Advanced Search Results

Union of India Vs. Diwan Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 140

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)566; 1996(39)DRJ820

was also not accepted by the Trial Court. The Trial court drew presumption against the. respondents herein under Section 140 and 142 of the Army Act and held that the Form of Discharge was signed by the respondents … imprisonment cannot be appreciated nor tenable because such threat was contrary to Section 64(f) and 69 of the Army Act,1950. Under those provisions for such an offence punishment could not have been more than seven years. Hence, there

Gurman Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1984CriLJ718

assembly of the court of enquiry is in the nature of review which is not authorised by the Army Act, 1950 or the rules framed thereunder and as such the convening of the Court of Inquiry for the second … which was received on 18th January, 1983 is also bad inasmuch as it has been contended that under Section 140 (C) of the Railways Act forwarding of claim by sending it by registered post has to be treated

Satish Vs. The Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

cannot be faulted with as the same is in accordance with the provision of Section 22 of the Army Act, 1950 read with Rule 13(3) of the Army Rules, 1954. As the discharge of the petitioner was on recommendation … [b] Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others V/s Damodaran A.V. (Dead) through L.Rs. and others (2009) 9 SCC 140 and [c] Controller of Defence Accounts V/s S. Balachandran Nair (AIR 2005 SC 4391) and contended that for

Nirmal Lakra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 15, 16, 40, 45, 47, 63, 70, 75, 83, 87, 115, 120, 121, 153 and 164(2); Evidence Act - Sections 3, 4 and 87; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 22, 25, 45, 47, 62, 63, 64, 134, 135, 138, 139, 140, 142, 143 to 145, 147, 148, 149, 153 and 161(1); Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(2), 21, 33, 121, 226 and 227; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 121 and 162; Court Martial (Appeals) Act, 1951; Court Martial (Appeals) (Amendment) Act, 1968; Uniform Code of Military justice Act, 1950; Administration of Justice Act, 1968; Military Justice Act, 1968; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 480 and 482

Reported in : 2003(1)SLJ151(Delhi)

Ors., The learned counsel has drawn our attention to the fact that Sections 162 and 121 of the Army Act, 1950 are in pari material with Sections 115 and 75 of the BSF Act.8. It was further submitted that … BSF Rules, an accused is entitled to object to any charge. Rules 140 thereof provides for amendment of charge. Rule 142 specifies the procedures when … the same had not been made part of the proceedings.The learned counsel would contend that in terms of Section 87 of the BSF Act, the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act would apply and in that view

Balvinder Singh Sodhi Vs. Mahender Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7; Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 14U

Reported in : 70(1997)DLT472

of Section 140 of the Act - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual

C.B.i. Vs. Dharampal Singh and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 140; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 160 and 197; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 201, 302, 304, 307, 323, 330, 342 and 365

Reported in : 123(2005)DLT592; 2005(84)DRJ284

with the duties -- Conviction affirmed. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … sanction to prosecute the petitioner was not in order. The learned Additional Sessions Judge held that sanction under Section 140 of the Delhi Police Act was mandatory and that the same having not been taken would be a

State Vs. Shiv Charan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 401; Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 140

Reported in : 1998CriLJ2776; 76(1998)DLT873; 1998(45)DRJ289; 1998RLR324

of application of provision left open. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … found a case against the respondent Shiv Charan under Section 218 IPC. According to the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Section 140 of the Delhi Police Act puts a bar to the suits and prosecution against the Police officers. According

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that “a militant or terrorist or insurgent, is an ‘Enemy’ within the aforesaid definition [Section 3(x) of the Army Act, 1950]. and it is the bounden duty of all Army Personnel to act against a militant or a terrorist

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

case, the court was concerned with an interpretation of the expression “trial commenced” under Section 123(2) of the Army Act, 1950. Charges for dereliction of duty were laid against the respondent and action against the Army Act was initiated … R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate (SPP) with Mr. D.P. Singh, Ms. Tarannum Crl.A.Nos.715/2013, 753/2013 & 1099/2013 Page 1 of 140 Cheema, Ms. Hiral Gupta, Mr. Manu Mishra, Mr. Harinder Bains, Advocates for CBI. Mr. H.S. Phoolka Senior Advocate