Advanced Search Results

Kr. Chitraketu Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 29; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rule 249

Reported in : AIR1973All405

Act XII of 1894). Even though that Army Act has been repealed there is Section 29 in the Army Act. 1950 granting immunity from arrest for debt to persons subject to the Army Act for so long as they

Nripen Sarma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Commanding Officer that he would be tried by the Summary Court Martial (SCM) for the offence committed under Army Act, 1950 (Section 46A). Copies of the summary of evidence and additional summary of evidence along with the charge sheet were … as in patient in the family ward of 165 Military Hospital. Sd/- (Ved Rattan) Colonel Commanding OfficerPlace: FieldDated: 29 January 985. After the aforesaid developments the Summary Court Martial was held and according to the petitioner the

Smt. Saraswati Devi and anr. Vs. District Magistrate and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 29 and 40; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965All236

purpose of N.C.C. - Section 29 of Defence of India Act, 1962 and Section 3(vi) and (xi) of Army Act, 1950 - order under Section 29 whereby immovable property was requisitioned for the purpose of N.C.C. can not be

Indian Defence Service of Engineers Association (Govt. Approved) Vs. U ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of rules- i.e. the Military Engineer Services (Army Personnel), Regulations, 1989 hereafter ("the 1989 Regulations") framed under the Army Act, 1950 and notification bearing no. SRO. 4E dated 09.07.1991 ("the 1991 Rules") framed under proviso to Article 309 of … them. 4. In these circumstances, urge the petitioners, the 1989 regulations were framed and brought into force under Section 192 of the Army Act. It is submitted that these regulations did not in any manner seek to … 309 of the Constitution of India as well as the notification dated 29.06.2004 issued by Ministry of Defense (MoD)- which amended the 1991 Rules. The

M/S. Birla Jute and Industries Ltd. Vs. Rajeshwar Mahato and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25-F;; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 254;; Industrial Employment (Standing Order) Act, 1946;; Industrial Disputes Amendment Act, 1982;; Air Force Act, 1950;; Army Act, 1950;; Navy Act, 1957;; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 29(2)

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT83(HC),[1998(80)FLR985],(1999)ILLJ957Cal

any such person :--(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950). or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950). or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police … below the appellant raised a plea that the first respondent is not a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as he was incharge of one of the three shifts of … of Goa was a special law. In view of provision of section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 it was held that the provision of

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act,1934; or (ii) who is employed in the … to such apprentice.' 28. Section 19 deals with the records and returns. 29. Section 20 deals with settlement of disputes which is relevant for our … intended to give effect to these objectives.' Now we shall examine the necessary provisions of the Act. 5. Section 2 deals with the definition. Section 2(aa) defines 'apprentice' which means a person who is undergoing apprenticeship training

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … was mentioned as PW1 he was produced on 30.10.1979.26. In the Summary of Evidence recorded between 9.10.1979 and 29.11.1979, 18 witnesses were examined. None of them stated anything which could be put against the appellant.27. It is

Subhash Chandra Sarkar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 41 and 164; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 25

Reported in : AIR1973MP191; (1972)IILLJ611MP

226 of the Constitution would be able to interfere with the decision of a Court constituted under the Army Act, 1950, subject to the limitations pertaining to interference with decisions of Special Tribunals of course, as provided by Sub-clause … complaint under Section 27 of the Army Act (Vide Petitioner's Annexure-4), dated 29-2-1968. It appears that this statutory complaint was withheld by the Head of … such he could not have been tried by the General Court-Martial. On that contention the petitioner's conviction under Section 304 read with Section 149, Indian Penal Code and the sentence of six years' rigorous imprisonment was sought

Jaideep Singh Sandhu Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 90(1)

Reported in : 1995IIIAD(Delhi)1137; 1995(34)DRJ307

1600.00 per month. The compensation was awarded in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 90(i) of the Army Act 1950 (46 of 1950). The order reads as follows: 'TO The Chief of the Army Staff, New Delhi. SUBJECT: … the army personnel and the rights of the wife and children have to be harmonised. Sections 28 and 29 are not restrictions on the right of the wife/children from moving the Government under Section 90(i). They are

Major Subhash Chandra Sarkar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1972MPLJ449

226 of the Constitution would be able to interfere with the decision of a Court constituted under the Army Act, 1950, subject to the limitations pertaining to interference with decisions of Special Tribunals. Of course, as provided by Sub-clause … complaint under Section 27 of the Army Act (Vide petitioner's Annexure-4), dated 29-2-1968. It appears that this statutory complaint was withheld by the head of … such he could not have been tried by the General Court-Martial. On that contention the petitioner's conviction under Section 304 read with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, and the sentence of six years' rigorous imprisonment was sought