Advanced Search Results

M.E.S. Employees Union, A.P. Area, Secunderabad Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employees Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(2), 27-A, 31, 32 and 35; Financial Regulations - Regulation 288-A; Army Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 276; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : [2002]126STC523(AP)

3rd respondent establishment as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Regulation 288-A of the Financial Regulations framed under the Army Act, 1950 and that the employees working under the control of the 3rd respondent establishment are not liable to pay … employers, as the case may be, shall not be liable to pay tax on behalf of such person. Section 31. Power to exempt :--The Government may, by notification, make an exemption or reduction in the rate of tax

Union of India and ors. Vs. Dinesh Prasad.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 39(a), 116, 191, 71; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 31, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 39

On 03.08.2001, Col. A.S. Sehrawat, Commandant, under his signature served a charge sheet under Section 39(a) of the Army Act, 1950 (for short, 'Army Act') on the respondent for the absence without leave for 808 days. The Commandant constituted … of Section 4 of the Army Act, the Central Government has issued SRO 117 dated 28.03.1960 and SRO 318 dated 6.12.1962. SRO 318 has been subsequently amended by SRO 325 dated 31.8.1977. SRO 318 dated 6.12.1962 (as

Indian Defence Service of Engineers Association (Govt. Approved) Vs. U ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of rules- i.e. the Military Engineer Services (Army Personnel), Regulations, 1989 hereafter ("the 1989 Regulations") framed under the Army Act, 1950 and notification bearing no. SRO. 4E dated 09.07.1991 ("the 1991 Rules") framed under proviso to Article 309 of … Swarnakar and Others (Supra), the provision providing for laying the rules before the Legislative was exactly similar to Section 31 of the SEBI Act. It was also held by this Court that the said provision was directory and

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … In August, 1979 the appellant was shifted to Jaipur where also he was kept under close arrest.22. On 31.8.1979 a statutory complaint was made to the Chief of Army Staff but that was not considered at all

Daya Shankar Tiwari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 311(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 105 and 106; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 13, 13(2), 13(3), 13(5) and 17; Army Pension Regulation, 1961 - Regulation 132; Army Regulations, 1987

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC255

copy of that letter was also sent to the wife of the petitioner under Section 105 of the Army Act, 1950. Section 105 of the Army Act is quoted below :'105. Capture of deserters--(1) Whenever any person subject to this … opp. party No. 4 annexed as Annexure-3 to the writ petition which was served to the petitioner on 31.8.1987.(2) issue mandamus commanding the opp, parties to send the petitioner to be examined by the Medical Board constituted

Ex. Gunner (Operator) T. Suresh, Vs. the Chief of Army Staff New Delhi ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

bad in the eye of law. The said violation would attract the provisions of Section 164 (2) of Army Act, 1950 read with para 365(g) of the Defence Service Regulations 1987. The Court of Inquiry was recorded by Captain … with the applicant. Complaint about the non availability of the copy of the order by the applicant on 31.01.2010 to the Adjutant General and the disobedience of the direction of Delhi High Court did not yield any

Ex. Major R.S. Budhwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Rules, 1959 - Rules 22 to 25 and 37; Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 58(1995)DLT339; 1995(34)DRJ426

was a prima facie case against these three accused persons which ought to be proceeded with under the Army Act, 1950 and that they be tried by a General Court-Martial. Signed at Dinjan this Fourth day of January, 1989.Place: … Mehtab Singh formerly JC 66136K Sub Maj Mehtab Singhof 8 JAT, and liable to trial by Court-martial under Section 123 of theArmy Act, and3. JC 127909 X Sub Kartar Singh of 8 JAT, all attached to 237 … obviate their motivation in the crime:(i) JC-143631 Nb Sub Satyabir Singh (ii) 3173269 Sep. Hari Singh (iii) 3174021 Sep. Kishan Lal (iv) 3175674 Sep. Ashok

Naik Ravi Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71, 80, 110, 116 and 120; Army Rules, 1952 - Rules 22 and 31; Army Regulations - Regulations 8, 9, 16, 19, 23, 24, 30, 44, 52, 53 and 54

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC392

is accordingly dismissed.However, there will be no order as to cost. Service - dismissal - Section 116 of Army Act, 1950, Rules 22 and 31 of Army Rules, 1952 and Regulations 53 and 54 of Army Regulations - charge

Colonel Narendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(II)OLR773

the strong recommendations of his superior Officers and in terms of the provisions contained Section 27 of the Army Act, 1950, Clause-364 of the Defence Service Regulations. The statutory complaint was also not taken into consideration, for which this … Officer (HTO). Major General S.K. Dahiya in the petitioner's Confidential Report (C.R.) for the period from 14.2.2003 to 31.8.2003 and also the subjective endorsements entered in his C.R. by the said HTO, who has entered the same

Ghisilal Vs. State Industrial Court and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 31 and 61; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 16, 18 and 65; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2005(106)FLR801]; (2005)IIILLJ458MP; 2005(3)MPLJ135

apprentice other than an apprentice under Sub-clause (v); but does not include any person-(i) who subject to the Army Act, 1950 (XLVI of 1950), or the Air Force Act, 1950 (XLV of 1950), or Navy Discipline Act, 1957 (62 … order passed by Industrial Court, Bhopal reversing the order of Labour Court and dismissing the application filed under Section 31 read with Section 61 of M. P. Industrial Relations Act, 1960 (in short 'the Act').2. No exhaustive statements