Advanced Search Results

Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur and anr.;state of Maharashtra Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 7, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 21, 21(1), 25, 25(1A), 25(1B), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 29(1), 35, 39 and 44; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 15, 18, 18(3), 29 and 29(1); Arms (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 21(1) and 21(2) to 21(6); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 15, 21, 24, 25, 26 and 30; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 15 and 15(2); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15 and 15(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 313 and 357; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 52A, 109, 120B, 201, 212, 302, 307, 324, 326, 411, 414 and 424; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Rules, 1999 - Rules 3, 3(6) and

Reported in : JT2009(11)SC47; 2009(11)SCALE327; (2010)14SCC641; 2010AIRSCW2574; 2011(3)SCC(Cri)867; [2009] 12 SCR 1093

guilty and is convicted for an offence punishable under Section 27(3) read with Section 7 of the The Arms Act 1959 and is hereby sentenced to death. He shall be hanged by neck till he dies. (ii) The Accused … (2000) 4 SCC 515, State of Maharashtra v. Damu s/o Gopinath Shinde and Ors. : (2000) 6 SCC 269 and State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Fakira Dhiwar : AIR 2002 SC 16. It will also be in

Mohammed Razhur Rehman @ Umesh and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, by S ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the concerned Jail authorities for appropriate action. Indian Penal Code, 1860 Explosive Substances Act, 1908 Arms Act, 1959 Arms Act, 1959 Section 25, Section 26 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Appeal against Conviction Eight accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences

Present:- Mr. Nakul Sharma Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

quashing of FIR No.46 dated 26.4.2009, under Sections 307,324,323,188,148 and 149 IPC and under Section 25,27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (Sections 307, 326 IPC and 25,27 of the Arms Act were deleted vide inquiry report dated 27.5.2009).registered at

State of Karnataka and Another Vs. Major Naresh Vij

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 300-A; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 21(6), 25(1), 32 and 44(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 452 and 454; Arms Rules - Rule 26; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 110

Reported in : 1998(1)KarLJ432

High Point, Palace Road, Bangalore. For the said purpose he had obtained licence under the provisions of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short the 'Act' only) and the rules framed thereunder. According to the personal affidavit filed, by the … to the writ petition. Subsequent to the said seizure the police registered Crime No. 182 of 1990 under Section 25(1)(m) of the Arms Act read with Rule 26 of the Arms Rules framed under Section 44(2)(j) of

Anter Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302 ; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 24, 25, 25(1), 26 and 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1380; 2004(1)CTC612; 2004(1)JKJ21[SC]; JT2004(2)SC332; 2004(2)SCALE271; (2004)10SCC657; 2004(2)LC769(SC); 2004 Cri LJ 138; MANU/SC/0096/2004

34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC') and Section 25(1)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short 'the Arms Act'), the other three accused were charged for commission of offence punishable under Sections … that the section is in the nature of an exception to the preceding provisions particularly Section 25 and 26. It is not necessary in this case to consider if this Section qualifies, to any extent. Section 24,

Sambhu Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1) and 26(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 157

Reported in : [2004(1)JCR691(Jhr)]

and whereunder the appellants were found guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1)(c) and 26(2) of the Arms Act, 1959 and they were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years for the offence punishable under … 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh whereby and whereunder the appellants were found guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1)(c) and 26(2) of the Arms Act, 1959 and they were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment

Mahendra Poddar Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Mahendra Poddar is sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months for the offence under Sections 25(1B) of the Arms Act, 1959 and he is further sentence to undergo R.I. for six months under Section 26 of the same Act

Jitendra Panchal Vs. the Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(2) and 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 188, 220, 221(1), 221(2), 236, 237, 300, 300(1), 300(3), 300(4), 403, 403(1) and 403(2); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111, 135 and 136; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 7; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 123; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 26; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 85; Imports and Exports (Control) Act - Sections 5; Indian Insurance Act - Sections 105 and 107; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 332, 392, 399, 402 and 409; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 12, 20, 29, 23, 24, 27A, 28 and 29; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Sentencing Review Act,

Reported in : 2008CriLJ974

1999CriLJ263 , Mohinder was convicted in Special Sessions Case No. 6 of 1995 under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 by the Designated Court, Sangrur on … barred in terms of Article 20 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 300(1) of the Code and Section 26 of the General Clauses Act. Ignoring all these provisions of law, the impugned order having been passed and

Baleshwar Yadav @ Shyamji Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1552

thereunder. The prosecution failed to show any notification with respect to the provision of Section 4 of the Arms Act, 1959. But as regards contravention of Section 3 of the Act, the prosecution proved that no licence was shown … be set aside.7. Advancing his argument Mr. Singh emphatically made submission that the conviction of the appellant under Section 26 as well as 27 of the Arms Act is unsustainable as charges under both the sections may not

Rama Mistri Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Hilsa Police Station v. Rama Mistry, has convicted the petitioner herein under Sections 25-A and 26 of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), and sentenced him to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 25-A, but