Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: army act 1950 section 19 · Page 1 of about 911 results (0.024 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 29 1968

Harcharan Singh Premi Vs. the Officer Commanding Army, Military Hospit ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-1968

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 15

Reported in : AIR1970Mad176

a review petition to the Director General, Armed Forces Medical Service on 7-3-1967 under Section 27 of the Army Act, 1950, and as the petitioner did not receive any immediate redress on his application for review, he submitted a … governed by the Army Act and any dismissal and the termination of his service can only be under Section 19 of the Act, i. e. subject to the provisions of the Army Act and the Rules and Regulations

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)

who behaves in a manner unbecoming his position can be removed from service under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950, read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 without being tried by a Court Martial under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 1998

Saroj Taneja Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-22-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14

Reported in : 1998VIAD(Delhi)829; 77(1999)DLT233

of this Court was upheld by the Supreme Court. Later on, a notice under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950 read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 was issued. On the 30th of October, 1991 this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 11 2001

Union of India and ors. Vs. Harjeet Singh Sandhu Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-11-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 34 to 68, 45, 69, 70, 71, 74, 101, 109, 117, 121, 122, 123, 125, 127, 153, 158, 160, 164, 165 and 191; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14 and 71; Constitution of India - Artilce 33, 310 and 311

Reported in : AIR2001SC1772; JT2001(4)SC597; 2001LabIC1707; 2001(3)SCALE336; (2001)5SCC593; [2001]2SCR1127; 2001(2)SCT1018(SC); 2002(1)SLJ1(SC); (2001)2UPLBEC1397

result whereof Bhagwan Das died. A General Court martial (GCM, for short) was convened under Section 109 of Army Act, 1950 which tried the respondent and the other officers. On 26.12.1978 the GCM awarded the sentence of forfeiture of … ground that the proceedings were unjust. On 20.12.1979, a show cause notice was issued to the respondent under Section 19 of the Act read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 (hereinafter the Rules, for short) calling

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1988

H.C. Dhingra Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-13-1988

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1950 - Rule 14

Reported in : ILR1988Delhi33; 1989RLR101

upon the petitioner to show cause why his services should not be terminated under section 19 of the Army Act, 1950 read with Army Rule 14. (2) The writ petition was filed on 25th April 1983. By an interim

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2006

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Capt. Satendra Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-18-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 13A; Defence Service Regulations

Reported in : JT2006(7)SC202; 2006(7)SCALE200; (2006)9SCC570; 2007(1)SLJ258(SC)

2.8.2000. On 21.9.2001 order was passed retiring the respondent from service in terms of Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950 (in short the 'Act') read with Rule 13-A of the Rules.4. Respondent filed a Writ Petition before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2005

M.M. Malhotra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act 1950 - Sections 19, 45 and 191(2); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 45, 46 and 191(5); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3) and 16; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16 and 16(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 1 to 4, 14 and 16(4); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2006SC80; 2006(1)BomCR661; [2005(107)FLR1006]; JT2005(9)SC506; 2006(1)MhLj1; 2006MPLJ1(SC); 2005(8)SCALE202; (2005)8SCC351; 2006(1)SLJ303(SC)

the action was taken by departmental proceedings. This Court had occasion to consider an identical provision in the Army Act 1950 (in short 'Army Act') and Army Rules, 1954 (in short 'Army Rules'). Constitutional validity of Rule 14 of … which he was called upon to show-cause as to why he should not be dismissed/removed from service under Section 19 of the Air Force Act; 1950 (in short the 'Act') read with Rule 16 of the Air Force

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2001

R.K. Gogna Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-20-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 17, 19, 45, 63, 121, 122, 153, 160 and 199; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379; Army Rules - Rule 14; Army Order; Army Regulations, 1962; Limitation Act

Reported in : 2001(60)DRJ505

Staff an alternative remedy by way of filing statutory complaint is provided for under Section 17 of the Army Act, 1950. 5. The court considered the averments made in the writ petition as also in the counter affidavit. In … record. By a communication dated 6.6.1996, the respondents issued a show cause notice to the petitioner purportedly under Section 19 of the Army Act read with Army Rule 14 intimating the petitioner that the Chief of Army Staff

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1996

Major Radha Krishan Vs. Union of India and Others Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-25-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 34, 37, 122 and 127; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 473

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(SC)636; AIR1996SC3091; [1996(73)FLR1430]; JT1996(3)SC650; 1996(3)SCALE241; (1996)3SCC507; [1996]3SCR836; 1996(1)LC817(SC); (1996)2UPLBEC1410; MANU/SC/0811/1996

calling upon him to show cause why his services should not be terminated under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950 ('Act' for short) read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954('Rules' for short) for the misconducts he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 1983

R. Viswan and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-1983

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(4), 21 and 63; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 19 to 21

Reported in : AIR1983SC658; 1983(2)Crimes392(SC); (1983)IILLJ157SC; 1983(1)SCALE497; (1983)3SCC401; [1983]3SCR60

relating to the interpretation of Article 33 of the Constitution. The question is whether Section 21 of the Army Act 1950 read with Chapter IV of the Army Rules 1954 is within the scope and ambit of Article 33 … the interpretation of Article 33 of the Constitution. The question is whether Section 21 of the Army Act 1950 read with Chapter IV of the Army Rules 1954 is within the scope and ambit of Article 33

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial