Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)

who behaves in a manner unbecoming his position can be removed from service under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950, read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 without being tried by a Court Martial under Section … criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was also charged under Section 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having committed an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of

i.T.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1985(Supp)SCC476; [1985]Supp1SCR145

in the case of State of Maharashtra and Ors. v. The Salvation Army, Western India Territory : [1975]3SCR475 this Court had to consider the question … Western India Territory : [1975]3SCR475 this Court had to consider the question of fee under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The Court noted that fee was defined as a charge for a special service rendered to individuals by … a live issue if the Market Committees were to amend the bye-laws made under Section 148 read with Section 65(2) of the Act in future without giving an opportunity to the affected interests of being heard in regard

Directorate of Enforcement vs.abdullah Ali Balsharaf & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

3 SCC340 dealing with applicability of section 428 of the CrPC to a General Court Martial under the Army Act 1950 (Army Act), the Supreme Court has held that since section 167 of the Army Act specifically says that … 102 CrPC.” 11. Accordingly, the question that arises for our consideration is the following: In the light of section 65 of the PMLA, which makes the provisions of Cr.P.C. applicable inter alia to seizure and attachment of property

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

Navy or Air Force when commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure … Act, the petitioners have executed forwarding note from Nuzvid to New Delhi.9. The learned Counsel also took to Section 65 of the Act, which contemplates issuance of receipt. It envisages that the railway administration shall, in a case

Ghisilal Vs. State Industrial Court and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 31 and 61; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 16, 18 and 65; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2005(106)FLR801]; (2005)IIILLJ458MP; 2005(3)MPLJ135

apprentice other than an apprentice under Sub-clause (v); but does not include any person-(i) who subject to the Army Act, 1950 (XLVI of 1950), or the Air Force Act, 1950 (XLV of 1950), or Navy Discipline Act, 1957 (62 … The order of the Labour Court was assailed by the respondent No. 3 by preferring an appeal under Section 65 of the Act. The Industrial Court by the impugned order dated November 15, 1994 (Annexure-P-14) has allowed the

Major G.S. Sodhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 109, 154 to 156, 164(1), 191, 192 and 193; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22 to 25, 28 to 32, 62, 65, 77(1), 95 to 101 and 191 to 193; Evidence Act, 1872; Army Regulations, 1987

Reported in : AIR1991SC1617; 1991CriLJ1947; [1992(65)FLR484]; JT1991(5)SC55; (1991)2SCC382

Matched in: Citation AIR1991SC1617; 1991CriLJ1947; [1992(65)FLR484]; JT1991(5)SC55; (1991)2SCC382

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Flt. Lt. G.S. Bajwa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 7, 41, 41(2), 65, 111 and 125; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 21, 22 and 33; Army Act; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 88, 89, 100, 102, 110, 111 and 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 104(2003)DLT618(SC); JT2003(4)SC505; 2003(4)SCALE494; (2003)9SCC630; [2003]3SCR1092; 2003(3)SLJ288(SC); 2003(2)LC849(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1479

Naval, Military and Air Forces; any other Armed Forces of the Union, would enable Parliament to enact the Army Act and armed with this power the Act was enacted in July 1950. It has to be enacted by … of imprisonment for a term which could extend to 14 years under Section 41(2) and 7 years under Section 65 of the Act. Moreover he was denied copies of the day to day proceedings which were essential for

Abhimanyu Vs. The Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

maintained. Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 226 Army Act, 1950 Section 44 Section 164 Conviction and dismissal Petitioner challenged validity of order of conviction and dismissal in Summary Court … him is bad in law. It is submitted that for one offence petitioner cannot be punished under Rule 65 by imposing one month rigorous imprisonment and dismissal from service. It was necessary for the Authority to consider

G.S. Bajwa Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950; Air Force Rules - Rule 102

Reported in : 59(1995)DLT742

The case debated on procedure for recording the statement of witnesses in relevance to Court martial under the Army Act, 1950 - The statements were recorded in hand writing in the open Court and retyped it however the original … prejudicial to the good order and Air Force discipline, and thereby committing offences punishable under Section 41(2) and Section 65 of Air Force Act. 1950. The said General Court Martial was conducted illegally and improperly. In proceeding of

Subedar Major S.N. Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 63, 64 and 65; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22, 23(1), 180, 182 and 184; Army (Amendment) Rules, 1993

Reported in : 76(1998)DLT695

by respondent No. 6, who framed charge sheet against them under Sections 63, 64 and 65 of the Army Act. They were neither supplied with the copy of the charge sheet nor other connected documents. They were made … Army Rule 22 were initiated against them by respondent No. 6, who framed charge sheet against them under Sections 63, 64 and 65 of the Army Act. They were neither supplied with the copy of the charge