Advanced Search Results

Pradeepta Kumar Mohapatra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 13, 14, 16 and 17; Army Rules - Rules 8 and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 97(2004)CLT34

under the Act or was a trainee recruit as claimed by the opposite parties. Section 13 of the Army Act, 1950 prescribes procedures before enrolling officer. Section 14 provides for mode of enrolment which contemplates that if after complying … Army Act as may be prescribed by the Central Government, shall have to be attested in terms of Section 16 of the Act. Section 17 prescribes the mode of attestation. Under Sub-Section (1) of Section 17, when a

Anil Nanasaheb Pawar Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 16, 39 and 71; Constitution of India - Article 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Army Pension Regulation, 1961 - Regulations 16 and 113

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR433

the fact that he had been absent without sufficient cause he was charge-sheeted under section 39(b) of the Army Act, 1950. The charge was to the effect that ' at Misamari while granted annual leave w.e.f. 10th November 1988 … of law. The only provision of law pointed out to us by Counsel on either side is section 16(a) [sic Regulation 16(a)] of the Pension Regulations, 1961 (for the Army). It is found from the records that

Chief of Air Staff Vs. Augustian

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Section 16; ;Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 13 and 15(2); ;Air Force Rules, 1961 - Rule 15; ;Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 158, 173 and 173A; ;Air Force Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulation 153

Reported in : 2010(2)KLT514

discharge of personnel for the causes specified therein. As per Rule 15, persons enrolled under the Air Force Act, 1950 who are attested in terms of Section 16 of the Act may be discharged at their own request … 4482 of 2002 and the sole respondent is the petitioner therein. The respondent entered service in the Indian Army as a Vehicle Mechanic on 9.9.1983. He was discharged from the Indian Army on 31.7.1999 after he was

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … respondents on extraneous reasons which cannot be sustained in law. They were all working at one time in 168 Infantry Brigade deployed in the place called Samba, in a border area.2. Each of the appellants and each

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

regard to enrolment of women in JAG course is ‘gender-neutral’ or ‘gender-specific’.Headnotes† Constitution of India - Arts.14, 15, 16, 33 - Army Act, 1950 - s.12 - A notification u/s.12 of the Army Act, 1950 was issued … by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except

Ajai Kumar Roy Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 101; Borders Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 40; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3999

permission to meet the detenu, but he was not allowed to see him. Under Section 101(1) of the Army Act, 1950 ('the Act' for brevity) it is the duty of the officer taking a person into military custody to … 1) Any person charged with,-- i) an offence under Section 14, or Clause (a) or Clause (b) of Section 16, or Section 17 or Section 20 or Sub-section (1) of Section 21;ii) a civil offence punishable with death

Tarif Singh Shanti Saroop Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary, M ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 10, 18 and 22; Army Rules - Rule 16

Reported in : AIR1971Delhi233

the release to the date on which they may be again posted back in the Army.9. Under the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the President has the power to grant, to such person as he … a junior commissioned officer, or to appoint any persons as a warrant officer to the Regular Army (vide Section 10), Chapter Iv of the Act, in which are included Section 18 to 24. deals with conditions of … Bir Anand and Jagmohan Lal Sabharwal respectively and were filed on May 16, 1966 and August 2, 1968.2. On October 26th, 1962, the President of

Ex. Major R.S. Budhwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Rules, 1959 - Rules 22 to 25 and 37; Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 58(1995)DLT339; 1995(34)DRJ426

was a prima facie case against these three accused persons which ought to be proceeded with under the Army Act, 1950 and that they be tried by a General Court-Martial. Signed at Dinjan this Fourth day of January, 1989.Place: … Mehtab Singh formerly JC 66136K Sub Maj Mehtab Singhof 8 JAT, and liable to trial by Court-martial under Section 123 of theArmy Act, and3. JC 127909 X Sub Kartar Singh of 8 JAT, all attached to 237 … Jaspal Singh was the Second-in-Command of the above said Regiment. On June 16,1987, at about 12.50 hours two jawans of 'A' Company 8 JAT Regiment,

M.M. Malhotra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act 1950 - Sections 19, 45 and 191(2); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 45, 46 and 191(5); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3) and 16; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16 and 16(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 1 to 4, 14 and 16(4); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2006SC80; 2006(1)BomCR661; [2005(107)FLR1006]; JT2005(9)SC506; 2006(1)MhLj1; 2006MPLJ1(SC); 2005(8)SCALE202; (2005)8SCC351; 2006(1)SLJ303(SC)

the action was taken by departmental proceedings. This Court had occasion to consider an identical provision in the Army Act 1950 (in short 'Army Act') and Army Rules, 1954 (in short 'Army Rules'). Constitutional validity of Rule 14 of … such a formal declaration from a court in a proceeding specifically commenced for the purpose. The provisions of Section 16, which is quoted below, also throw light on this aspect :16. Legitimacy of children of void and voidable

Tham Bahadur Gaurang and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1984)1GLR429

pressed into service. Now they are charged for committing the offences under Sections 37(b) & 40(a) of the Army Act, 1950. Section 37 reads as under:37. Mutiny - Any person subject to this Act who commits any of the following … an inquiry was started against 12 persons and ultimately charge-sheet Annexure 'A' was submitted against 12 persons on 16-8-80. It appears that they were charged that after having heard a seditious speech by JC50727 Sub-Bhim Bahadur Rana,