Advanced Search Results

Sanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4

Indian Penal Code and offences under Sections 3 and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances … an intent to overawe the Government as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections of the people, i.e. Hindus and

Sanjay Dutt Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Cbi,bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Indian Penal Code and offences under Sections 3 and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances … an intent to overawe the Government as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections of the people, i.e. Hindus and

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6

persons and lifesentence and other sentences for the offences under TADA, the Indian PenalCode, 1860 (in short 'IPC') Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884.By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons andacquitted 23 … TADA') forBombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No. 1 of 1993. These appealshave been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against theirconviction and sentence and by the CBI for confirmation of … Hotel. In the abovesaid incident of serialbombings, 257 human lives were lost, 713 persons were seriously injured andproperties worth about Rs. 27 crores were destroyed.

Sheelam Ramesh and anr. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 307; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities(Prevention) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(2), 4 and 5; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 7 and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : AIR2000SC118; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)301; 2000CriLJ51; 1999(4)Crimes354(SC); JT1999(8)SC537; 1999(6)SCALE499; (1999)8SCC369; [1999]Supp3SCR589

A2 and A3 were apprehended. After investigation, charge-sheet was submitted under Sections 302, 307 read with 34 IPC, Section 7 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 3 and 4 of the TADA. The case of A1 was … @ Rajanna (A-3) were convicted under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 I.P.C., Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 3(2)(i)(ii) and 5 of the TADA.2. A2, A3 and another Bheemanna @ Bairi Ramchander (A-1) are

Sanjay Dutt Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr. Cbi, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 3, 5, 12 and 15; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3(3), 5, 6, 7, 25(1A) and 25(1B); Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 8(3) and 8(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1608; 2009(111)BomLR2116; 2009CriLJ2785; (2009)3GLR1833(SC); JT2009(4)SC614; 2009(4)SCALE369; (2009)5SCC787; 2009(4)LC2036(SC)

also for the offence under Section 3 and Section 7 read with Sections 25(1A) and 25(1B) of the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner was found guilty of offences punishable under Section 3 and Section 7 read with Sections 25(1A)

Mohamad Harshad Shaukatali and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 114, 392, 394 and 397; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3,8, 9 and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 165; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 25(1); Constitution of India - Articles 3 and 7

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)352

to undergo 7 years R.I. There was also conviction under section 3 read with section 25(1) of the Arms Act, 1959 for which he was sentenced to undergo 6 months R.I. All the substantive sentences were directed to run

Harjit Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, (TADA) 1987 - Sections 3, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 120-B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 7, 25

Reported in : (2002)10SCC695

Act, whoever acquires, has in his possession or carried any prohibited arms or prohibited ammunition in contravention of Section 7 shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than five years, but which … Section 120-B of IPC. However, he convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. The learned Judge while awarding the sentence observed that appellant Harjit Singh was not a first offender and

Kalpnath Rai Vs. State (Through Cbi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, - Sections 3(1), (2) and (3) and 15; Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) -, 1973 - Sections 2, 100(4), 313 and 465; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 52A, 136, 157 and 312; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) -, 1898 - Sections 465(2) and 537; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 4 and 25; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2(1), 3(4), 3(5), 5, 12(2) and 20A(1) and 20A(2); Evidence Act, - Sections 30 and 114

Reported in : 1997(2)ALD(Cri)805; 1998CriLJ369; JT1997(9)SC18; 1997(6)SCALE689; (1997)8SCC732

by the Director of CBI, for the offences under Section 3(5) of TADA and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. Charge-sheet, at the first instance, was filed against A1 to A6 for the said offences. Learned Judge of … the co-accused in the crime, while making the confession, such a confession cannot be used against the co-accused. 77. Even if no conditions are satisfied the use of a confession as against a co-accused is only for

General Officer Commanding Vs. Cbi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Sections 561-A; Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 201, 120-B read with 342, 304, 302, 201; Arms Act, 1959 - Section 7 of 25, 125; Delhi Police Special Establishment Act, 1946 - Section 6

Reported in : AIR 2012 SC 1890

the complaint, FIR No. 15/2000 under Section 307 of Ranbir Penal Code (hereinafter called "RPC") and Sections 7/25 Arms Act, 1959 was registered against unknown persons. A seizure memo was prepared by Major Amit Saxena (Adjutant) on 25.3.2000 showing

Daya Singh Lahoriya @ Rajeev Sudan @ Vinay Kumar Vs. State of Rajastha ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 4 and 5; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 7 and 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 353, 364A, 420, 468, 471, 472, 473 and 474; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR2008SC477; 2008CriLJ702; JT2007(7)SC31; 2007(7)SCALE163; (2007)5SCC366; 2007AIRSCW7327

offences punishable under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Sections 7 and 25 of Arms Act, 1959 and Section 18 of TADA etc. 4. The case of the prosecution was that the appellant herein along