Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: arms act 1959 section 16 · Page 1 of about 1,645 results (0.076 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 13 2002

Naveen Gun House and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-13-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 246; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 13 and 16; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Article 38A

Reported in : AIR2003All187; 2003(2)AWC894; (2003)1UPLBEC709

document evidencing the licence or renewal of licence relating to arms or ammunitions under the provisions of the Arms Act. 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) which are as follows :(A)Licence relating to following arms : (i) Revolvers or … of the Arms Act. Section 13 of the Arms Act lays down condition for grant of licence and Section 16 provides for fees, etc. for the licence. Sub-section (j) of Section 2 of the Arms Act defines 'licensing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1981

NaraIn Singh Parihar Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-23-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 2; Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 16; Arms Rules, 1951 - Rule 183; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1981All246

only in 1964. By that time Arms Act. 1878 had been repealed and had been replaced by the Arms Act. 1959 which became effective from 1-10-1962. In Section 2(c) of the said Act 'arms' has been defined as 'articles … retention of a weapon in deposit in the following words : 'The following periods have been prescribed under Section 16(4)(b)(ii) as the periods after the expirv of which arms, ammunitions and stores, which are not disposed of under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2002

Hamza BIn Omer @ Zafar Vs. Commissioner, City Police, Hyderabad and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-05-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 17(3)

Reported in : 2002(3)ALD275; 2002(4)ALT572

to forbear from depriving him of possession of his fire arms without following the provisions under the Indian Arms Act, 1959 and the Arms Rules of 1962 (for brevity 'The Act' and 'The Rules'). The said writ petition is … Mir Chowk Police Station was registered in which the petitioner was also an accused for the offences under Section 147, 148, 324, 307 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 27(2) of Indian Arms Act. It is … , Shesh Nath Singh v. State of Bihar and Ors., 1985 Crl.LJ 1601, Chhanga Prasad Sahu v. State of Uttar Pradesh, : AIR1986All142 .18. Heard

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 29 2012

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-2012

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Explosive Substance Act, 1908 ; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) 1973 - Section 366, 164(1)(2)(4), 163, 162, 161(2), 304, 315, 226, 229, 313, 39; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 16, 15; Explosives Act, 1884 ; Arms Act, 1959.; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 24, 25, 26, 27, 145, 32(1), 10; Constitution Of India - Article 20(3), 21, 22 (1), 156, 61, 219, 216, 217, 310, 309, 444, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 29, 32, 33, 427, 428, 517,; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 32, 52; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1) (2),; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 120-B,109, 179, 121A, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 176; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 ; (THE) Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (TADA) Act, 43 of 1993 - Section 32,

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, as well as offences under the Explosives Act, 1884, Explosive Substances Act, 1908, and Arms Act, 1959.265. Nothing will please Mr. Raju Ramachandran, senior counsel appearing for the appellant, more than stopping at this … or grievous hurt, and several other allied offences under the Penal Code (IPC), committing terrorist act punishable under Section 16 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, as well as offences under the Explosives Act, 1884, Explosive Substances Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1993

Ganesh Chandra Bhatt Vs. District Magistrate Almora and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-12-1993

Subject : Constitution

free country and no longer subject to British rule. We may now examine the relevant provisions of the Arms Act, 1959. Section 2(c) of the Act defines a firearm as follows:'Firearm' means arms of any decription designed or adapted to … Supreme Court held that 'the concept of reasonableness runs through the entire fabric of the Constitution' (vide para 16) and also 'Every facet of the law which deprives a person of life or personal liberty would therfore,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2019

Hari Kishan vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

and has thus been chargesheeted for the alleged commission of an offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. The petitioner, vide this petition seeks the quashing of the said FIR submitting to the effect that the … offence which is based on proven conscious possession. It can also be safely inferred that Crl.M.C No.3865/2016 Page 16 of 25 the petitioner's possession of the cartridge does not fall within the ambit of 'conscious possession' which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1987

Bimal Kaur Khalsa Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-20-1987

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(2), 7, 8, 9(2), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 17; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Ordinance, 1987; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 9, 10, 11(2), 16, 19 and 20; Arms Act, 1959; Explosives Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1988P&H95

F.I.R. No. 129, dt. 4th June, 1986, for offences under Ss. 302/307/148/149, Indian Penal Code, and S. 25; Arms Act, 1959(Act No. 54 of 1959) and Ss. 3 and 4 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1985; … Act, 1985: The Terrorist and disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act. 1987: Section 7 Section 8. Section 9(2) Section 13 Section 16 Section 17(2) Section 17(4) Section 17(5) = Section 9 = Section 10 = Section 11(2) = Section 16

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2016

R. Murugan Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, CBI/SCB, Chennai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-11-2016

Subject : Criminal

who stands convicted for offence under Sections 302 and 307 of IPC and under Section 27 of The Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to suffer … Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai, has stated that he recorded the statements of some of the prosecution witnesses under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. P.W.29, the then Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Salem, has stated about the recording of the statements of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2024

T.Jacob Armory vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-27-2024

or ammunition covered by the licence elsewhere than at the place of business specified.14. Section 5 of the Arms Act, 1959 provides that no person shall use, manufacture, obtain, procure, sell, transfer, :8:convert, repair, test or prove or expose … arms and ammunitions are kept does not have the requisite space. The petitioner submitted a detailed reply dated 16.02.2023 rectifying all other defects and informing the Additional District Magistrate that the petitioner is proposing to shift his

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2007

Baleshwar Yadav @ Shyamji Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-11-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1552

thereunder. The prosecution failed to show any notification with respect to the provision of Section 4 of the Arms Act, 1959. But as regards contravention of Section 3 of the Act, the prosecution proved that no licence was shown … of Home Department, Govt. of Jharkhand dated 14.7.2006 vide No. 12/5-AA/Su(51)-22/2004-2444 in exercise of the power vested under Section 16 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908. Under the circumstances conviction of the appellant is upheld under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial