Advanced Search Results

The State Vs. Lenbom Lonkholam Simte and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

6 respondents therein, who were accused Nos. 1 to j and 7 Under Section 19 of the Indian Arms Act.2. The case arose under the following circumstances:There were communal riots in some villages in Churachandpur sub-division between Kukis … the said Magistrate against the 6 respondents therein, who were accused Nos. 1 to j and 7 Under Section 19 of the Indian Arms Act.2. The case arose under the following circumstances:There were communal riots in some

Mehar Chand Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 19, 29 and 32

Reported in : AIR1959All660; 1959CriLJ1253

2. The applicant Meharchand was convicted by the Railway Magistrate of Saharanpur under Section 19(f) of the Indian Arms Act and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. It was found against him that on 26-1-1956 … XXVIII of 1857 had been issued and was still in operation. By a notification No. 5336 dated 21-12-1858 Sections 1, 2 and 5 of Act XXVIII of 1857 had been extended to the whole of the then

Sarju Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 19; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24; Arms (Amendment) Act, 1959 - Sections 1(3) and 46(2)

Reported in : AIR1964All6; 1964CriLJ23

Seasions Judge, Sitapur dismissing the appeal of Sarju against his conviction under Section 19 (f) of the Indian Arms Act (Act 11 of 1878) and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 13 months.2. The only point argued before me … Section 19(f) were not saved by the saving Section 46(2) of the Arms Act, 54 of 1959 or Sections 6 and 24 of the General Clauses Act. Another objection was raised in paragraph 4 of the application

Ahmed HosseIn Vs. the Queen-empress

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1900)ILR27Cal692

committed to the Sessions Court at Bhagulpore, and convicted on the 3rd January last of an offence under Sections 19 and 20 of the Arms Act of 1878, and sentenced to six weeks' rigorous imprisonment and a fine … premises. The articles so found must be taken to be arms and ammunition, within the meaning of the Arms Act, XI of 1878, and they must be taken to have been in the possession of the prisoner within

Dhanpat Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 19, 29 and 32; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 56 and 57(7)

Reported in : AIR1960All40

prosecution failed to prove any valid sanction for the prosecution of the appellant under Section 19(f) of the Arms Act and so the appellant could not have been convicted under Section 19(f) of the Arms Act. He also … to eighteen months' rigorous imprisonment by the Additional Sessions Judge Barabanki. He and two others were prosecuted under Sections 399 and 402 I.P. C., but all the accused were acquitted on that charge.2. Dhanpat came up in

Sughar Singh Vs. Rex

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1950All277

Raghubar Dayal, J. 1. This is a revision by Sughar Singh against his conviction under Section 19(f), Arms Act, by a Magistrate, first class, Mainpuri, the appeal against the conviction having been dismissed by the Sessions Judge.2. … be said to control it or have it under his control. It must be remembered that under these sections of the Explosive Substances Act and Arms Act, mere possession of incriminating articles constitutes serious criminal offences and

Kamta Prasad Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 19; Excise Act - Sections 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 411

Reported in : AIR1961All438; 1961CriLJ176

ORDERM.C. Desai, J. 1. The applicant challenges his conviction under Section 19(f), Arms Act. He is a blacksmith and is a member of a joint Hindu family consisting of himself and his … ORDERM.C. Desai, J. 1. The applicant challenges his conviction under Section 19(f), Arms Act. He is a blacksmith and is a member of a joint Hindu family consisting of

State Vs. Santappa Mother Kasawwa Metri

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1956Bom217; 1956CriLJ487

learned Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mudhol, with having committed an offence under Section 19(f), Indian Arms Act. The learned trial Magistrate acquitted the accused. Against that order of acquittal the State of Bombay has preferred … charged before the learned Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mudhol, with having committed an offence under Section 19(f), Indian Arms Act. The learned trial Magistrate acquitted the accused. Against that order of acquittal the State

Sarnam Singh and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 22; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 403(1); Arms Act - Sections 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395

Reported in : AIR1961All196; 1961CriLJ454

this allegation.6. It has been proved that Sarnam Singh appellant had been prosecuted under Section 19(f) of the Arms Act for the recovery of a gun from his possession on the 2nd of August 1957. He was, however, … Their bail bonds are discharged. Criminal - evidence of possession - Article 22 of Constitution of India and Sections 395 and 403(1) of Criminal Procedure Code,1898 - Order of acquittal in favour of accused - not held

Chhotey Lal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162; Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1954All687

Mukerji, J.1. This is an appeal by Chhotey Lal who has been convicted under Section 19(f) of the Arms Act and has been sentenced to 18 months' rigorous imprisonment.2. Chhotey Lal stood his trial before the learned Sessions … along with three other persons, Ram Bharosey Lal, Rajendra Kumar and Avadh Behari Lal for offences punishable under Sections 304/34 and Section 394, I. P. C. The facts on which the aforementioned charges were made against the