Advanced Search Results

CaptaIn C.P. Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC49; (1997)3UPLBEC1702

the petitioner for grant of permanent commission and rejection of his statutory complaint under Section 27 of the Army Act. 1950- The first contention advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the petitioner was illegally

Lt. Col. B.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 26, 27 and 33

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT181

in the case of the petitioner. The learned Counsel referred to Sections 26, 27 and 33 of the Army Act, 1950. 11. Section 26 provides for remedy of aggrieved persons other than .officers. The provisions give right to such

M.E.S. Employees Union, A.P. Area, Secunderabad Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employees Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(2), 27-A, 31, 32 and 35; Financial Regulations - Regulation 288-A; Army Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 276; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : [2002]126STC523(AP)

3rd respondent establishment as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Regulation 288-A of the Financial Regulations framed under the Army Act, 1950 and that the employees working under the control of the 3rd respondent establishment are not liable to pay … authorities are in no way affected by such exemption. The learned Counsel also referred to the provisions of Section 2(e), which defines the term 'employee' and contended that the members of the petitioners would not fall under … competence to enact law to impose professional tax as provided under Article 276 of the Constitution of India, read with Entry 60 of the List-11

Chandra Kumar Chopra Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Section 164(1), 27, 130, 109, 122, 71, 72, 73, 63; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 44

to interfere with the order dated July 20, 1990 whereby the confirming authority under Section 164 of the Army Act, 1950 (for short ‘the Act’) had passed an order of confirmation as regards the sentence of cashiering but reduced … members of the composition of Court Martial on the foundation that he had lodged a statutory complaint under Section 27 of the Act before the Central Government regarding certain irregularities against the Commander of the Sub Area and

C.V.V. Reddy Vs. Team Leader, Army Team Bharat Dynamics Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 5, 14, 21, 33 and 226

Reported in : 1992(2)ALT363; (1993)ILLJ194AP

critical moment, cannot have any application to the facts of the present case. 38. Section 27 of the Army Act 1950 indicates a remedy for aggrieved officers in the following terms : 'Any officer who deems himself wronged by

Lt. Col. (Retd.) Ashok Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123; Constitution of India - Article 77(3); Transaction of Business Rules, 1961 - Rule 3; Constitution (Forty-forth Amendment), 1978 - Sections 12; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 27 and 39

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2688

of an army officer. It is dealt with under Regulation 361 of the Defence Services Regulation read with Section 27 of the Army Act, 1950. The subject Complaints, petitioners and Appeals is a separate chapter the index of … is borne by the record from the order for the assembly of a General Court Martial under the Army Act, 1950. The communique has been issued by the Central Officer Commanding, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Orissa. The place is

Colonel Narendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(II)OLR773

the strong recommendations of his superior Officers and in terms of the provisions contained Section 27 of the Army Act, 1950, Clause-364 of the Defence Service Regulations. The statutory complaint was also not taken into consideration, for which this

Brigadier Rakesh Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Represented by the Se ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR950

not dealt with and considered by the competent authority. According to the provisions of Section 27 of the Army Act, 1950 read with the procedures laid down in Para 364 of the Regulations for the Army, Revised Edition, 1987,

C.i.C.-28512 H.J.L.T. Col. Katti Gopal Reddy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

contained in annexure 7 by reason of which statutory complaint of the petitioner under Section 27 of the Army Act, 1950 has been rejected. A prayer has also been made to direct the respondents to re-consider the case of

Indian Air Force Employees Union Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1975 - Sections 4, 27 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 33 and 276; Civil Service Rules; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 21; ;Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments (Amendment) Act, 1991; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments Ordinance, 1996; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments (Amendment) Act, 1997; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments (Amendment) Act, 2000

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR804; 2003(5)BomCR817; 2003(4)MhLj609

The Union of India took acontrary stand and upholding that stand theSupreme Court observed as follows:'In enacting the Army Act, 1950 in sofar as it restricts or abrogates any ofthe fundamental rights of the members ofthe Armed Forces, Parliament … anyamount being deducted from their salaries andwages towards the tax under the said Act. It iscontended that under Section 27(a) of the saidAct members of armed forces of the said Unionserving in any part of the state are