Advanced Search Results

Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India (UOi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 245, 246, 248, 254, 257A, 352, 355 and 356; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 1(2), 130, 131, 144 and 197; Arms Act, 1959; Army Act, 1950; Assam Disturbed Areas Act; Armed Forces (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Armed Forces (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6;

Reported in : AIR1998SC465; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)220; JT1997(9)SC431; 1997(7)SCALE741; (1998)2SCC109; [1997]Supp5SCR469; AIR 1998 SC 431

substance in the complaint, suitable action has been taken against the person concerned under the provisions of the Army Act. The learned Attorney General has placed before us instructions in the form of a list of 'Do's and … punishable under Sections 41, 42(e), 63 and 64(f) of the Army Act, 1950.61. In State of Uttar Pradesh v. Chandra Mohan Nigam and Ors. : … in the sense that an order prohibiting the assembly of five or more persons can be issued under Section 144 Cr.P.C., while an order prohibiting the carrying of weapons or of things capable of being used as weapons

R.S. Bhagat Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi191; ILR1980Delhi1422; 1981LabIC617; 1981(1)SLJ71(Delhi)

the defense Minister, who is the highest authority has been disregarded and the petitioner had been dismissed. Under section 144 of the Army Act 1950 the Court Martial can consider the 'general character' of the accused and 'other … and that the law would take its own course in the circumstances. (iii) Under section 164(2) of the Army Act, 1950, the Central Government have a power to revise the order of the Court Martial and to pass such

Thimmanna Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 39, 71, 116, 120(4), 120(5) and 144; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(1)KarLJ51

could not be said to be disproportionate to the charge or tainted with illegality as contemplated under the Army Act. 6. As I see, para 14 of the said judgment, the Court had observed as hereunder: '14. Chapter … hereunder: '14. Chapter 6 of the Army Act specifies the offences and also the punishments for such offences. Section 39(a) specifies that to be absent without leave constitutes an offence and Section 71(e) of the said Act

income Tax Officer Vs. Ashok Suri.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)58TTJ(Del)162

1981-82 Income Tax Act 1961 s.68 - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … by the assessed after he became its proprietor were also not disputed in the original assessment made under section 144 or 143(3). The assessee had submitted confirmation in respect of all the disputed items of cash credits before

Priyanka Gogna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 141, 144 and 226

Reported in : 109(2004)DLT456

for admission - impugned Order valid. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … prescribed by the Medical Council of India.8. Mr. Maninder Singh has drawn my attention to Articles 141 and 144 of the Constitution for his submission that neither equitable considerations nor principles of estoppel would be attracted in

Gadore Tools Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 35-B and 256; Finance Act, 1990

Reported in : (2000)161CTR(Del)472

256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … items to various parts of the world. The accounting year was from 1.7.1973 to 30.6.1974. Related assessment under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was framed on 30.3.1978. The assessed preferred appeal, which was decided by

Santa Singh Gopal Singh and ors. Vs. Rajinder Singh Bur Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1925 - Sections 7 and 11; Indian Limitation Act, 1980 - Sections 4 to 25 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144; Specific Relief Act; Administration of Evacuee Property Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 10 and 80 - Order 21, Rule 63 - Order 41 Rule 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 144

Reported in : AIR1965P& H415

stayed under the Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1925 because Mohinder Singh and Rajinder Singh were serving in the Army and it was not revived till 1946. It appears that at the time of the partition of the … still pending was disposed of by the trial Court on 28th February 1950. It was held that the property was self-acquired of 1965 Punj. D. … being out of possession. He asserted ownership of the suit land and claimed that he was in possession. Section 144, Criminal P.C. proceedings seemed to have cast a doubt on his title and he accordingly brought a suit

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that “a militant or terrorist or insurgent, is an ‘Enemy’ within the aforesaid definition [Section 3(x) of the Army Act, 1950]. and it is the bounden duty of all Army Personnel to act against a militant or a terrorist … the State of Manipur to place before us the declarations under AFSPA and the prohibitory orders issued under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C. only fairly recent declarations and prohibitory orders were produced, the rest having perhaps been lost

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct

Mehar Singh Manhas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(2)ShimLC212

sent to perform his duties with 53 Infantry Brigade. The petitioner was charged under Section 41(1) of the Army Act, 1950 for the alleged misconduct as reproduced below:He at field, on 1 June, 98, when ordered by IC-41475Y Maj … also Wade & Forsyth; 'Administrative Law'; (2005); p.366].In Halsbury's Laws of England, (4th edn.); Reissue, Vol. 1(1); pp. 144-45; para 78, it is stated:The Court will quash exercise of discretionary powers in which there is no reasonable