Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: army act 1950 section 35 · Page 1 of about 330 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 05 2001

M.E.S. Employees Union, A.P. Area, Secunderabad Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-05-2001

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employees Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(2), 27-A, 31, 32 and 35; Financial Regulations - Regulation 288-A; Army Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 276; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : [2002]126STC523(AP)

3rd respondent establishment as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Regulation 288-A of the Financial Regulations framed under the Army Act, 1950 and that the employees working under the control of the 3rd respondent establishment are not liable to pay … to pay the tax. The learned Counsel also referred to the provisions of Section 32 as well as Section 35 in support of his contention that the profession tax levied under the present Act is only for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2011

Justice P.D. Dinakaran Vs. Hon'Ble Judges Inquiry Committee

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-05-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : The Judges (Inquiry) Act 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6; The Army Act 1950 - Section 130; The Code of the Bengal Money Lenders Act 1940 - Section 35; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 121, 141, 124, 216, 217, 317, 100, 105, 118, 218, 316

his dismissal from service on the ground of violation of the provision contained in Section 130 of the Army Act, 1950. The facts of that case were that the appellant, who was already serving sentence of 28 days rigorous … AIR1964SC1300, a three Judge Bench of this Court considered the question whether the sale made without complying with Section 35 of the Code of the Bengal Money Lenders Act, 1940 was nullity and whether the objection against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2012

S.K. Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Decided on : Aug-14-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Respondent No 2 , 3 and 5 were under statutory obligation as encompassed in Section 126 of the Army Act, 1950 before instituting the Summary Court Martial Proceedings to obtain permission from the criminal court. Challan and list of … Regulation 459 of the Regulation for the Army. 11. Respondent No 5 was under statutory obligation under Rule 35 of Army Rule to convene a joint trial, so that all the facts had come out before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 05 2002

Daya Shankar Tiwari Vs. Chief of the Army Staff, New Delhi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-05-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3) and 106; Army Rules - Rule 17

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2142; (2002)2UPLBEC1634

such, he was declared deserter with effect from 2.5.1996. A Court of Inquiry was heldunder Section 106 of Army Act, 1950 and being a peace deserter, the petitioner was dismissed from service w.e.f. 21.10.1999 in terms of Army Act … this special list must be in medical category 'A' and must not be below 25 years or above 35 years of age on the date of appointment and must also be possessed of the minimum educational qualifications

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1986

Capt. Virendra Kumar Through His Wife Vs. Chief of the Army Staff, New ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-13-1986

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 38, 39, 104, 105 and 106; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 38

Reported in : AIR1986SC1060; 1986CriLJ848; 1986(2)Crimes353(SC); 1986(1)SCALE219; (1986)2SCC217

was made to Section 39 and to Section 105 which states that when a person subject to the Army Act deserts and when his Commanding Officer gives written information thereof to the Civil Police Authorities such authorities shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2009

All India Naval Technical Supervisors Staff Association, Rep. by Its S ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-30-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Members of the Armed Forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State. … also considered Sections 32 and 35. Section 32 prohibits "Local authorities not to levy profession tax and also Section 35 which provides "Grant to local authorities for loss of revenue." Their lordships have also considered the Regulations 288A

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2009

Indian Navy Civilian Employees Union ( Regd. No. 983) Rep. by Its Gene ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Mar-06-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Members of the Armed Forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State. … also considered Sections 32 and 35. Section 32 prohibits "Local authorities not to levy profession tax and also Section 35 which provides "Grant to local authorities for loss of revenue." Their lordships have also considered the Regulations 288A

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2009

All India Naval Stenographers Association and Others Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Feb-24-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Members of the Armed Forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State. … also considered Sections 32 and 35. Section 32 prohibits "Local authorities not to levy profession tax and also Section 35 which provides "Grant to local authorities for loss of revenue." Their lordships have also considered the Regulations 288A

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2009

K. Srinivasan and Others Vs. Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-30-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Members of the Armed Forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State. … also considered Sections 32 and 35. Section 32 prohibits "Local authorities not to levy profession tax and also Section 35 which provides "Grant to local authorities for loss of revenue." Their lordships have also considered the Regulations 288A

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2009

Members of the Combined Civilian Employees Union of Controllerate of Q ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-30-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Members of the Armed Forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State. … also considered Sections 32 and 35. Section 32 prohibits "Local authorities not to levy profession tax and also Section 35 which provides "Grant to local authorities for loss of revenue." Their lordships have also considered the Regulations 288A

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial