Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...
Delhi
Nov-13-2002
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)
101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)
who behaves in a manner unbecoming his position can be removed from service under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950, read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 without being tried by a Court Martial under Section … 1999 in C.W.P. No. 984/1996 whereby the order of the Air Officer, Commanding in Chief, dated on August 21, 1995, dismissing the respondent from service and the order of the Appellate Authority dated January 11, 1996 maintaining
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarcharan Singh Premi Vs. the Officer Commanding Army, Military Hospit ...
Chennai
Nov-29-1968
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 15
AIR1970Mad176
18-2-1967 and was a temporary Commissioned Officer, The Army Act, 1950, is applicable to the persons mentioned in Section 2 of the Act. Section 2(1)(a) states that Officers, Junior Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers of the Regular Army … a review petition to the Director General, Armed Forces Medical Service on 7-3-1967 under Section 27 of the Army Act, 1950, and as the petitioner did not receive any immediate redress on his application for review, he submitted a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskColonel Aniltej Singh Dhaliwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 2 ors.
Delhi
Mar-22-2002
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(2), 71, 153 and 163; Army Rules; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A
2002(64)DRJ854
appropriate orders on the question of sentence in exercise of the powers vested under Section 163 of the Army Act, 1950, after modifying the Court's previous order dated 10.5.1999. This application was vehemently opposed by the Petitioner herein in … of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Petitioner is still subject to the Army Act as per Section 2(2).' However subsequently it has been pleaded by the Respondent in paragraph 13 of the Counter Affidavit that 'it
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashok Leyland Limited Vs. A. Vijayakumar and anr.
Chennai
Dec-02-1980
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Madras Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 4(1)
(1981)IILLJ9Mad
led to that dispute but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 or (ii) who is employed in … whether the first respondent is a workman within the meaning of S. 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act Section 2(s) of the Act contains the following definition : 'Workman means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.A.D. Civilian Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...
Mumbai
Jul-07-2006
Other Taxes
Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 - Sections 3 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment (Amendment) Act, 1991; Trade Unions Act; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 3, 4 and 21; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(10); Air Force Law; Constitution of India - Article 14, 19(1) and 33; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Defence Service (Field Services Liability) Rules, 1957; Army Rules, 1954
2006(6)ALLMR256; 2006(5)BomCR901; 2006(5)MhLj503
members of the armed forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State.Sub-sections … the Air Force Act 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 apply. In paragraph 5 Division Bench finds that Section 2(1) of Army Act and Air Force Act gives list of persons who shall be subject to those Acts.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Z.H. Khan Vs. Chief of Army Staff, New Delhi and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-29-2001
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3(4), 26, 27, 56, 56(A), 63, 71, 116, 122, 130, 164(2), 169, 169(1), 169(3) and 169(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 33, 33(7), 34, 34(1), 34(2), 36, 106 to 133, 184 and 203; Constitution of India - Article 22(I)
2001(4)AWC2794; (2001)3UPLBEC2202
three months in civil jail,(b) to be dismissed from service.4. Petitioner filed statutory petition under Section 164(2) of Army Act, 1950, which was kept pending and not decided hence the petitioner filed a Writ Petition No. 37038 of 1998.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJay Shiv Kushwaha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-19-2002
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 20(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 22, 39 and 121; ;Army Rules - Rule 13
2002(3)AWC1969; (2002)3UPLBEC2098
12th November, 2001, after being absent for 53 days; 10 days rigorous imprisonment under Section 39(a) of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as Army Act) was awarded to the petitioner. The petitioner was discharged from service with … D. Mukherji, counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. K. Srivastava. Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the discharge order dated 23rd December, 2001. Further
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSom Datt Datta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-20-1968
Criminal
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 50(2), 121(4), 125, 126, 139(6), 164 and 165; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 174 and 549; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 3 and 5; Constitution of India - Article 32; Defence Services Regulation - Regulation 527
AIR1969SC414; 1969CriLJ663; [1969]2SCR177
it is necessary to scrutinize the provisions of the Army Act in some detail. Section 2 of the Army Act, 1950 (Act 46 of 1950), hereinafter called the 'Army Act', describes the different categories of army personnel who are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandra Pal Singh Vs. General Officer, Commanding-in-chief, Headquarte ...
Allahabad
Aug-01-1997
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 133 and 164(2); Army Rules, 59 and 60; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 161(3), 164 and 207; Constitution of India - Article 226
1998(1)AWC53
his earlier statement. There is no dispute that the petitioner being an army personnel is subject to the Army Act, 1950. Chapter X of the Act deals with Courts Martial and Chapter XI deals with Procedure of Courts Martial. … for quashing the finding and sentence of the General Court Martial and the order rejecting the petition under Section 164(2) of the Army Act.2. The petitioner was tried by General Court Martial for stabbing Sepoy Driver Rabari
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamji Das and anr. Vs. Rajendra Mohan Mathur and anr.
Allahabad
May-26-2006
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1) and 21(2); Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1923; Indian Soldiers (Litigation) (Amendment) Act, 1925; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Army Act - Sections 2(1)
2006(3)AWC2596
Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1925, the words 'Indian Soldier' has been defined as any person subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Indian Air Force Act, 1950. Under Section 2(1)(a) of the Army Act as well as 2
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »