Advanced Search Results

Shiv Parshad Pandey Vs. C.B.i. Through Director, New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 3(2), 17, 52, 53, 57, 75, 77, 77(2), 80, 81 and 84; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 41, 45B, 51A, 52, 53, 53(2) to 106 and 170 to 174; Army Act, 1950

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR934; 2003CriLJ1710; JT2003(2)SC413; 2003(2)SCALE658; (2003)11SCC508; 2003(1)LC640(SC)

: [1996]3SCR785 . In thesaid case considering the similar provision as to thecommencement of a trial in the Army Act, 1950, this Court held :'In the light of the above discussion, we hold that the trialcommences the moment GCM … Rule 41, Rule 45B, Rule 51A, Rule 53, Rule65, Rule 66, Rule 170, to Rule 174.18. Rule 41, we notice, applies only when Section 80 … order dated 8.7.1998 made by thelearned Special Judge, C.B.I., Patiala by which charges wereframed against the appellant under Sections 7 and 13(2) read withSection 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Theappellant sought for quashing of

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that “a militant or terrorist or insurgent, is an ‘Enemy’ within the aforesaid definition [Section 3(x) of the Army Act, 1950]. and it is the bounden duty of all Army Personnel to act against a militant or a terrorist

Hav. Ved Prakash Sangwan Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20 and 23; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 11, 12 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)749

AND ITEM OF TABLE IN RULE 17 OF ARMY RULES 1954 READ WITH ARMY ACT SECTION 20(3) OF ARMY ACT, 1950. 1. 'Dismissed from service w.e.f. 16 July, 1991 being convicted by Hon'ble Court of Addl Sessions Judge, Bhiwani(Haryana) … 323 read with Section 149 IPC. On the basis of conviction by the trial court, the Brigadier Commander, 170 Infantry Brigade passed the following order of dismissal on the 30th of July, 1991:- CAUSE OF DISMISSAL AND

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct

C. Gupta Vs. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceutical Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes (Amended) Act, 1984

Reported in : 2004(2)BomCR575; [2004(101)FLR1109]; (2004)ILLJ952Bom

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934;(ii) who is employed in the police … and order in two writ petitions, the appellant subsequently filed Appeal No. 170 of 2000 which also impugnes the same Judgment and order passed by … of claim for the reasons mentioned therein, the appellant claimed to be a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as his work was of 'skilled, technical and clerical nature, apart

Kulwant Singh (Nk.) S/O Sardar Sadhu Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 33, 226, 227 and 227(4); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 37, 38, 109, 130, 131; Army Rules, 1954 - Sections 39(2), 41, 44, 45, 48 and 95(2); Military Law; Evidence Act - Sections 154

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ985

for alleged offences said to have been committed by them Under Sections 37(c), 38(1) and 63 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').4. In the Sikh Regiment Centre at Ramgarh on 10-6-1984 soldiers waged a … of the petitioners in Court Martial proceedings for alleged offences said to have been committed by them Under Sections 37(c), 38(1) and 63 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').4. In the Sikh … 3362069 and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.)(2) M. P. No. 170 of 1990 (3369816 Hav. Harisingh and Anr. v. Union of India and

Raj Bahadur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)73; 103(2003)DLT30; 2003(71)DRJ785; 2003(1)SLJ219(Delhi); 2003(6)SLR137

service as he was considered unlikely to become an efficient soldier. 10. Reference to Section 15 of the Army Act, 1950 made on behalf of petitioner to assail the impugned order of discharge is simply of no avail to … his option for change of trade, but as his height was 166 cms. against the required height of 170 cms. for soldier GD and 173 cms. for Brigade of the Guards Regiment as per Addl Dte Gen

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

case, the court was concerned with an interpretation of the expression “trial commenced” under Section 123(2) of the Army Act, 1950. Charges for dereliction of duty were laid against the respondent and action against the Army Act was initiated

Khem Chand Khattar Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 34(1988)DLT140

the matter has to give any reasons. In the case of Som DuttDatta (supra), Section 164 of the Army Act, 1950 and the Court Martial proceedings show that no reasons have to be given and there can be conviction

In Re Section 6a Of The Citizenship Act 1955

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Government did not extend the provisions of the Act to other States. On 25 March 1971, the Pakistani Army launched Operation Search Light to curb the Bengali nationalist movement in East Pakistan.130 The migrants before the operation … because of civil disturbance caused due to the political instability in the 80 The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act 1950; Section 2 81 The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act 1950; proviso to Section 2 Page 43 of 94 PART … of the State of Assam.170 The 169 “The Assam Official language Act” 170 The Assam Official Language Act 1960, Section 3 Page 74 of 94