Advanced Search Results

Union of India and anr. Vs. Charanjit S. Gill and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 34 to 68, 69, 71, 108, 109, 110, 112, 118, 130, 153, 154, 158, 160, 162, 164, 191 and 192; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 37, 39, 40, 44, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 60, 61, 62, 66(1), 69, 70, 71, 89, 102, 103, 105, 113 and 129; Army Rules, 1959; Indian Army Act, 1911; U.K. Act; Court Martial (Appeals) Act, 1951; Court Martial (appeals) Act, 1968; Uniform Code of Military Justice Act, 1950; Administration of justice Act, 1968; Military Justice Act, 1968; Constitution of India - Article 71(2), 233 and 235; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 107(2)

Reported in : AIR2000SC3425; JT2000(5)SC135; 2000(4)SCALE221; (2000)5SCC742; 2000(2)LC1317(SC); (2000)2UPLBEC1642

keeping in view the report of the Select Committee appointed for the purpose. Prior to the enactment of Army Act, 1950, there existed the Indian Army Act, 1911 made and applied by the British Rulers. Feeling that some of … No. 1 was alleged to has absented himself without leave on four occasions which was an offence under Section 39(1) of the Army Act. He was also charged under Section 63 of the Army Act for violation … their constitutional obligations, as were expected by this Court, except amending Rule 62 providing that after recording the finding in each charge the Court shall

Virendra Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71, 154, 160, 162 and 164(2); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 34(1), 35(1), 57, 58(2), 58(3), 59, 59-A, 62, 68, 137 and 149; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 33, 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Evidence Act; Army Regulation, 1987

Reported in : 2002(1)WLN252

orders thereto and the order dated 4.7.1991 (Annex. 10-A) by which his petition under Section 164(2) of the Army Act, 1950 (for short, 'the Act') has been rejected by the Central Government. (2). The facts and circumstances giving rise … Singh Bedi) neither Parliament nor the Central constitutional obligations, as were expected by this Court, except amending Rule 62 .....Even today the law relating to the Armed Forces remains static which requires to be changed keeping in

Union of India and Others Vs. Nabib Subedar R. Vanangamudi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52 and 164; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 44, 62(1) and 147; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 33 and 227(4)

Reported in : 1999(2)ALT(Cri)263; 1999(4)KarLJ168

Acts/Rules/Orders:Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52 and 164;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 44, 62(1) and 147;Constitution of India - Articles … Acts/Rules/Orders:Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52 and 164;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 44, 62(1) and 147;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 33

Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India (UOi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 245, 246, 248, 254, 257A, 352, 355 and 356; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 1(2), 130, 131, 144 and 197; Arms Act, 1959; Army Act, 1950; Assam Disturbed Areas Act; Armed Forces (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Armed Forces (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6;

Reported in : AIR1998SC465; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)220; JT1997(9)SC431; 1997(7)SCALE741; (1998)2SCC109; [1997]Supp5SCR469; AIR 1998 SC 431

substance in the complaint, suitable action has been taken against the person concerned under the provisions of the Army Act. The learned Attorney General has placed before us instructions in the form of a list of 'Do's and … as contravention of these instructions is punishable under Sections 41, 42(e), 63 and 64(f) of the Army Act, 1950.61. In State of Uttar Pradesh v. Chandra Mohan Nigam and Ors. : (1978)ILLJ6SC , this Court, while considering … cannot be violated to the prejudice of the Government servant.' [p. 531] 62. In Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Ors. v. Union of India, : … Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura. The expression 'disturbed area' has been defined in Section 2(b) to mean an area which is for the time being declared

Akhil G Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

far as going by the definition of “service matters” in Section 3(o), only over persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Tribunal will have jurisdiction and persons seeking appointment and enrolment concerned do not become subject to the

Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. Hindustam Lever Employees Union and B.S. B ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 3A, 9A, 10A(3A), 18, 19, 25F, 25G, 25O, 36, 36(1) and 38; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 - Rules 25 and 62; Constitution of India - Article 32; Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules; Revised Leave Rules; Civil Service Regulations; Civilians in Defence Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Indian Railway Establishment Code; Karnataka Industrial Rules - Rule 59

Reported in : (2006)ILLJ1119Bom

any such person (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 962 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the … 2A, 18 and 36 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Rule 62 of the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957. No determination of facts was … said unfair labour practice. iii) It is further declared that discontinuation of lines in Hard Soaps Department, a Section of Toilet Soaps Departments, Printing Department and the closure of E.P.C. (Machine Building) Department and the Sulphanation Department,

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that “a militant or terrorist or insurgent, is an ‘Enemy’ within the aforesaid definition [Section 3(x) of the Army Act, 1950]. and it is the bounden duty of all Army Personnel to act against a militant or a terrorist … some cases. Of these 1528 cases documented by the petitioners, they have made a more elaborate documentation of 62 cases. For the purposes of the writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, they have referred

Thankamma K vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

defines “service matters”, which reads thus; “3. Definitions.- xxxxx(o) "service matters", in relation to thepersons subject to the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of … are confined to the persons subject to the Army Act, 1950; the Navy Act,1957; and the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 2 of the Act deals with the applicability of the Act, which reads as follows; “2. Applicability of

Sadashiv Gajanana Bhat Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary, Gover ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

service matters. Hence, prima facie, We have to see whether the applicant comes under the purview of the Army Act 1950. Section 2 of the Army Act 1950, reads as follows:- (1) The following persons shall be subject to this

Santosh Devi Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

and the personnel belonging to Territorial Army are governed by two different Acts. The former is governed by Army Act 1950 while the latter is governed by the Territorial Army Act 1948. It is implicit in Section 9 of … 1961 with effect from 01.07.2008. Our attention was especially drawn to Section 2 titled ‘Ordinary Family Pension’ Regulation 62, which inter alia lays down that, the regulations shall not apply to the members of the Territorial Army