 1992(2)SCALE749; (1993)1SCC176; [1992]Supp1SCR916; 1993(2)SLJ77(SC); 1992(2)LC789(SC)

behalf to rebut their evidence.2. The accused was charged with the offence punishable under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Two charges were … incident of 27.9.1983, the accused was acquitted. The Confirming Authority, however, ordered, under Section 160 read with Rule 68, revision of the findings of the GCM for recording fresh evidence and reconsideration.3. Subsequent to the order of

Major E.G. Barsay Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1958)60BOMLR159

charge.14. The second point as regards the legality of the trial is raised under the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, by Mr. Purshottam on behalf of accused No. 1. That again is a point which has been raised … a list of offences and, according to Mr. Purshottam, Sections 34 to 68 deal with offences 'which are triable by a court-martial alone, while Section … is concerned, it refers to three kinds of illegal acts, the first two of which would fall under Section 5(1)(c) and Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under Section 5(1)(c) of the said Act, a

Virendra Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71, 154, 160, 162 and 164(2); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 34(1), 35(1), 57, 58(2), 58(3), 59, 59-A, 62, 68, 137 and 149; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 33, 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Evidence Act; Army Regulation, 1987

Reported in : 2002(1)WLN252

orders thereto and the order dated 4.7.1991 (Annex. 10-A) by which his petition under Section 164(2) of the Army Act, 1950 (for short, 'the Act') has been rejected by the Central Government. (2). The facts and circumstances giving rise … Authority heldthat as while passing the order of punishment, the court-martial had to consider the provisions of Para 68 of the Regulations for Army, 1987 (for short, 'the Regulations') for guidance and keep in mind the nature

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct

Union of India and anr. Vs. Charanjit S. Gill and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 34 to 68, 69, 71, 108, 109, 110, 112, 118, 130, 153, 154, 158, 160, 162, 164, 191 and 192; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 37, 39, 40, 44, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 60, 61, 62, 66(1), 69, 70, 71, 89, 102, 103, 105, 113 and 129; Army Rules, 1959; Indian Army Act, 1911; U.K. Act; Court Martial (Appeals) Act, 1951; Court Martial (appeals) Act, 1968; Uniform Code of Military Justice Act, 1950; Administration of justice Act, 1968; Military Justice Act, 1968; Constitution of India - Article 71(2), 233 and 235; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 107(2)

Reported in : AIR2000SC3425; JT2000(5)SC135; 2000(4)SCALE221; (2000)5SCC742; 2000(2)LC1317(SC); (2000)2UPLBEC1642

keeping in view the report of the Select Committee appointed for the purpose. Prior to the enactment of Army Act, 1950, there existed the Indian Army Act, 1911 made and applied by the British Rulers. Feeling that some of … No. 1 was alleged to has absented himself without leave on four occasions which was an offence under Section 39(1) of the Army Act. He was also charged under Section 63 of the Army Act for violation … Chapter VI of the Act deals with the offences. Sections 34 to 68 relate to the offences of the first description noted hereinabove and Section