Advanced Search Results

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by the Chief Secretary ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Environment

Acts : Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 12, 18, 19, 21, 29, 33A, 34, 34(1) and 38; Arms Act, 1959; Environmental Protection Act, 1986; Wildlife (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 6(1); Constitution of India - Articles 48A and 51A

person residing in or within ten kilometres of any such sanctuary and holding a licence granted under the Arms Act, 1959 (54 of 1959), for the possession of arms or exempted from the provisions of that Act and possessing … even in ail four neighbouring states namely Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala and Tamil Nadu, invoking the power under Section 38 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.10.6. Mr. Udaya Holla, learned Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the State

Subhash Ramkumar Bind @ Vakil and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 12B, 34, 302, 376 and 380; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 2(1) and 27(3); Arms Rule, 1962 - Rule 3; Arms (Amendment) Act, 1988; Arms (Amendment) Ordinance, 1988; Indian Arms Rule, 1951 - Rule 7; Army Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 354(3)

Reported in : AIR2003SC269; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)924; 2003CriLJ443; JT2002(9)SC445; (2003)1SCC506; 2003(1)LC576(SC); AIR2003SC26927

under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC and on thesecond count under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959. It is at this juncture, however, it would be convenient to advert to the true purport of the … The order of sentence imposed on the appellant by the Courts below for offence under Sections 376 and 380 IPC are also confirmed along with the directions relating thereto as in the event of the execution of

The State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

of Police Station Jagraon for the offences under Sections 399, 402 IPC and under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. In the aforesaid FIR, the three present assailants and one Sikandar Singh son of Chanan Singh; Harvinder Singh … the office of CRPF and that of SSP, Ludhiana, respectively. List on 11.2.2010 for evidence and further proceedings. 38. In pursuance of the said order, Shri Rajib Sarkar, Sub Inspector, CRPF, has produced the record and has

Zahid @ Ballu @ Saleem Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3682

dated 28.9.2006 the appellants have been convicted save and except for the charge under Section 27 of the Arms Act 1959 framed against them. We clarify that since appellant Zahid was not charged for any offence under the Arms … be to record that we fail to understand the purpose of the deposition of DW-1, DW-3 and DW-5. 38. Vide impugned judgment and order dated 28.9.2006 the appellants have been convicted save and except for the charge

Mariya Anton Vijay Vs. the State Represented By,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

Crime No.18 of 2013 at 18.00 hours on 13.10.2013 for offences under Section 25(1B)(a) and (f) of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 3(b) r/w.7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Section 2(m)(5) of Motor Spirit and High

Ramandeep Singh @ Raman Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

revisionist/ petitioner was convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 for keeping in his possession one. 38 bore revolver, which is prohibited bore weapon, along with 4 live cartridges and was sentenced to undergo RI … illegality and infirmity in the findings recorded by the two Courts below. Consequently, the present revision stands dismissed. Arms Act, 1959 Section 25, Section 34, Section 336 Conviction Trial Magistrate convicted the Petitioner-accused under Section 25 of the Act and

Sunil Gupta Verses State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

I.A.1/2016 stands disposed of. A copy of this order may be provided to the learned State Public Prosecutor. Arms Act, 1959 Section 27 Bail Application Petitioner, pursuant to a direction by this court, did approach the Magistrate in seeking bail … name of Kaman Holding Private Limited , bearing Survey No.132/4 situated at Hoodi Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore, measuring 38 guntas partly and is in possession of the property. It transpires that the second respondent, a retired Assistant

Mrs. Sunil Gupta Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

one other accused, it has been observed by the learned Magistrate that since Section 27 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 has been invoked, it would be a case triable by the Sessions Court and therefore, had dismissed the … the name of ‘Kaman Holding Private Limited’, bearing Survey No.132/4 situated at Hoodi Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore, measuring 38 guntas partly and is in possession of the property. It transpires that the second respondent, a retired Assistant

Iyyappan vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (the UAP Act) and Section 3 read with Section 25(1B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959. 18 persons were arrayed as accused. Annexure-1crime 249/2017 was registered by Edakkara police station on 30/09/2017 based on … asaccused no.27 in S.C.No.2/2021 alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 121 and 122 IPC; Sections 18A, 20, 38 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (the UAP Act) and Section 3 read with Section 25(1B)(a) of the

In Re: Madivalappa Channappa Hulgur and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1966CriLJ672

rigorous imprisonment for three years. Accused 1 was also convicted for an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act 1959 and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year. But this sentence was directed to run concurrently with