Advanced Search Results
Sanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-2013
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4
Indian Penal Code and offences under Sections 3 and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohinder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Sep-23-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 392 and 397; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27 and 39; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 6
1996VIIIAD(SC)9; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)796; 1996(4)Crimes11(SC); JT1996(8)SC519; 1996(7)SCALE95; (1996)11SCC369
in Sessions Case No. 5-TC 1987. Criminal - conviction - Sections 392 and 397 of India Penal Code, Sections 25, 27 and 39 of Arms Act, 1959 and Section 6 of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 … both Mohinder Singh and Harjinder Singh under Section 392 read with 397 IPC, and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 read with Section 6 of Terrorist & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 ('TADA') for short) and another against
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNitIn Nagpal Vs. State
Delhi
Jul-03-2006
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 154, 161(3), 164, 167, 167(2), 170, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 173(5), 190, 190(1), 193, 204, 207, 209, 226, 227, 293, 293(4), 309, 309(2), 319, 437(1), 437(2), 437(5), 439, 439(1) and 439(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 186, 302, 307, 332, 353 and 393; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27, 39, 54 and 59; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
2006(90)DRJ745
23.6.2005 at Police Station Ashok Vihar, against the accused under Sections 302/307/393/353/186/332/34 IPC and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.20.9.2005: This was the 89th day after the arrest of the petitioner. On this day, it is alleged that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Devinder Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Sep-13-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 307; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 6; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27
AIR1997SC454; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)902; 1996CriLJ4461; 1996(6)SCALE520a; [1996]Supp6SCR249
and sentenced the appellant Devinder @ Pappy under Section 302 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 read with Section 6 of Terrorist and disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 ('TADA' for short). 2. Shorn of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of M.P. Vs. Ayub Khan.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-29-2012
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Section 25(1)(a); Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 428
of explosives, without any licence. The accused was charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short ‘the Arms Act’) and was tried before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chachoda. … bullets and 50 grams of explosives, without any licence. The accused was charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short ‘the Arms Act’) and was tried before the Court of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDarshan Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Aug-30-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148 and 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 6(1)
1996VIAD(SC)410; AIR1997SC364; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)518; 1996(2)ALT(Cri)677; 1996CriLJ4438; 1996(3)Crimes225(SC); JT1996(7)SC568; 1996(6)SCALE263; (1996)10SCC283
bonds to serve out the remainder of their sentence. Criminal - murder - Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, 1959, Sections 148 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 107 and 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBijoy Das Vs. State of West Bengal
Supreme Court of India
Jan-28-2008
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
(2008)2CALLT13(SC); 2008CriLJ1808; JT2008(2)SC123; 2008(2)SCALE62; (2008)4SCC511; 2008AIRSCW1034; 2008(4)SCC511; (2008)2SCC(Cri)449; 2008CriLJ1808; 2008(1)Crimes305; 2008(2)LH(SC)922.
sheet against the present appellant both under Section 302 IPC as well as under Section 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short 'Arms Act'). The learned Sessions Judge after framing charge under Section 302 IPC as well as … High Court, upholding the conviction and sentence of the appellant who was found guilty of offence punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSangeet and anr. Vs. State of HaryanA.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-20-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 302, 149, 449; Arms Act, 1959 - Section 25(1-B); Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 235(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 - Sections 367(5), 354(3)
2012(11)SCALE140
the appellants) were accused of various offences under the Indian Penal Code (for short the IPC) and the Arms Act, 1959. They were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak by his judgment and order dated 13th November, 2009 … object). Five of the accused were convicted of an offence under Section 25(1-B) of the Arms Act, 1959. Except the appellants, all of them were … degree of punishment.With the solitary exception of Section 303, the same policy permeates Section 302 and some other sections of the Penal Code, where the maximum punishment is the death penalty.(ii)-(a) No exhaustive enumeration of aggravating or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaIn Pal and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-05-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27
AIR2004SC2158; 2004CriLJ2036; JT2004(4)SC273; 2004(4)SCALE178; (2004)10SCC692
34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short the 'Arms Act') were acquitted by the trial Court. By the impugned judgment, a Division Bench
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Waheed Khan @ Waheed and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Aug-27-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 212, 299, 300, 302, 304, 392 and 411; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1B); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Evidence Act, 1872
AIR2002SC2961; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)509; JT2002(6)SC274; (2002)7SCC175; [2002]SUPP1SCR703; 2002(2)LC1298(SC)
read with Section 34 thereof and Section 392 read with Section 34 thereof, and Section 25(1-B) of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short 'Arms Act'). The first four accused persons were charged with commission of offences punishable under Section … Courts losing sight of the true scope and meaning of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves to be drawn into minute abstractions. The safest way of approach to the interpretation and application
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »