Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: army act 1950 section 186 · Page 1 of about 38 results (0.034 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 2006

Ex. Rfn. Hoshiar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Pay and Allowance Regulation Rules, 1955 - Rule 51; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 178 and 179; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 34, 38, 39, 80, 91 and 92; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 173, 186, 187 and 189; Army Regulations - Regulations 178 to 187 and 196 to 200; Defence Services Regulations - Regulations 51 and 123; Civil Services Regulations

Reported in : (2006)144PLR97

are extracted below the facility of reference:Regulation 51: FORFEITURE OF PAY AND ALLOWANCES51. A person, subject to the Army Act, 1950 will forfeit his pay and allowances (including expatriation allowance) for every day (as defined in Section 92 of … case was recommended for grant of service element of pension from 3.1.1974 for life by referring to Regulation 186/167 of the Pension Regulation for the Army, 1961, Part-II. The papers were sent to Defence Pension Disbursing Officer-respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1985

i.T.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-1985

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1985(Supp)SCC476; [1985]Supp1SCR145

Reddy, J.).183. Prior to all this, in the case of State of Maharashtra and Ors. v. The Salvation Army, Western India Territory : [1975]3SCR475 this Court had to consider the question of fee under Bombay Public Trust … Western India Territory : [1975]3SCR475 this Court had to consider the question of fee under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The Court noted that fee was defined as a charge for a special service rendered to individuals by … solely for earning income or to divert the surplus for other objects. 186. Thirdly, it was urged that many items of work envisaged in the … market fee which could be levied by the various market committees under Section 23 of the Punjab Act was fifty paise for every hundred rupees.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2000

Hav. Ved Prakash Sangwan Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-04-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20 and 23; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 11, 12 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)749

AND ITEM OF TABLE IN RULE 17 OF ARMY RULES 1954 READ WITH ARMY ACT SECTION 20(3) OF ARMY ACT, 1950. 1. 'Dismissed from service w.e.f. 16 July, 1991 being convicted by Hon'ble Court of Addl Sessions Judge, Bhiwani(Haryana) … instant case, the appellant, who was a havaldar, was convicted under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for committing an offence - Later, he was released by the Supreme Court on the ground of good

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 31 2023

Ravindran. K (Ex. Nk-10358331 H), vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-31-2023

treated as a "Corps" under Rule 187(1)(r) of the Army Rules, 1954, read with Section 3(vi) of the Army Act, 1950. Further the same pensionary provisions as applicable to the three defence services are applicable to the DSC and … OAs may be heard along with OA No.88/2015 which is the subject matter of the judgment in WP(C) 18612/2023. The Registry will forward copies of the judgment in these WP(C)s to the Registry of the AFT, Regional

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2023

Rajan M (Ex. Nk-10289856 Y) vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-31-2023

treated as a "Corps" under Rule 187(1)(r) of the Army Rules, 1954, read with Section 3(vi) of the Army Act, 1950. Further the same pensionary provisions as applicable to the three defence services are applicable to the DSC and … OAs may be heard along with OA No.88/2015 which is the subject matter of the judgment in WP(C) 18612/2023. The Registry will forward copies of the judgment in these WP(C)s to the Registry of the AFT, Regional

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2002

Rajinder Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-17-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19 and 20; Constitution of India - Article 310

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)917; 96(2002)DLT432; 2003(1)SLJ1(Delhi); 2002(5)SLR399

The order is as under: The President, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 and all other enabling provisions in this behalf, is pleased to order that the services of IC-3066L Maj. … the judgment of the Supreme Court in M.R. Gupta v. Union of India and Ors 1995 31 ATC 186 where the Supreme has held that denial of salary was a continuing wrong and so long as if

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 1999

Dy. Cit Vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)75TTJ(Del)966

Vice President & J.P. Bengra, J.M. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … (Appeals) are that the assessed made a claim of deduction under section 80-I for a sum of Rs. 186.75 lakhs based on certain calculations. This claim was revised during the course of those proceedings to Rs. 196.39

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1996

Pearl Agencies Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)60TTJ(Del)412

the result, assessees appeal is allowed. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … [1963]48ITR67(SC) , CIT vs. Birla Bros. (P) Ltd. : [1970]77ITR751(SC) as well as the circular published in (1990) 186 ITR 28 . He submitted that all the conditions prescribed in s. 36(2) have been fully complied with.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1973

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-25-1973

Subject : Land Acquisition

courts-martial extends to all crimes, not capital, committed against public law by an officer or soldier of the Army within the limits of the territory in which he is serving, this jurisdiction is not exclusive, but only … Code of Military Justice. The case is somewhat unlike McClaughry v. Deming, 186 U. S. 49 , where a court-martial was constituted of officers of … question in O'Callahan was the appropriateness of the exercise of jurisdiction by a military forum, pursuant to an Act of Congress, over a nonservice-connected offense when balanced against the guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Pp.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2010

indeevarakshan Nair M.P. and Others (Ex. No.13875382 Rect), Kerala Ver ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : Jul-16-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

to Persons Below Officer Rank ('PBOR') as petitioners in these cases are PBORs. 8. Section 191 of the Army Act, 1950 empowers the Central Government to make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of that … PBOR. Regulations 185 and 185A deals with the period for which the payment has to be made. Regulation 186 deals with pensionary awards when the accepted degree of disability is less than 20%. Until 1.3.1968, if the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial