Advanced Search Results

Ex. Major R.S. Budhwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Rules, 1959 - Rules 22 to 25 and 37; Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 58(1995)DLT339; 1995(34)DRJ426

was a prima facie case against these three accused persons which ought to be proceeded with under the Army Act, 1950 and that they be tried by a General Court-Martial. Signed at Dinjan this Fourth day of January, 1989.Place: … of co-accused under Section 30 of Evidence Act nor testimony of the accomplice under Section 133 read with Section 114(b) of the Evidence Act. They are ordinary witnesses because they have already been convicted and sentenced at the

Sukhdev Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965 - Rule 2; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4(1), 63, 73, 81(4), 113, 114 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 33 and 352

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR951]; 2000(7)SCALE259; (2000)8SCC492; [2000]Supp4SCR292; (2001)1UPLBEC664

Court considered the nature of the service in the G.R.E.F. and the applicability of certain provisions of the Army Act, 1950 for the purpose of taking disciplinary action against the Officers of the G.R.E.F. In that judgment this Court … Notification relates to certain amendments in Sections 3, 63, 73, 81(4), 113, 114 and 116(1) of the said Act. In the above judgment, this Court … the G.R.E.F. on 8-11-1966 and was discharged sometime before 24-11-1972. He joined the Punjab Agriculture University as a Section Officer and on 7-9-1973, in the Municipal Committee, Ludhiana. In the year 1976 the services of the employees

N. Ranga Rao Vs. Government of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 10, 18, 19, 22, 191 and 192; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 49 and 75; Constitution of India - Articles 33, 53, 53(1), 73, 73(1), 74, 74(1), 75, 77(1), 77(3), 161(1), 161(2), 162, 166(3), 226 and 309; Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Produce and Livestock and Markets Act, 1966; Defence Service Regulations, 1962 - Regulation 103; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 16-A, 16-B, 16B(1) and 16B(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : (1986)IILLJ1AP

The appointing authority of the appellant is the President of India by operation of S. 10 of the Army Act 1950 (46 of 1950), for short, 'The Act'. Therefore, we hold that executive action of the Union of India … latent was made patent by Office Order No. 51 dated 16th August, 1984 but its result is inconsequential. Section 114(c) of the Evidence Act permits to draw presumptive evidence that official acts have been regularly performed. In

Roop Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 1, 2, 3(24), 21, 33, 34, 38(1), 39, 40, 63, 69, 70, 71, 72, 80, 108, 109, 110, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120, 120(2), 120(4), 120(5), 125, 161, 193; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341 and 376; Army Rules, 1954 - 22(3), 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 106, 107, 108, 109, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120, 129, 137 and 149

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj3323

proceeding. They also seek to challenge the validity of the provisions relating to summary court martial under the Army Act, 1950 and the Army Rules, 1954. As vires has been challenged in all the petitions, they were heard together.2. … of any corps, department or detachment of the regular Army. Sections 113, 114 and 115 lay down the composition of the general Court-martial respectively. In … was tried by summary court martial for committing an act prejudicial to good order and military discipline under Section 63 of the Army Act. Before being subjected to court-martial, summary of evidence was recorded in presence of

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. S.P.S. Rajkumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 161(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 40; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 46, 103 and 104

Reported in : JT2007(6)SC278; 2007(6)SCALE124; (2007)6SCC407

Union of India and Anr. v. Charanjit S. Gill and Ors. : AIR2000SC3425 interpreted certain provisions of the Army Act, 1950 (in short the 'Act') and the Army Rules, 1954 (in short the 'Army Rules') holding that the Judge … of GCM - Order of HC set aside - Appeal allowed - AIR FORCE ACT, 1950.[C.A. No. 45/1950]. Section 114: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ] Composition of General Court Martial (GCM) Eligibility of a member

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … Union of India shall allocate not less than 50% of the vacancies to women candidates. [Paras 88-90, 92, 114]Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16 - Army Act, 1950 - s.12 - Whether Present Recruitment Policy

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

settled.90. In AIR1999SC3833: (1999) 8 SCC375UOI vs. Sadha Singh, the respondent was convicted under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 for the offence of murder. The court observed that the Army Act was a special Act which provided … a minor is punishable even more stringently under Section 370(4). Mandatory sentence of rigorous Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 114 imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years but which may extend to imprisonment for life

Major R.S. Budhwar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act - Sections 69 and 164; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109 and 302

Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)213; AIR1996SC2000; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)226; 1996CriLJ2862; 1996(2)Crimes154(SC); JT1996(5)SC39; 1996(4)SCALE269; (1996)9SCC502; [1996]Supp2SCR528

of imprisonment for life and cashiering. Aggrieved thereby the appellant presented a petition under Section 164(1) of the Army Act, 1950 ('Act' for short) wherein he prayed that the findings and sentences recorded against him be not confirmed. The … explained to the GCM the value of the evidence of an accomplice with reference to Section 133 and Section 114 (Illustration b) of the Evidence Act. If inspite of such explanation the GCM found the appellant guilty it

Syndicate Bank Vs. Begum International and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : BankingCommercial

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 85 and 114

Reported in : 72(1998)DLT168

meant common experience of the judges - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual … Attorney Ex.PW2/1 was executed before a Notary Public. The question is whether any presumption can be raised under Section 114 of the Evidence Act that this Power of Attorney would have been executed by the two Directors only