Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: army act 1950 section 11 · Page 1 of about 1,299 results (0.031 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 04 2000

Hav. Ved Prakash Sangwan Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-04-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20 and 23; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 11, 12 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)749

AND ITEM OF TABLE IN RULE 17 OF ARMY RULES 1954 READ WITH ARMY ACT SECTION 20(3) OF ARMY ACT, 1950. 1. 'Dismissed from service w.e.f. 16 July, 1991 being convicted by Hon'ble Court of Addl Sessions Judge, Bhiwani(Haryana) … 1962 (Revised Edition 1967). 3. Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.' 5. The Supreme Court, by order dated 11.4.1994, released the petitioner on probation under Section 360 Cr.P.C. maintaining the conviction of the petitioner under Section 323

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2002

Colonel Aniltej Singh Dhaliwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 2 ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-22-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(2), 71, 153 and 163; Army Rules; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A

Reported in : 2002(64)DRJ854

appropriate orders on the question of sentence in exercise of the powers vested under Section 163 of the Army Act, 1950, after modifying the Court's previous order dated 10.5.1999. This application was vehemently opposed by the Petitioner herein in … The appellants wrote a letter dated October 21, 1999 requiring the respondent to attend the proceedings on November 11, 1999. In response thereto, the respondent wrote a letter to the appellants on november 03, 1999, copy whereof

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 1954

In Re: Mr. 'G', A Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-27-1954

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bar Councils Act - Sections 11(1); Constitution of India - Article 32; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 45

Reported in : 1954(2)BLJR477; (1954)56BOMLR1220; [1955]1SCR490

a gentleman.' In the Army it is a military offence to do otherwise (see section 45 of the Army Act, 1950) though no notice would be taken of ungentlemanly conduct under the ordinary law of the land, and none … the matter was referred to the Bombay Bar Council and was investigated by three of its members under section 11(1) of the Bar Councils Act. They recorded their opinion that this amounted to professional misconduct. The High Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2010

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Criminal

2 provides that the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, … Section 10 deals with salaries, allowances and other terms and conditions of service of Chairperson and other members. Section 11 deals with prohibitions as to holding of offices etc. by Chairperson or member on ceasing to be such

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1999

B.R. Mouli Vs. Commanding Officer, Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-08-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 80, 83, 84, 85 and 121; Army Rules - Rule 34

Reported in : 1999(5)ALD352

respondent dated 11-3-1999 (Charge Sheet to be tried by General Court Martial) as being in violation of the Army Act, 1950, Section 121 ofArmy Rules 34, Regulations for the ArmyPara 903 exceeding jurisdiction, unlawful and ultra vires.2. Interim stay was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 1983

R. Viswan and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-1983

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(4), 21 and 63; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 19 to 21

Reported in : AIR1983SC658; 1983(2)Crimes392(SC); (1983)IILLJ157SC; 1983(1)SCALE497; (1983)3SCC401; [1983]3SCR60

relating to the interpretation of Article 33 of the Constitution. The question is whether Section 21 of the Army Act 1950 read with Chapter IV of the Army Rules 1954 is within the scope and ambit of Article 33 … in over all control of GREF was originally created as part of Army Headquarters and it was only 11 later, for reasons of high policy, that it was separated from Army Headquarters and placed under the Border

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2004

Radhey Shyam Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-10-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 2K, 4K, 10, 10(1), and 12(5); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 142, 226 and 227; Army Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Payment of Gratuity Act; Foreman and Accountant Cadre Employees Service Rules

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC188; (2005)2UPLBEC1181

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person--(i) Who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 ; or(ii) Who is employed in the police service or as an … the dispute has resulted in depriving the petitioner of his legitimate right of review of his case under Section 11 of the Industrial Disputes Act (Central), 1947 as well as equivalent provisions of the Act, as such, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

neighbourly relations.' 35. The argument before the learned Single Judge was that order under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 had been passed without any justifiable reasons and it is an order of dismissal on account of misconduct … Evidence on 30.10.1979:PW1 IC 23440 H. Capt. A.K: Rana is now made available on 30 October, 1979 at 11.30 Hrs. In 205 Div. Loc Bty. Location C/o 56 RPO for cross examination by IC 18803 Major R.K.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2001

Union of India and ors. Vs. Harjeet Singh Sandhu Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-11-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 34 to 68, 45, 69, 70, 71, 74, 101, 109, 117, 121, 122, 123, 125, 127, 153, 158, 160, 164, 165 and 191; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14 and 71; Constitution of India - Artilce 33, 310 and 311

Reported in : AIR2001SC1772; JT2001(4)SC597; 2001LabIC1707; 2001(3)SCALE336; (2001)5SCC593; [2001]2SCR1127; 2001(2)SCT1018(SC); 2002(1)SLJ1(SC); (2001)2UPLBEC1397

result whereof Bhagwan Das died. A General Court martial (GCM, for short) was convened under Section 109 of Army Act, 1950 which tried the respondent and the other officers. On 26.12.1978 the GCM awarded the sentence of forfeiture of … The contention advanced on behalf of the officer was, in the view of the court, 'indefensible'. Vide paras 11 and 12, this court held that the misconduct and other attending circumstances relating thereto have to be the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2000

Sukhdev Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965 - Rule 2; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4(1), 63, 73, 81(4), 113, 114 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 33 and 352

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR951]; 2000(7)SCALE259; (2000)8SCC492; [2000]Supp4SCR292; (2001)1UPLBEC664

Court considered the nature of the service in the G.R.E.F. and the applicability of certain provisions of the Army Act, 1950 for the purpose of taking disciplinary action against the Officers of the G.R.E.F. In that judgment this Court … the G.R.E.F. on 8-11-1966 and was discharged sometime before 24-11-1972. He joined the Punjab Agriculture University as a Section Officer and on 7-9-1973, in the Municipal Committee, Ludhiana. In the year 1976 the services of the employees

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial