Advanced Search Results

Sanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4

Indian Penal Code and offences under Sections 3 and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances … 1962, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and the Explosives Rules, 2008 and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 6 of TADA. At head Fifthly; The appellant, by doing the aforesaid act, committed an offence punishable under Sections

Sanjay Dutt Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Cbi,bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Indian Penal Code and offences under Sections 3 and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances … 1962, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and the Explosives Rules, 2008 and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 6 of TADA. At head Fifthly; The appellant, by doing the aforesaid act, committed an offence punishable under Sections

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6

persons and lifesentence and other sentences for the offences under TADA, the Indian PenalCode, 1860 (in short 'IPC') Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884.By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons andacquitted 23 … Memon and his associates for committing the terrorist acts. At head fourthly, for commission of the offence under Section 6 of TADA Act, on the count of unauthorisedly, within the area of Greater Bombay, with an intent to

Devinder Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 307; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 6; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27

Reported in : AIR1997SC454; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)902; 1996CriLJ4461; 1996(6)SCALE520a; [1996]Supp6SCR249

and sentenced the appellant Devinder @ Pappy under Section 302 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 read with Section 6 of Terrorist and disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 ('TADA' for short). 2. Shorn of

Mohinder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 392 and 397; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27 and 39; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 6

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)9; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)796; 1996(4)Crimes11(SC); JT1996(8)SC519; 1996(7)SCALE95; (1996)11SCC369

both Mohinder Singh and Harjinder Singh under Section 392 read with 397 IPC, and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 read with Section 6 of Terrorist & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 ('TADA') for short) and another against

Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur and anr.;state of Maharashtra Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 7, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 21, 21(1), 25, 25(1A), 25(1B), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 29(1), 35, 39 and 44; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 15, 18, 18(3), 29 and 29(1); Arms (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 21(1) and 21(2) to 21(6); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 15, 21, 24, 25, 26 and 30; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 15 and 15(2); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15 and 15(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 313 and 357; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 52A, 109, 120B, 201, 212, 302, 307, 324, 326, 411, 414 and 424; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Rules, 1999 - Rules 3, 3(6) and

Reported in : JT2009(11)SC47; 2009(11)SCALE327; (2010)14SCC641; 2010AIRSCW2574; 2011(3)SCC(Cri)867; [2009] 12 SCR 1093

guilty and is convicted for an offence punishable under Section 27(3) read with Section 7 of the The Arms Act 1959 and is hereby sentenced to death. He shall be hanged by neck till he dies. (ii) The Accused … as regards imposition of capital sentence on three Accused herein namely, Accused 5, M Zuber Kasam Shaikh, Accused 6, Fazal Mohd Shaikh and Accused 7, Azzizuddin Zahiruddin Shaikh. CONTENTIONS OF THE STATE 3. It was argued before

Hari Kishan vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and has thus been chargesheeted for the alleged commission of an offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. The petitioner, vide this petition seeks the quashing of the said FIR submitting to the effect that the … of NCT of Delhi), Ronald Albert v. State(Government of NCT of Delhi), disposed of vide common judgment dated 6.1.2016 reported in 2016 1 JCC307 The facts in each of the aforementioned cases are in circumstances pari materia

Mrs. Sunil Gupta Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

one other accused, it has been observed by the learned Magistrate that since Section 27 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 has been invoked, it would be a case triable by the Sessions Court and therefore, had dismissed the … Prosecutor was compelled to file his objections and now the matter is set down for further hearing on 6.10.2016. Incidentally, in respect of one other accused, it has been observed by the learned Magistrate that since Section

Esher Singh Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(3), 4, 4(2), 5, 6 and 15; Indian Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120A, 120A(2), 120B, 136, 143, 149, 211, 224, 273 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)270; JT2004(3)SC391; 2004(3)SCALE267; (2004)11SCC585; [2004] 2 SCR 1180

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), Section 3(3) of TADA and Section 27 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 (in short the 'Arms Act'), read with Sections 5 and 6 of TADA.3. The trial Court found that

Megha Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 6(1); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1995SC2339; 1995CriLJ3988; (1996)11SCC709

the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as TADA) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 on the basis of FIR No. dated 19th September, 1985 lodged in the Police Station Baragudha. It is … Court Bhiwani at Sirsa in Terrorist Act Case No. 76 of 1986. The appellant was tried under Section 6(1) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as TADA) and Section 25 of