Advanced Search Results
Sanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-2013
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4
Indian Penal Code and offences under Sections 3 and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances … Clause (f) of Sub Section (1) of Section 2 of TADA and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 5 of TADA. At headFourthly;The appellant possessed the above mentioned arms and ammunitions with an intent to aid terrorists
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChitwant Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Sep-02-1997
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 5; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25
JT1998(9)SC2; (1998)9SCC549
the impugned judgment, the appellant has been convicted by the learned Designated Court under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'TADA'). The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFrancis Xavier Salemao S/O David Salemao Vs. State Through the Public ...
Mumbai
Feb-15-2007
Criminal
Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5, 7; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 5, 25 and 35; Explosive Substances Act, 1905 - Sections 5; Explosives Rules, 1983
2007BomCR(Cri)847
the Act. 2. The accused was charged and tried under Sections 3, 5 r/w Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 in addition to Section 9B(1)(a) and (b) of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-2013
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6
persons and lifesentence and other sentences for the offences under TADA, the Indian PenalCode, 1860 (in short 'IPC') Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884.By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons andacquitted 23 … India by the absconding accused Tiger Memon and other co-conspirators.At head thirdly, for commission of the offence under Section 5 of TADA Act, on the count of unauthorisedly, within the notified area of Greater Bombay, from 03.02.1993 onwards,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukhtiar Ahmed Ansari Vs. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Supreme Court of India
Apr-21-2005
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 4, 5 and 20A(1); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 25(1B); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 428; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 364A, 365 and 387; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60
AIR2005SC2804; 2005(2)ALD(Cri)25; (SCSuppl)2006(1)CHN98; 2005CriLJ2569; 119(2005)DLT340(SC); JT2005(4)SC503; (2005)5SCC258
of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'TADA') as also under the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'Arms Act'). For the offence under the Arms Act, the appellant was sentenced to … 5, 2003 in Sessions Case No. 49 of 2001. The said case was registered against the appellant under Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'TADA') as also under the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKailash Nath and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
May-13-1985
Civil
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 5, 14, 17, 17(5) and 18; Constitution of India - Article 21
AIR1985All291
is materially different from a case of licence to deal in or sell firearms. Section 3 of the Arms Act, 1959 deals with acquisition and possession of firearmsor ammunition on the strength of a licence whereas Section 5 provides
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalpnath Rai Vs. State (Through Cbi)
Supreme Court of India
Nov-06-1997
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, - Sections 3(1), (2) and (3) and 15; Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) -, 1973 - Sections 2, 100(4), 313 and 465; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 52A, 136, 157 and 312; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) -, 1898 - Sections 465(2) and 537; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 4 and 25; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2(1), 3(4), 3(5), 5, 12(2) and 20A(1) and 20A(2); Evidence Act, - Sections 30 and 114
1997(2)ALD(Cri)805; 1998CriLJ369; JT1997(9)SC18; 1997(6)SCALE689; (1997)8SCC732
by the Director of CBI, for the offences under Section 3(5) of TADA and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. Charge-sheet, at the first instance, was filed against A1 to A6 for the said offences. Learned Judge of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Satyam Bhaiyya and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Feb-26-1991
Criminal
(1991)2GLR1217
was no minimum prescribed initially in the said provision. This can be found from Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. Now, if the situation like the one envisaged by the Terrorist Act is to be dealt with, the … focus of attention in this petition. Before the learned Designated Judge could frame the charge for offence under Section 5 of the Terrorist Act, by application at Exh. 5 the learned Designated Judge was moved to discharge the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSupdt. and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal Vs. Anil Kumar B ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-23-1979
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227, 228 and 465; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 5, 29 and 30
AIR1980SC52; 1979CriLJ1390; (1979)4SCC274; [1980]1SCR323
'delivery of those arms into the possession of another person' within the contemplation of Section 29(b) of the Arms Act, 1959 (For short, called the 'Act'), is the principal question that falls to be answered in this appeal by … not have a valid licence for repairs of fire-arms, is not only a contravention of the provisions of Section 5 of 'the Act, but also amounts to delivery of firearms by the respondents into the possession of Mrityunjoy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharam Pal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
May-26-1995
Commercial
Arms Act, 1959 - Section 5; ;Arms Rules, 1962 - Rule 51; ;Probate and Administration Act, 1977 - Section 50
AIR1996J& K39
arms and ammunition is granted/renewed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 5, 13, Hand 15 of the Arms Act 1959, and Rules 51 and 54 of the Arms Rules 1962. 9. It is further stated in the counter … substitute the name of the petitioner in the Arms Licence Number 4/ix/80/F. No. 11020/55/75-GPA-ll(v) dated 20-9-1980, issued under Section 5 of Arms Act, read with Rule 51 of the Arms Rules, and allow him to exercise all the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »