Advanced Search Results

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

2 provides that the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, … be deemed to be a criminal court for the purposes of Sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 193, 195, 196 or 228 (45 of 1860) of … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

Subodh Ranjan Ghosh Vs. Major N.A.O. Callaghan and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 309, 310 and 311; ;Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 13 and 15

Reported in : AIR1956Cal532,60CWN917,(1957)ILLJ69Cal,(1957)ILLJ69Cal

rules:'3.' These rules shall apply to every person paid from Defence Services Estimates and not subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934, and the Air Force Act, 1950, who is in the whole time … in that application that the service agreement of the petitioner was not in conformity with the requirements of Section 175(3), Government of India Act, 1935, or Article 299 of the Constitution, and it was therefore void, and

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that “a militant or terrorist or insurgent, is an ‘Enemy’ within the aforesaid definition [Section 3(x) of the Army Act, 1950]. and it is the bounden duty of all Army Personnel to act against a militant or a terrorist

Hansraj Gupta and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1973SC2724; (1973)2SCC637; 1973(5)LC821(SC)

who presumably constituted the 'reviewing Tribunal', consisting of 'the Deputy Commissioner of his representive, the commander, Royal Indian Army Supply Corps (C.R.I. A.S.C.) or his representative, and the local purchase officer (Military)'. Three members were to constitute … have come into existence in 1946, would be beyond three years in 1950 so that it would be barred by three years rule of limitation … by Mahesh Chandra Gupta, defendant No. 2, (hereinafter referred to as 'the contractor'), and the Government of India, acting through the Comander, U.P. Area, now represented by the Union of India, defendant No. 1. The Company claimed … Lytton Road, Dehradun. Subject :- Fire-wood contract Dehradun 1944/45 Legal Notice under Section 80 C.P.C. Reference :- Your legal notice dated December 18, 1946, on … 31-12-1946. failed for want of compliance with Section 175(3) of the Govt. of India Act, the plaintiff

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

complaints with respect to commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force At, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out … be deemed to be a criminal court for the purposes of sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 193, 195, 196 or 228 (45 of 1860) of … JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ct'), against an order of

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct

3398223 M Sep Jagjit Singh Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

complaints with respect to commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out … be deemed to be a criminal court for the purposes of sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 193, 195, 196 or 228 of the Indian Penal … (SCM)/District Court Martial (DCM) pertained to the area which falls within the jurisdiction of different Benches established under Section 4 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (which is hereinafter referred as “The Act”). It is also

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

case, the court was concerned with an interpretation of the expression “trial commenced” under Section 123(2) of the Army Act, 1950. Charges for dereliction of duty were laid against the respondent and action against the Army Act was initiated

Braja Sundar Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Orissa

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1976)ILLJ362Ori

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -(i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 … preparation of cover journals, cover notes, certificates, etc. His remuneration was Rs. 175 per month. Some time after the petitioner fell out with the management … Labour and Employment, Government of India declining to refer a dispute for adjudication of the Appellate Tribunal under Section 10(1) read with Section 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.2. The petitioner was first employed as an

Arun Mills Ltd. Vs. Dr. Chandraprasad C. Trivedi

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1976)17GLR291

in the definition of the word workman. These for categories are:(i) a person who is subject to the army Act, 1950, navy (discipline) Act, 1934;(ii) a person, who is employed in the police service or as an officer or … to as the mills and was drawing the basic pay of Rs. 175/- per month and a fixed amount of Rs. 40/- as dearness allowance. … recorded by the presiding officer, 3rd Labour Court, Ahmedabad in recovery application No. 289/67 which was filed under Section 33C(2) of the industrial disputes Act, 1947 (which is hereinafter referred to as the Act). The learned judge