Advanced Search Results

Lt. Col. B.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 26, 27 and 33

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT181

in the case of the petitioner. The learned Counsel referred to Sections 26, 27 and 33 of the Army Act, 1950. 11. Section 26 provides for remedy of aggrieved persons other than .officers. The provisions give right to such

Ms. Madhushree Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30(2), 80HHC, 90, 139, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 162, 164(2), 234A, 240, 256(1), 256(2), 260A, 269SS, 270, 271, 271(1), 271(1B), 271(5), 271D, 273, 273(2), 273B, 274, 275, 276C; Finance Act, 2008; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2), 23, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(6) and 34; Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment in Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986; Wealth Tax Act; Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Services, Common/ Combined Examination Act, 2002; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 - Sections 26; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax Rules; Army Rules; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)

petition of the petitioner was required to record reasons. The Supreme Court after discussing the scheme of the Army Act, 1950 and the Rules framed thereunder came, to the conclusion that under Section 162 of the said Act reasons … under the Rules framed under the Bombay Sales-tax Act, 1959. By virtue of the amendment brought about in Section 26 of the Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 (Maharashtra Act 9 of 1989) the facility

Nagendra Kumar Tripathi Vs. Chief of Army Staff and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 26; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC842

discharge of the petitioner from the Army he has preferred a statutory complaint under Section 26 of the Army Act, 1950. If has been alleged by the petitioner that said statutory complaint has not been decided so far.4. In

Parimal Sarkar Vs. Union of India Service Through the Secretary Minist ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

opponents felt that the petitioner could have filed statutory complaint under the provisions of Section 26 of the Army Act, 1950. These two aspects were contested by the petitioner in paragraph-7 of the rejoinder by rightly mentioning that statutory

Sushil Kumar Pandey Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

A decision was taken to initiate summary Court Martial proceeding for his absence under Section 39(a) of the Army Act, 1950 and the appellant participated in the said proceeding and put his signature on the relevant documents. Thereafter, punishment … facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the appellant' was enrolled in the Bihar Regiment on 26th November, 1997 and taken on strength as a Sepoy in this unit on 9th November, 1998 at Cooch

M.Z.H. Khan Vs. Chief of Army Staff, New Delhi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3(4), 26, 27, 56, 56(A), 63, 71, 116, 122, 130, 164(2), 169, 169(1), 169(3) and 169(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 33, 33(7), 34, 34(1), 34(2), 36, 106 to 133, 184 and 203; Constitution of India - Article 22(I)

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2794; (2001)3UPLBEC2202

three months in civil jail,(b) to be dismissed from service.4. Petitioner filed statutory petition under Section 164(2) of Army Act, 1950, which was kept pending and not decided hence the petitioner filed a Writ Petition No. 37038 of 1998. … knowing or having reason to believe such accusation to be false ; or(b) in making a complaint under Section 26 or Section 27 makes any statement affecting the character of any person subject to this Act, knowing or

In Re: an Appln. for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 164(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

or he thinks fit.23. We may also notice here that a pari material provision is contained under the Army Act, 1950. Section 164 therein also provides for confirmation of the finding or sentence of the Court- Martial authority by a … Court ( hereinafter referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any

In Re: for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162 and 164(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

or he thinks fit.19. We may also notice here that a pari material provision is contained under the Army Act, 1950. Section 164 therein also provides for confirmation of the finding or sentence of the Court- Martial authority by a … Court ( hereinafter referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any

Udai Singh Dagar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Veterinary Council Act, 1984 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 15, 22, 23, 23(1), 25, 30 and 67; Trade Unions Act; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Bombay Veterinary Practitioners Act, 1953 - Sections 14, 19, 24 and 25; Indian Army Act, 1911; Army Act, 1950; Maharashtra Veterinary Practitioners Act, 1971 - Sections 18, 18(1), 18(2), 23, 26, 33, 37, 38 and 38(1); Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samities Act, 1961 - Sections 100(1); East Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1949; Pepsu Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 2008 BK; Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1963; Drugs Act; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Pharmacy Act; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR2007SC2599; 2007(6)ALLMR(SC)447; 2007(2)BLJR2218; JT2007(7)SC127; 2007(7)SCALE278; (2007)10SCC306

law has been convicted under the Army Act or under the Indian Army Act, 1911 or under the Army Act, 1950, of an offence which is also a cognizable offence as so defined and any person who after due … 1971 Act contained an identical provision which is in pari materia with the provisions of the 1953 Act. Section 26 empowers the Council to call for information and attend examination. Section 33 provided for control in the following

inder SaIn Bakshi S/O Bakshi Anant Ram Vs. Union of India, Through Sec ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 197, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2), 372(1) and 447; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; The Civilians in defense Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1952 - Rules 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 24, 25, 26 and 31; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 240, 240(3) and 241; Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules - Rules 49 and 55; Railway Establishment Code, 1959 - Rules 148(3) and 149(3); Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Army Act, 1950; Indian Air Force Act, 1950; Civil Service Regulations - Regulation 197-A - Schedule - Articles 442 and 443; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 43-A

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi220

such penalties. These Rules apply to every person paid from defense services estimates and nto subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934, and the Indian Air Force Act, 1950, who is in the whole … statement, viz., that in matters at defense personnel the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts is impliedly barred under Section 9, Civil Procedure Code. (This appears to have been raised by way of amendment to the written statement … On the basis of the check-up results the appellant was suspended on 26-6-1950 and was simultaneously transferred to Namkum in Bihar, At Namkum, a charge-sheet