Advanced Search Results

Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur and anr.;state of Maharashtra Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 7, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 21, 21(1), 25, 25(1A), 25(1B), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 29(1), 35, 39 and 44; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 15, 18, 18(3), 29 and 29(1); Arms (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 21(1) and 21(2) to 21(6); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 15, 21, 24, 25, 26 and 30; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 15 and 15(2); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15 and 15(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 313 and 357; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 52A, 109, 120B, 201, 212, 302, 307, 324, 326, 411, 414 and 424; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Rules, 1999 - Rules 3, 3(6) and

Reported in : JT2009(11)SC47; 2009(11)SCALE327; (2010)14SCC641; 2010AIRSCW2574; 2011(3)SCC(Cri)867; [2009] 12 SCR 1093

recorded in the judgment impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than 6 [one year] Section 35 of the Arms Act, 1959 reads as follows: Section 35 - Criminal responsibility of persons in occupation of … guilty and is convicted for an offence punishable under Section 27(3) read with Section 7 of the The Arms Act 1959 and is hereby sentenced to death. He shall be hanged by neck till he dies. (ii) The Accused

Sunderlal Kanaiyalal Bhatija Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987 - Sections 12, 12(1), 12(2), 15 and 15(1); ;Arms Act, 1959 - Section 35; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 353 and 402; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 25; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 162; ;Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Rules

307, 353 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code [for short 'IPC'] read with Section 35(c) of the Arms Act, 1959. The provisions of the TADA Act were also applied in the said case. However, the said provisions of

Francis Xavier Salemao S/O David Salemao Vs. State Through the Public ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5, 7; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 5, 25 and 35; Explosive Substances Act, 1905 - Sections 5; Explosives Rules, 1983

Reported in : 2007BomCR(Cri)847

to be in possession is within his special knowledge. 15. The learned Public Prosecutor invites my attention to Section 35 of the Arms Act, 1959 and submits that it was for the accused to have proved that he … the Act. 2. The accused was charged and tried under Sections 3, 5 r/w Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 in addition to Section 9B(1)(a) and (b) of the

GayasuddIn @ GayasuddIn Mian @ Gayasudding Ansari and anr. Vs. State o ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395, 397, 399 and 402; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1), 26 and 35; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2)

Reported in : 2005(2)BLJR851; 2005CriLJ4230; [2005(3)JCR501(Jhr)]

dismissed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 167 (2) - Penal Code, 1860, Sections 395, 397, 399 and 402--Arms Act, 1959, Sections 25 (1-b); 26 and 35--Grant of bail--Offence registered under--Final form not submitted within statutory limits--CJM granted bail

Himanshu @ Chintu. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 read with 34; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC), 1973 - Section 313; Arms Act 1959 - Section 27

5000/- each with a default stipulation. A-4 was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 as well. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and a fine of Rs. 2000/- with … Sessions for trial.8. The accused were tried in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi. The prosecution examined 35 witnesses and also got exhibited the various documents. The trial judge recorded the statement of the accused under

Mrs. Nakshatram Kanakraj Nadar Vs. the Commissioner of Police and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 390, 395 and 397; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 4, 25(1) and 35; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135; Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985

Reported in : 2005(1)MhLj465

Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code or any of the offences (sic) under Chapter V of the Arms Act, 1959. It is not in dispute that the offences in respect of which the crimes have been registered against … Sections 395 and 397 of IPC read with Sections 4, 25(1-b)(a) and 35 of the Indian Arms Act and Section 135 of the Bombay Police … challenging the order of detention dated 26th September 2003 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Greater Bombay under Section 3(1) of the said Act.2. Pursuant to the aforesaid order the detenu was detained on 30th September 2003.

AmIn Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 396; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378, 378(3), 379, 390, 396, 411A, 417(2), 427 and 482

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1012; 2009CriLJ2266; 2009(3)SCALE391; (2009)3SCC776; 2009(2)LC1008(SC); [2009] 3 SCR 348

396 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Sections 3 and 35 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short the `Arms Act'). The learned Sessions Judge, Alwar, acquitted the accused persons of all the charges. … of the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench. Six persons faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Sections 3 and 35 of the

Vijayan @ Rajan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 109, 120-B, 201, 302 and 447; Indian Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 35

Reported in : AIR1999SC1086; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)479; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)156; 1999CriLJ1638; 1999(1)Crimes92(SC); JT1999(1)SC499; 1999(1)KLT760(SC); RLW1999(3)SC410; 1999(1)SCALE479; (1999)3SCC54

- Sections 34, 120B and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25 and 35 of Indian Arms Act, 1959 - appellants convicted for offence of criminal conspiracy and murder - evidence of PW. 4 totally unworthy of … 753 of 1991 were tried in the Court of Session Judge Hmakulam for having committed the offence under Sections 120B, 109, 447, 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and also under

Pradip Madgaonkar @ Bandya Mama Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act 1999 - Sections 3(1), 3(1), 5, 20, 23(1) and 23(2); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 25, 27 and 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120(B), 302, 384, 385, 386, 387, 452, 504 and 506; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act 1987 - Sections 20A(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 190 and 319

386, 387, 504, 506(ii) read with 120(B) of IPC and Section 3 read with 25 and 35 of Arms Act, 1959 which was initially registered as crime No. 207 of 2005 by Tilak Nagar Police Station on the basis

The State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

of Police Station Jagraon for the offences under Sections 399, 402 IPC and under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. In the aforesaid FIR, the three present assailants and one Sikandar Singh son of Chanan Singh; Harvinder Singh … the original admission file of Baghel Singh by the principal of the Lal Lajpat Rai Memorial Polytechnic College. 35. In defence, DW1-Malkiat Singh, Senior Assistant, Mental Hospital, Amritsar, was examined. He has brought the record of Charanjit