Advanced Search Results

S.N. Purandara Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52 and 109

Reported in : 32(1987)DLT264; ILR1987Delhi427

also for an order/direction in the nature of declaration declaring Sections 52(g), 63, 124 and 125 of the Army Act. 1950, as amended by Act 19 of 1955 (for short the Act) as ultra virus of the Constitution of … Command. Mobile Signal Regiment convening General Courts-Martial as also for an order/direction in the nature of declaration declaring Sections 52(g), 63, 124 and 125 of the Army Act. 1950, as amended by Act 19 of 1955 (for

Jc-116244 Ex-subedar Joginder Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52 and 164(2); Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 - Regulations 16 and 113

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR376]; JT2001(9)SC23; 2001LabIC4012; 2001(7)SCALE263; (2001)9SCC602; 2001(4)SCT1012(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC150

in limine on 8.9.1998. Hence this appeal.2. We notice the relevant provisions of the Army Act and Regulations:-The Army Act, 1950 'Section 52. Offences in respect of property. - Any person subject to this Act who commits any of the following

Harpal Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52; Army Rules, 1950 - Rule 22; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1996(37)DRJ390

General had been duly empowered. The said circular reads as under:- 'IN pursuance of the provisions of the Army Act, 1950 (XLVI of 1950), the Central Government is hereby pleased to empower you, or the officer on whom your … it was posted at Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat. For the administrative purposes, the Company was divided in to six sections, i.e., (1) Mechanical Transport Section (2) Radio Section (3) Cipher, Section (4) Ammunition and Weaponry Section (5) Clothing … said Gcm was ordered for an offence under Armies Act under Section 52(a) which is akin to Section 378 of Indian Penal Code for theft.

Major Anurag Pathak Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 57 and 71; Army Rules - Rule 149; Evidence Act - Sections 45; Defence Service Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR228

against him and charges were framed on 18/7/1998 for the offences under Sections 52(f) and 57(a) of the Army Act, 1950. The General Court Martial convicted the petitioner for the first and the fifth charge i.e. under Sections 52(f) … by the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief are as under:(a) Such an offence as is mentioned in Clause (f) of Section 52 of the Army Act with intent to defraud. In that he, at Bhutan, KM 161 PT Road -

Rajvir Singh Vs. Secretary Ministry of Defence and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Section 122, 52(f), 37

for his trial contending that his trial was barred by time as provided under section 122 of the Army Act, 1950 (for the sake of brevity the Act). 3. A General Court Martial was directed to be convened by … Area for short) to try the appellant on different charges relating to gross financial irregularities punishable under Section 52(f) of the Act. The appellant challenged the order before the Armed Forces Tribunal (in Original Application No. 216

Veer Bhan (Sepoy) Vs. the Chief of the Army Staff and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 115, 161 and 162; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 2A, 33, 33(7), 34, 70, 115(2), 132 and 147; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT667

dated 11th July, 1994 whereby the petitioner was found guilty of the charge under Section 52(b) of the Army Act, 1950 and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of four months and dismissal from service.2. The petitioner joined the Indian

Uma Shanker Pathak Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 130, 164; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 34, 34(1) and 115(2)

Reported in : (1990)IILLJ109All

war trophies captured in 1971 war and entrusted to the petitioner's unit, punishable under Section 52(a) of the Army Act, 1950. The charge-sheet dated September 18,1982 was issued by the Commanding Officer of the petitioner's regiment asking the petitioner

Union of India and Others Vs. Nabib Subedar R. Vanangamudi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52 and 164; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 44, 62(1) and 147; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 33 and 227(4)

Reported in : 1999(2)ALT(Cri)263; 1999(4)KarLJ168

Acts/Rules/Orders:Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52 and 164;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 44, 62(1) and 147;Constitution of India - Articles … Acts/Rules/Orders:Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52 and 164;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 44, 62(1) and 147;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 33

M.L. Jaggi Vs. Mahanagar Telephones Nigam Ltd. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MiscellaneousArbitration

Acts : Telegraph Act, 1985 - Sections 7B; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 63 and 164(2)

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)454; AIR1996SC2476; JT1996(1)SC215; 1996(0)MPLJ1052; 1996(1)SCALE247; (1996)3SCC119; [1996]1SCR25; 1996(1)LC531(SC)

1980, passed by the Central Government dismissing the petition filed by the appellant Under Section 164(2) of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').The appellant held a permanent commission, as an officer, in the regular army … he be tried by General Court Martial. The first charge was in respect of the offence Under Section 52(f) of the Act, i.e. doing a thing intent to defraud, the second charge was alternative to the first

Major E.G. Barsay Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1958)60BOMLR159

charge.14. The second point as regards the legality of the trial is raised under the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, by Mr. Purshottam on behalf of accused No. 1. That again is a point which has been raised … have no jurisdiction subject to certain exceptions. In developing his arguments, Mr. Purshottam relied on the provisions of Section 52 of the Act which deals with offences in respect of property. Section 52(b) refers to dishonest misappropriation or