Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: army act 1950 section 15 · Page 1 of about 1,094 results (0.026 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 29 1968

Harcharan Singh Premi Vs. the Officer Commanding Army, Military Hospit ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-1968

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 15

Reported in : AIR1970Mad176

a review petition to the Director General, Armed Forces Medical Service on 7-3-1967 under Section 27 of the Army Act, 1950, and as the petitioner did not receive any immediate redress on his application for review, he submitted a … the Rules framed or Regulations made under the Act. The rule-making power is under Section 191(1)(a). 5. Rule 15 of the Army Rules, 1954, prescribes the procedure for termination of service by the Central Government on grounds

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2016

Indian Defence Service of Engineers Association (Govt. Approved) Vs. U ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

of rules- i.e. the Military Engineer Services (Army Personnel), Regulations, 1989 hereafter ("the 1989 Regulations") framed under the Army Act, 1950 and notification bearing no. SRO. 4E dated 09.07.1991 ("the 1991 Rules") framed under proviso to Article 309 of … them. 4. In these circumstances, urge the petitioners, the 1989 regulations were framed and brought into force under Section 192 of the Army Act. It is submitted that these regulations did not in any manner seek to … on 04.12.1923. By a notification of 24.06.1948, which was made effective from 15.08.1947, a revision of the established cadre of MES was ordered. This was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2001

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

powers of MG ASC, HQ Southern Command. 10. We notice the relevant provisions of the Acts and Regulations:-The Army Act 1950 '71. Punishments awardable by courts-martial.- Punishments may be inflicted in respect of offences committed by persons subject to … he was tried by General Court Martial on certain charges and was dismissed from service on 13.6.1988 under Section 71 of the Army At. He submitted papers for payment of pension stating that he had qualifying service. … on 26.2.1990. He was given a show-cause notice on 21.6.1991 under Regulation 15(2) on the Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 as to why his pensionary benefits

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 29 2010

N. Sivasubramanian Versus Government of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Jun-29-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

that General Court Martial could not be conducted since the same is barred under Section 122 of the Army Act, 1950. The delay would vitiate proceedings. The petitioner would place his reliance on the following dictums: i) AIR 1990 … the petition, the petitioner would contend that he commissioned as Platoon Commander in the Corps of Engineers on 15.06.1969 and he had put in 23 years of unblemished record of service. But he was dismissed on 25.01.1993

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1983

Tham Bahadur Gaurang and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-10-1983

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1984)1GLR429

pressed into service. Now they are charged for committing the offences under Sections 37(b) & 40(a) of the Army Act, 1950. Section 37 reads as under:37. Mutiny - Any person subject to this Act who commits any of the following … the case of S.P.N. Sharma. v. Union of India and Anr. reported in A.I.R. 1968 Delhi at page 156.Constitution of India, Articles 226 and 227- Habas corpus-Principles applicable to persons tried and convicted by Court-Martial - Writ

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2004

Daya Shankar Tiwari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-17-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 311(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 105 and 106; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 13, 13(2), 13(3), 13(5) and 17; Army Pension Regulation, 1961 - Regulation 132; Army Regulations, 1987

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC255

copy of that letter was also sent to the wife of the petitioner under Section 105 of the Army Act, 1950. Section 105 of the Army Act is quoted below :'105. Capture of deserters--(1) Whenever any person subject to this … medical re-categorisation of the petitioner were initiated. He was sent to the Classified Specialist Surgeon and Orthopedic on 15.7.1987 for his opinion who opined as under :'Summary and opinion of Lt. Col. Ashok Kumar and classifiedSpecialist Surgeon

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2014

Union of India and Another Vs. Surinder Kumar and Another

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Apr-09-2014

Subject : Criminal

by the SGCM. 14. Section 3(i), (ii) and (x), section 9 with comments and section 108 of the Army Act 1950 are taken note of : 3(i) Active service, as applied to a person subject to this Act, means … :- (a) general courts-martial ; (b) district courts-martial ; (c) summary general courts-martial ; and (d) summary courts-martial. 15. Respondents, in view of the aforementioned provisions of the Army Act, were on active service and they have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2012

Captian Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Jandk;

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : May-23-2012

Subject : Education

has made an attempt to give this case a different complexion in terms of Section 122 of the Army Act, 1950 wherein the maximum period prescribed in giving the consent by the authority is three years stating that in … any illegality in the process adopted by the Committal Court so as to hold the entire trial bad 15 ab initio or to say that the trial needs to be stopped and abandoned.27. We have also examined

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2006

Kuldip Nayar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-22-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 13D, 14 to 24 and 30; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(2), 4, 5, 6, 16, 29A to 29C, 59, 62(4), 64(4), 93, 94, 95, 100(1), 128 and 128(1) - Schedule - Articles 171 and 173; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 3; Constitution of India (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956; Army Act, 1950; Government of India Act, 1915; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1919; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935; Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 28; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act - Sections 15; Constitution of India (Thirty Sixth Amendment) Act, 1975; Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987; Constitution of India (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1951; Constitution o

Reported in : AIR2006SC3127; JT2006(8)SC1; 2006(8)SCALE257; (2006)7SCC1

the armed forces of the Union; orbeing a member of a force to which the provisions of the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), have been made applicable whether with or without modifications; orbeing a member of an armed … by the State Government by notification in the official Gazette, pursuant to the power conferred upon it by Section 15 of the Act. A Statutory rule, while ever subordinate to the parent statute, is otherwise, to be treated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2007

Udai Singh Dagar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-15-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Veterinary Council Act, 1984 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 15, 22, 23, 23(1), 25, 30 and 67; Trade Unions Act; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Bombay Veterinary Practitioners Act, 1953 - Sections 14, 19, 24 and 25; Indian Army Act, 1911; Army Act, 1950; Maharashtra Veterinary Practitioners Act, 1971 - Sections 18, 18(1), 18(2), 23, 26, 33, 37, 38 and 38(1); Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samities Act, 1961 - Sections 100(1); East Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1949; Pepsu Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 2008 BK; Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1963; Drugs Act; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Pharmacy Act; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR2007SC2599; 2007(6)ALLMR(SC)447; 2007(2)BLJR2218; JT2007(7)SC127; 2007(7)SCALE278; (2007)10SCC306

law has been convicted under the Army Act or under the Indian Army Act, 1911 or under the Army Act, 1950, of an offence which is also a cognizable offence as so defined and any person who after due … Practitioners Act, 1971 (for short 'the 1971 Act'). The said Act came into force from 15th November, 1971. Section 15 of the 1971 Act mandates the State to cause a register to be prepared for veterinary practitioners of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial