Advanced Search Results

Kuruva Surya Prakash Reddy Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(B), 25(1B) and 37; Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)341; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)384; 2002CriLJ2356

against him stand abated. After obtaining sanction from the District Collector Al was charge-sheeted under Section 25(B)(a) of Arms Act, 1959.5. To substantiate its case the prosecution has examined PWs. 1 to 3 and 6 marked Exs. P1 to … a period of one year for the said offence.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contenced that under Section 37(b) of the Arms Act (for brevity the Act) the accused was arrested on 15-3-1994. According to the prosecution

Walji Alias Walya Dashrath Johny Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 387; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 37

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4284

Criminal - offence - Sections 367, 387 and 452 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 37 of Arms Act, 1959 - Trial Judge passed Order holding appellant guilty under Sections 367, 387 and 452 and Section 37 -

SadruddIn Javeri Vs. Government of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132-A(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 47, 93 to 100, 102, 165, 173, 173(2), and 457; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 182, 211, 381, 403, 406 and 420; Arms Act, 1959; Excise Act; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 37

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD113; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)943; 1998(1)ALT529

of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 182, 211, 381, 403, 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Arms Act, 1959, Excise Act and Section 37 of Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - petitioner moved Court under Article 226 alleging

In Re: Madivalappa Channappa Hulgur and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1966CriLJ672

rigorous imprisonment for three years. Accused 1 was also convicted for an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act 1959 and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year. But this sentence was directed to run concurrently with … Pleader sought to place reliance on the following passage in Taylors Medical Jurisprudence 11th Edn. Vol. 1, page 375 to establish that incised injuries can also be caused by gun shot.The shape of entrance is usually circular

Faujdari Mistry and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1)(A), 25(1)(AA), 26, 26(2), 26(3) and 37; Probation of Offenders Act; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 364, 395 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 29, 94, 100 and 360

No. 242/89 by which the learned Court had convicted all the four appellants under Section 25(1)(A) of the Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years each. The appellants were further convicted under Section … by the police authority at the time of the search. In this connection. I will firstly refer to Section 37 of the Arms Act which runs as follows :-37. Arrests and searches.- Save as otherwise provided in this

The State Rep. by Inspector of Police Q Branch Cid Thoothukudi Vs. Mar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

a First Information Report (in short “FIR”) in Cr.No.18/2013 under Section 25 (1B) (a) and (f) of the Arms Act, 1959 read with Section 3(b) and Section 7 (1) (a) (ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with … guards on the vessel from being prosecuted, under the Arms Act. (83) The learned Judge then in Paras 37 and 38 held that in the light of findings already recorded, no case is made out against any

Suresh Chand Sharma Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 300; Arms Act, 1959 - Section 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Sections 173, 313, 161

the offence punishable under Section 302/307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment as under:- "(i) to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a … it would be difficult to sustain the conviction of the Appellant for the offence under Section 307 IPC. 37. Now coming to the second question about the intention of the Appellant to cause injury which the deceased

NitIn Narayan Pandare Vs. M.N. Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2 and 3; ;Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)812; 2003CriLJ510

Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code or any of the offences punishable under Chapter V of the Arms Act, 1959. 7. Since a perusal of Section 2(b-i) of the MPDA Act would show that for detaining a person … 324, 452, 342, 34, IPC at Nirmal nagar police station one L.A.C. namely L.A.C. No. 937/2001 Under section 37(1)(a) of the Bombay Police Act registered at Nirmal nagar police station on 25-6-2001 and in --camera statements of

The State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

of Police Station Jagraon for the offences under Sections 399, 402 IPC and under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. In the aforesaid FIR, the three present assailants and one Sikandar Singh son of Chanan Singh; Harvinder Singh … Baghel Singh by the appellants proved and sentenced them to death sentence subject to confirmation by this Court. 37. While hearing the murder reference and the appeals, it was found on 28.1.2010 that additional evidence is required

Zahid @ Ballu @ Saleem Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3682

dated 28.9.2006 the appellants have been convicted save and except for the charge under Section 27 of the Arms Act 1959 framed against them. We clarify that since appellant Zahid was not charged for any offence under the Arms … people gathered at the spot and he left the spot as he became perplexed being a poor man. 37. Pertaining to the witnesses of the defence suffice would it be to record that we fail to understand