Advanced Search Results

Union of India and anr. Vs. Charanjit S. Gill and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 34 to 68, 69, 71, 108, 109, 110, 112, 118, 130, 153, 154, 158, 160, 162, 164, 191 and 192; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 37, 39, 40, 44, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 60, 61, 62, 66(1), 69, 70, 71, 89, 102, 103, 105, 113 and 129; Army Rules, 1959; Indian Army Act, 1911; U.K. Act; Court Martial (Appeals) Act, 1951; Court Martial (appeals) Act, 1968; Uniform Code of Military Justice Act, 1950; Administration of justice Act, 1968; Military Justice Act, 1968; Constitution of India - Article 71(2), 233 and 235; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 107(2)

Reported in : AIR2000SC3425; JT2000(5)SC135; 2000(4)SCALE221; (2000)5SCC742; 2000(2)LC1317(SC); (2000)2UPLBEC1642

keeping in view the report of the Select Committee appointed for the purpose. Prior to the enactment of Army Act, 1950, there existed the Indian Army Act, 1911 made and applied by the British Rulers. Feeling that some of … No. 1 was alleged to has absented himself without leave on four occasions which was an offence under Section 39(1) of the Army Act. He was also charged under Section 63 of the Army Act for violation … that the sentence should be announced forthwith in open court. Moreover Rule 66(1) requires reasons to be recorded for its recommendation in cases where the

Lt. Col. Amal Sankar Bhaduri Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 33, 226, 227 and 227(4); ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 109 and 113; ;Army Rules - Rules 37 and 40(2)

Reported in : (1987)0CALLT1(HC),91CWN631

37 of the Army Rules of 1954 framed under the Act of 1950. Rule 37 reads as follows :-'37. Convening of General and District Court-Martial.--(1) … not the petitioner under Section 63 of the Army Act. Aiding and abetting itself is an offence under Section 66 of the Army Act. As such the charge in any event, is wholly misconceived and in the view … a class of citizen not entitled to the benefits of liberal spirit of the Constitution. Persons subject to Army Act are citizens of this ancient land havings feeling of belonging to the civilized community governed by the liberty

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that “a militant or terrorist or insurgent, is an ‘Enemy’ within the aforesaid definition [Section 3(x) of the Army Act, 1950]. and it is the bounden duty of all Army Personnel to act against a militant or a terrorist

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Dinesh Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 14, 17, 46, 64, 70, 70(1), 70(2), 70(3), 70(4), 70(5), 74, 117, 117(2) and 141; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 165; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 99, 99(1) and 133 to 161; Army Rules - Rule 66(1)

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE396

the Chief of the Army Staff confirming the proceedings of the court martial under Section 164 of the Army Act, 1950 was illegal since no reason had been given in support of the order by the Chief of the … finding of 'guilty' or of 'not guilty'. It was held that it was only in case of Rule 66(1) of the Army Rules, where there was a recommendation for mercy, the reasons were required to be given.

Mahila Utkarsh Trust Through Its President and Others Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Education

pretext for sex-based discrimination, and, when women are recruited in the Police, Army, Air Force and various avocations and professions, there is no justification for … thus: 2.1 The petitioner is a Public Charitable Trust registered under the provisions of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 and is engaged in the activity of upliftment of women and is active in the creation of employment … up and heard together as a common question of law is involved in all these matters, viz. whether Section 66(1) (b) of the Factories Act, 1948 [the Act hereafter] and it s proviso are ultra vires the Constitution

R. Chatterjee Vs. Sub Area Commander H.Q. Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Army Act, 1911 - Sections 2 and 2(2); Constitution of India - Articles 33, 35 and 372

Reported in : AIR1951Mad777; (1951)1MLJ258

Act of 1911. In parenthesis it may be stated that Act No. XLVI [46] of 1950 designated the Army Act, 1950 which came into force on 22-6-1950, though it has no direct appln. to the present case, can also … & not the terms of contract as alleged by the petnr. is evident from a perusal of various sections of the Army Act. It has also to be noted that the so-called contract as contained in annexure … to officers : See Lea-man v. The King, (1920) 3 K. B. 663 :89 L. J. K. B. 1073. An interesting discussion on this subject

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … convoy from Leh to Pathankot in 2010, overseeing Junior Commissioned Officers and Jawans, managing logistics, arms, and ammunition. 66. Women officers like Colonel Anshu Jamwal have also been actively involved in UN Peacekeeping missions since 2004, serving

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … This case also is not relevant for the present discussion.145. In Leaman v. The King, (1920) 3 KB 663, the petitioner before the King's Bench Division was working in British Army. He claimed pay for Military service

Som Datt Datta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 50(2), 121(4), 125, 126, 139(6), 164 and 165; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 174 and 549; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 3 and 5; Constitution of India - Article 32; Defence Services Regulation - Regulation 527

Reported in : AIR1969SC414; 1969CriLJ663; [1969]2SCR177

it is necessary to scrutinize the provisions of the Army Act in some detail. Section 2 of the Army Act, 1950 (Act 46 of 1950), hereinafter called the 'Army Act', describes the different categories of army personnel who are … incongruity was remedied by the Tribunals and Inquiries Act, 1958 (s. 12), [6 & 7 Elizabeth 2 c. 66], which provides that on request a subordinate authority must supply to a party genuinely interested the reasons for

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

settled.90. In AIR1999SC3833: (1999) 8 SCC375UOI vs. Sadha Singh, the respondent was convicted under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 for the offence of murder. The court observed that the Army Act was a special Act which provided … in which conflict, if any, between the two statutes is to be resolved. Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 54 66. The complaint has been registered by the police under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code as well