Advanced Search Results

Sub. B.K. Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 53 and 164(2); Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 182; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2008(2)SLJ287(Delhi)

of the defense personnel. Under Regulation 16 (a) when an officer, as defined in Section 3(xviii) of the Army Act, 1950 is cashiered, dismissed or removed from service, the President has the discretion of either forfeiting the pension or … as the same are in complete violation of the Army Act and the Rules. By reference to Rule 182 of the Army Rules 1954, learned Counsel had argued that the proceedings of a court of inquiry were

Capt. V.N. Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 122; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3), 14(4) and 182; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Army Regulation

Reported in : 2005(3)SLJ196(NULL)

May, 1989, the petitioner received another show cause notice, purported to have been issued under Section 19 of Army Act, 1950 read with Rule 14 of Army Rules, 1954 calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why … as the petitioner was even promoted, after the proceedings of summary of evidence were dropped. Relying on Rule 182 of Army Rules, 1954, it is stated in the rejoinder affidavit that the proceedings of the Court of

Gurman Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1984CriLJ718

assembly of the court of enquiry is in the nature of review which is not authorised by the Army Act, 1950 or the rules framed thereunder and as such the convening of the Court of Inquiry for the second … against any person subject to the Army Act as provided in Rule 182. Therefore, the irregularity, if any, in holding the court of enquiry does … compensation of the loss was preferred by the Supply Depot ASC Panagarh in accordance with the provisions of Section 78B of the Indian Railways (Amendment) Act of 1961 which was registered by the railways and the same

Ratan Kumar Dhauria Vs. L. Union of India

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

wife of the petitioner by the concerned authority. 5. Petitioner preferred an appeal under section 164 of the Army Act 1950 and also an application under section 182 of the Act before the GOC-IN-C, Head Quarter, Eastern Command for

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ram Sunder Ram

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 17, 19, 20 and 72; ;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 13(3), 177 and 182; ;Air Force Rules - Rule 137; ;Constitution of India - Article 33

Reported in : 2005(4)CHN361

that the writ petitioner/ respondent was discharged from army service under the provisions of section 20 of the Army Act, 1950 read with Army Rules 13(3)(V) read with Clause (v) of the Table and after affording the writ petitioner/respondent … the petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice. The proceeding of a Court of Inquiry is controlled under Rule 182 of the Army Rules. The learned Counsel for the writ petitioner/respondent very much relied on Rule 182 of

Jandel Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987CriLJ1387; 1987MPLJ100

this case is that the petitioner was convicted in the course of a Court-martial proceeding held under the Army Act, 1950, (for short the 'Act') and he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. He is serving his … Central Jail from where he preferred this petition to this Court claiming inter alia that his application under Section 182 of the Army Act is awaiting consideration of the Chief of the Army Staff (Respondent No. 2) for

General Court Martial and ors. Vs. Col. Aniltej Singh Dhaliwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalService

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 94; Army Rules - Rule 182; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 133 and 134

Reported in : AIR1998SC983; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)470; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)185; 1998CriLJ1402; 1998(1)Crimes62(SC); JT1998(4)SC228; 1997(7)SCALE717; (1998)1SCC756; [1997]Supp6SCR470; (1998)1UPLBEC24

is highly distressing. We record our displeasure. Criminal - evidence - Rule 182 of Army Rules, 1954 - appeal against Order of High Court wherein … following incidents and offences will be reported :-(a) All cases of assault and affray where persons subject to Army Act are involved.(b) Breaches of discipline :-(i) Collective insubordination.(ii) Suicide, attempted or suspected suicide; (iii) Murder or an attempt … on error that document was inadmissible in evidence.HELD See paras 11 to 13. - INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 Section 3: [S.B.Sinha & Dr.Mukundakam Sharma,JJ] Appreciation of evidence - Murder Witness giving priority to giving medical aid to

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Seth Talwar and Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961

Reported in : [2000]243ITR190(Delhi)

the said clubbing was not justified - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … there was not interlacing and interlocking of the two firms - Hence, it was held that under Sections 182, 183, 2(31) and 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the said clubbing was not justified - LABOUR

Nripen Sarma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Commanding Officer that he would be tried by the Summary Court Martial (SCM) for the offence committed under Army Act, 1950 (Section 46A). Copies of the summary of evidence and additional summary of evidence along with the charge sheet were … 7 was relied upon, but the author of the report was not examined to prove the report.22. Rule 182 of the Army Rules 1954 provides that the proceeding of Court of enquiry, or any confession, the statements

Subedar Major S.N. Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 63, 64 and 65; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22, 23(1), 180, 182 and 184; Army (Amendment) Rules, 1993

Reported in : 76(1998)DLT695

in the light of the amendment to the Army Rules 22 and 182 by Army (Amendment) Rules, 1993 on and from 6.12.1993 and in view … by respondent No. 6, who framed charge sheet against them under Sections 63, 64 and 65 of the Army Act. They were neither supplied with the copy of the charge sheet nor other connected documents. They were made … Army Rule 22 were initiated against them by respondent No. 6, who framed charge sheet against them under Sections 63, 64 and 65 of the Army Act. They were neither supplied with the copy of the charge