Advanced Search Results

Supdt. and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal Vs. Anil Kumar B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227, 228 and 465; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 5, 29 and 30

Reported in : AIR1980SC52; 1979CriLJ1390; (1979)4SCC274; [1980]1SCR323

'delivery of those arms into the possession of another person' within the contemplation of Section 29(b) of the Arms Act, 1959 (For short, called the 'Act'), is the principal question that falls to be answered in this appeal by

Mohd. Nazim and Etc. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 8, 8(2), 11, 13, 17, 25, 29, 33 and 44; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(2); Companies Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 155(2) and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491 and 561A; Arms Rules - Rules 4, 25, 25(2) and 25(3); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1089

have been taken up together as certain common questions of law regarding interpretation of the provisions of the Arms Act, 1959, had cropped up in all these matters. While taking up the matters, the common points will be dealt … of Section 5. It also makes punishable acquisition or possession of an fire-arm in contravention of Section 3. Section 29 speaks of an offence of knowingly purchasing arms etc. from unlicensed persons or for delivery for arms etc.

Surya Prakash ShuklA. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 454, 452; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 399 of 402, ; M.P. Dacoitee and Kidnapping Affected Area Act. - Section 11 of 13, 25(1B)(a); Arms Act, 1959 - Section 29 or 30

is also true in that event appellants could have been prosecuted under Section 29 or 30 of the Arms Act, 1959, but on the basis of above lapses, the aforesaid arms cannot be confiscated without giving notice to the

Arun Kambli Vs. State of Goa as Represented by Officer-in-charge

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 27 and 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 144; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 315, 428 and 464; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 5, 8, 9 and 10; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 4(1); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 29; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 66(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR654; 2000BomCR(Cri)654; 2000(1)MhLj780

question of fact. 12. The term 'possession' came up for interpretation with reference to section 29(b) of the Arms Act, 1959 before the Apex Court in Supdt. & Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal v. Anil Kumar Bhunja and

Lt. Governor, Nct and ors. Vs. Ved Prakash @ Vedu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 45, 47, 48, 50 and 59; Delhi Public Gambling Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 4 and 12; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135; Punjab Excise Act, 1955 - Sections 61, 63 and 66; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 - Sections 11, 107 and 108; Bombay Police Act - Sections 56; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 290, 308, 323, 427, 458, 498A to 498E, 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 70 to 89, 119 to 124, 445, 446, 447 and 448; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : JT2006(5)SC425; 2006(5)SCALE250; (2006)5SCC228; 2006(1)LC739(SC)

or(d) of any offence under Section 25, Section 26, Section 27, Section 28 or Section 29 of the Arms Act, 1959; or(e) of any offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962; or(f) of any offence under Section

Paharpur Cooling Towers Limited and Another Vs. Bangaigaon Refinery an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 29; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14; U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 18(1); Firearms Act, 1968 - Sections 1(1); Tamil Nadu Arrack (Manufacture) Rules, 1981; Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 - Rule 7

Reported in : 1994IAD(Delhi)157; AIR1994Delhi322; 1994(2)ARBLR41(Delhi); 53(1994)DLT210; 1994(28)DRJ425

done by the tendered itself or in its own name. Reference was made to some decisions under the Arms Act, 1959, and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, to show as to what the word 'possess' would mean in law. … of Madhya Pradesh : 1972CriLJ1187 , the court examined the question of possession of a fire arm under section 25(a) of the Arms Act, and in Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal v. Anil Kumar … remotely between the parties. This order of the Division Bench is dated 29 September, 1993, the present writ petition to this Court was filed on

imran Alias Abdul Quddus Khan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 110; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 153, 153-B and 294; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Control of Goonda Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 3 and 3(3); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27 and 29; Bihar Prevention of Crimes Act, 1981 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910; Supression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; Public Gambling Act, 1867

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1328

Act, 1910 or the Public Gambling Act, 1867 or Section 25, Section 27 or Section 29 of the Arms Act, 1959; or(iv) is generally reputed to be a person who is desperate and dangerous to the community; or(v) has

Salam Kaviraj @ Chuha Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Miraj @ Jakir, Asif @ Naeem and Shahin @ Bushle were further sentenced under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in … Chuha, Mohd. Illyas and Shahin @ Bushle impugn the judgment dated 25.01.2010 and the order on sentence dated 29.01.2010 whereby they all were convicted for the offence punishable u/s 396 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Ganesh Chandra Bhatt Vs. District Magistrate Almora and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Constitution

free country and no longer subject to British rule. We may now examine the relevant provisions of the Arms Act, 1959. Section 2(c) of the Act defines a firearm as follows:'Firearm' means arms of any decription designed or adapted to … must be construed now as it was construed at the time of its adoption.' In Norman v. Baltimore, 294 U.S. 240 (1939) Brewer J. declared that the meaning of the Constitution never alters--'that which it meant when

Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur and anr.;state of Maharashtra Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 7, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 21, 21(1), 25, 25(1A), 25(1B), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 29(1), 35, 39 and 44; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 15, 18, 18(3), 29 and 29(1); Arms (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 21(1) and 21(2) to 21(6); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 15, 21, 24, 25, 26 and 30; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 15 and 15(2); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15 and 15(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 313 and 357; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 52A, 109, 120B, 201, 212, 302, 307, 324, 326, 411, 414 and 424; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Rules, 1999 - Rules 3, 3(6) and

Reported in : JT2009(11)SC47; 2009(11)SCALE327; (2010)14SCC641; 2010AIRSCW2574; 2011(3)SCC(Cri)867; [2009] 12 SCR 1093

guilty and is convicted for an offence punishable under Section 27(3) read with Section 7 of the The Arms Act 1959 and is hereby sentenced to death. He shall be hanged by neck till he dies. (ii) The Accused … who was an officer associated with or interest in the investigation of the same. 50. A perusal of Section 29 of MCOCA shows that it confers a rule making power on the State. The State of Maharshtra in