Advanced Search Results

Union of India and Another Vs. Major K.K. Taneja

Court : Delhi

Subject : LimitationService

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 41, Rule 27; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69, 153, 154, 160(1) and 164

Reported in : ILR1991Delhi215

Major. While working in that capacity, he was charged for an offence under Sec corporation 69 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the allegation that on 7th May, 1976, at about 23.00 hrs., … appeal. The appellants also moved another application (CM 157 / 88) under or. XXXXI, Rule 27 read with Section 151, C.P.C. for permission to place on record the relevant Gazette notification/ warrant by way of additional evidence. 3.

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

be tried by Court-martial :- (1) The Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and, the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of … read out to him. He was then cautioned in terms of Regulation 151 of Regulations, Navy, Part II. This was on 12-6-1992. Thereafter on 15-6-1992, … Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and the Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of

Union of India and anr. Vs. K.K. Taneja

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 43(1991)DLT227

working as acting Major. While working in that capacity, he was charged for an offences 69 of the Army Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the allegation that on 7/05/1976, at about 2300 hrs, he used … days in filing the appeal. The appellants also moved another (CM 157/88) underOrder 41 Rule 27 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code for permission to place on record the relevant Gazette notification/warrant by way of additionalevidence.(3) Before

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct

Union of India and ors. Vs. Naresh Chandra Nath

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 123(1) and 164(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Air Force Act; Navy Act

on 31.12.1985. Since 31.12.1985 happened to be the date of retirement of the respondent, Section 123(1) of the Army Act, 1950 was invoked. In the trail, besides exhibiting a large number of documents, as many as 11 witnesses were … said M/s Ideal Trading Corporation, Guwahati. Place : C/o 99 APO                                                                                                                                          (D.Bardoloi) Dated: 22 Dec 85.                                                                                                                                                    Brig.Commanding 151 Base Hospital.' 5. The trial commenced before the General Court Martial (GCM in short) on 31.12.1985. Since 31.12.1985

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Narinder Singh Mehta (Brigadier)

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 63 and 164; ;Common Law Procedure Act; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir - Section 103; ;Army Rules - Rule 22; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 20 - Order 11, Rule 1

Reported in : 1997CriLJ719

charge sheet was served on him on 9-1-1994 for allegedly having committed offences Bunder Section 63 of the Army Act, 1950, hereinafter .referred to as 'the Act' and he was eventually convicted and sentenced by the GCM to (a) … the violation of Duty complained of (as per Fitzgerald J.) in Macken v. Ellis, Ir Rep 8 CL 151.15. Therefore in the light of the foregoing, it is undoubtedly made clear that even a part of a

income-tax Officer Vs. Rajan Mathur.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)60TTJ(Del)264

1989-90 Income Tax Act 1961 s.4 - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual

Lt Col Hardeep Sandhu Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

R. Jayaprasad Vs Union of India and Ors., wherein the Hon‟ble High Court of Delhi observed as under:- “Army Act, 1950- Section 27- Defence Services- Premature Retirement- Refusal on ground of foreign service liability- Fallacious, unsustainable and quashed- Assignment given … extreme compassionate grounds- Error in treating specific instances as exhaustive- Matter remanded for consideration.” (iii) He also cited 151(2008) DLT 435(DB) in the matter of Colonel R. Jayaprasad Vs Union of India and Ors., wherein the Hon‟ble

Rajesh Kumar Vs. Manoj Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ353

sell--Can withdraw balance money from Court. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … shall dispose of is No. 7076/96 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 and is No. 4916/97 under Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff. The first application is for ad interim injunction and the second for release

V and S VIn Spirit Ab Vs. Kullu Valley Mineral Water Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : 116(2005)DLT97; 2005(30)PTC47(Del)

mark ABSOLUTE on or before 31.03.2005. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … No. 6325/04 1. This application filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(in short the `CPC') seeks interim relief restraining the defendant from using