Advanced Search Results

Colonel D.D. Pawar, C-25415-a Vs. Commander Hq Andhra Sub-area, Secund ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 19, 34 to 70, 71, 80 to 85, 109, 118, 122, 122(1), 122(3), 191(1) and 191(2); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 22, 22(2), 53, 70 and 177 to 185; Army (Amendment) Act, 1992; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 469 and 469(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 113, 545 and 621; Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD56; 2001(5)ALT52

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. A common question as to the interpretation of Section 122 of the Army Act, 1950 ('the Act' for brevity) falls for consideration in both these appeals and hence they are being disposed of … the provisions of para 518 regulations for the Army, 1987 revised edition read with Army Rules 180 and 181.3. In furtherance thereof yet another Court of Inquiry was convenedand a report was submitted on 30-9-1996. After receiving

Prahlad Industries Vs. Income Tax Officer.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1995)52TTJ(Del)345

years. Income Tax Act 1961 s.69B - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … Strips Ltd. v. ITO (1979) 116 ITR 825 (P&H) (FB), and Daulat Ram & Ors. v. ITO (1990) 181 ITR 119 (AP) relied on [w.r.t. (ii)]. Application : Also to current assessment years. Income Tax Act 1961

Major S. Nagendran Vs. Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Rep. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14(2); Army Regulations, 1962 - Regulation 333(C); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1991(3)ALT271; (1992)IILLJ559AP

two grounds. (1) Any action terminating the services of the employee is subject to the provisions of the Army Act, 1950 and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder. Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 contemplates that before proposing … in Proceedings No. 71902/525/D.V.-4 dated 22-6-1988 to show-cause as to why his services should not be terminated under Section 19 of the Army Act read with Rule 14 of the Rules made thereunder. The petitioner submitted a

S. Nagendran Vs. Government of India, Ministry of Defence and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Army Act - Sections 19; Army Regulations, 1962 - Regulation - 333

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ559AP

on two grounds. Any action terminating the services of the employee is subject to the provisions of the Army Act, 1950 and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder. Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 contemplates that before proposing … No 71902/525/D/V.-4 dated June 22, 1988 to show-cause as to why his service should not be terminated under Section 19 of the Army Act read with Rule 14 of the Rules made thereunder. The petitioner submitted a

Kr. Chitraketu Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 29; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rule 249

Reported in : AIR1973All405

Act XII of 1894). Even though that Army Act has been repealed there is Section 29 in the Army Act. 1950 granting immunity from arrest for debt to persons subject to the Army Act for so long as they … members of the Defence Forces from arrest for debt. This Rule was framed on the basis of Article 181 of the Indian Articles of War (Section 73, Act XII of 1894). Even though that Army Act has

Nand Kishore Mishra Vs. U.O.i. and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

be covered by the expression 'active service'. The expression 'active service' is defined in Section 3(1) of the Army Act, 1950 as under:“3. Definitions.-. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires.-. (i) “active service”, as applied to a … Army Medical Corps, he was travelling from Lucknot to Allahabad on his motorcycle to join his duty at 181, Military Hospital, Allahabad. On the way he was attacked by some miscreants who wanted to snatch away his

Union of India and Another Vs. Mohammed MohiuddIn and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3(1 and 2), 108, 178, 181, 274, 280, 282 and 283; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 295(2) and 300-A; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6(1) and 15(2); Cantonment Land Administration (Amendment) Rules, 1937; Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1337 Fasli; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65 and 90; Municipalities Act - Sections 330; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rules 1(A), 2, 3 and 6; Secunderabad and Aurangabad Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1930; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317-F; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1973 - Sections 11; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 428, 433 and 450

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD376; 2000(6)ALT551

in Counsel GGO No.179, dated 12-9-1836 and 700 dated 3-7-1955 to the Bolaram and Secunderabad cantonments of British Army and subsequently these were extended to the subsidiary force situated at Hyderabad at the instance of Nizam of … learned single Judge took into consideration the contention of the respondents that no permission can be granted under Section 181(a) of the Cantonments Act and the Government may refuse sanction if the right of the builder on the

i.T.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1985(Supp)SCC476; [1985]Supp1SCR145

Reddy, J.).183. Prior to all this, in the case of State of Maharashtra and Ors. v. The Salvation Army, Western India Territory : [1975]3SCR475 this Court had to consider the question of fee under Bombay Public Trust … Western India Territory : [1975]3SCR475 this Court had to consider the question of fee under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The Court noted that fee was defined as a charge for a special service rendered to individuals by … 1121, S.A. de Smith 'Judicial Review of Administrative Action', 4th Edn. pages 181 to 183. In any event the rule of 'audi alteram partem is … market fee which could be levied by the various market committees under Section 23 of the Punjab Act was fifty paise for every hundred rupees.

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

to the aforesaid issue which need to be noted. In The State of Maharashtra and Others vs. Salvation Army, Western India Territory, (1975) 1 SCC 509, this Court had occasion to consider the provisions of Bombay Public … India Territory, (1975) 1 SCC 509, this Court had occasion to consider the provisions of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 wherein, two per cent contribution was required to be paid to Public Trust Administration Fund. This Court noticed … Department to meet the expenses of entire establishment of the Forest Department. 181. Shri Udit Chandra, learned counsel appearing for some of the petitioners has … of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

case, the court was concerned with an interpretation of the expression “trial commenced” under Section 123(2) of the Army Act, 1950. Charges for dereliction of duty were laid against the respondent and action against the Army Act was initiated